Professor of Land Law, McGregor Fellow
Susan Bright has been teaching in Oxford since 1992. She joined New College as a Fellow in 2004, having previously been a Fellow at St Hilda's College. She qualified as a solicitor in London, practising in the field of commercial property. At Oxford, she teaches land law, contract law, commercial leases, and housing and human rights.
Her writing is mainly in the field of real property law, especially landlord and tenant law. Her current research interests focus around the home in land law and ‘green leases’.
In relation to the home, her work explores the legal models that are used for delivering affordable home ownership, and the considerations that come into play during the legal process when a home is lost. She is currently involved in an empircal project exploring the extent to which non-financial considerations are taken into account in possession cases.
In relation to 'green leases', she has published articles in a variety of legal and international journals that discuss the opportunities and challenges for the environmental improvement of the performance of the tenanted commercial built environment with a particular focus on the impact of the Carbon Reduction Commitment, and of green leases. She has co-authored work that brings together both the physical and the social sciences of energy use in buildings so that technological solutions are made effective by an understanding of the way that buildings are used and communities behave.
A selection of Sue's papers can be accessed on the Social Science Research Network (SSRN) at: http://ssrn.com/author=529157.
Sue is a part time Judge of the First Tier Tribunal (Property Chamber). She is also a Fellow of the South African Research Chair in Property Law, a Visiting Professorial Fellow at the University of New South Wales and an academic member of the Chancery Bar Association.
S J Bright and H Dixie, 'Evidence of Green Leases in England and Wales' (2013) 6 International Journal of Law in the Built Environment [...]
This paper reports on research that investigates the use of green clauses in leases of office and retail premises in England and Wales. We examined 26 recent leases of green build properties registered at HM Land Registry. The green clauses discovered were classified, and compared with the model form green clauses promoted by the London based Better Building Partnership’s Green Lease Toolkit.
S J Bright, 'Green Leases – Becoming more usual? ' (2013) Estates Gazette
C Axon and others, 'Building Communities: Reducing Energy Use in Tenanted Commercial Property' (2012) 40 Building Research and Information 461 [...]
Reducing energy use in tenanted commercial property requires greater understanding of ’buildings as communities’. Tenanted commercial properties represent: (1) the divergent communities that share specific buildings and (2) the organisational communities represented by multi-site landlord and tenant companies. In any particular tenanted space the opportunity for environmental change is mediated (hindered or enabled) through the lease. This discussion draws on theoretical and practical understandings of (i) the socio-legal relationships of landlords, tenants and their advisors; (ii) the real performance of engineering building services strategies to improve energy efficiency; (iii) how organisational cultures affect the ability of the sector to engage with energy efficiency strategies; and (iv) the financial and economic basis of the relationship between owners and occupiers. The transformational complexity stems from: (i) the variety of commercial building stock; (ii) the number of stakeholders (solicitors, investors, developers, agents, owners, tenants and facilities managers); (iii) the fragmentation within the communities of practice; and (iv) leasehold structures and language. An agenda is proposed for truly interdisciplinary research that brings together both the physical and social sciences of energy use in buildings so that technological solutions are made effective by an understanding of the way that buildings are used and communities behave.
S J Bright, 'Green Commercial Leases: Bringing Together Practice and Theory' (2012) Property Law Review 1 [...]
This is a note about a symposium held in Sydney involving industry leaders and academics in order to explore better (green) leasing practices.
Craig Roussac and others, 'Improving environmental performance through innovative commercial leasing: An Australian case study' (2012) 4 International Journal of Law in the Built Environment 6 [...]
The paper explains how difficult it is within the structure and content of conventional leases to reduce the environmental impact of the tenanted commercial built environment. It explores the interplay between the content and structure of commercial leases and the behaviour of building owners, managers, tenants and occupants, illustrated through the experiences of a large Australian-based commercial office building owner/operator.
S J Bright and J Bettle, 'Ashby v Kilduff – a modern day morality tale?' (2011) 41 Family Law 168
S J Bright and Nick Hopkins, 'Home, Meaning and Identity: Learning from the English Model of Shared Ownership:' (2011) 28 Housing, Theory and Society 377 [...]
This article explores the problematic nature of the label ‘home ownership’ through a case study of the English model of shared ownership, one of the methods used by the UK government to make home ownership affordable. Adopting a legal and socio-legal analysis, the article considers whether shared ownership is capable of fulfilling the aspirations households have for home ownership. To do so, the article considers the financial and non-financial meanings attached to home ownership and suggests that the core expectation lies in ownership of the value. The article demonstrates that the rights and responsibilities of shared owners are different in many respects from those of traditional home owners, including their rights as regards ownership of the value. By examining home ownership through the lens of shared ownership the article draws out lessons of broader significance to housing studies. In particular, it is argued that shared ownership shows the limitations of two dichotomies commonly used in housing discourse: that between private and social housing; and the classification of tenure between owner-occupiers and renters. The article concludes that a much more nuanced way of referring to home ownership is required, and that there is a need for a change of expectations amongst consumers as to what sharing ownership means.
S J Bright, 'Carbon Reduction and Commercial Leases in the UK' (2010) 2 International Journal of Law and the Built Environment 218 [...]
This paper explores the potential impact that the introduction of the UK’s CRC Energy Efficiency Scheme will have on a) energy use in the tenanted commercial built environment and b) the idea of the net lease.
S J Bright and S Highmore, 'Carbon Reduction Commitment and Commercial Leases' (2010) 74 Conveyancer 430 [...]
This article discusses the complexities of accommodating CRC within commercial leaes and explores drafting responses
S J Bright, 'Occupation Rents and the Trust of Land and Appointment of Trustees Act 1996: from Property to Welfare? ' (2009) 73 Conveyancer 378
S J Bright, 'Drafting Green Leases' (2008) 72 Conveyancer 498 [...]
This article looks at how the commercial leasehold relationship can be operated in a manner that reduces the environmental impact of building use. It looks particularly at the role of the leasehold contract and argues that all releases can be drafted and operated in an environmentally sensitive manner.
ISBN: 0010 -- 8200
S J Bright, 'Green leases' (2008) 158 New Law Journal 1135
The paper considers how policy changes may drive changes in leasing practices, in order to reduce environmental impact from the commercial building stock.
S J Bright, 'To the Rescue' (2008) ROOF 40 [...]
This looks at how the law may come to the aid of those caught out by sale and rent back scams.
S J Bright, 'Protecting the Small Business Tenant' (2006) 70 Conveyancer 137 [...]
article arguing that small business tenants needed the same kind of protection as is available to other consumers
S J Bright and others, 'Personal Liability in Proprietary Estoppel' (2005) 69 The Conveyancer 14 [...]
Argues that in cases of estoppel relating to land the "representor" (A) is liable to the "representee" (B), and that this personal liability survives a transfer of the land to C.
S J Bright, 'Procuring the Notice to Quit: A Public Law Challenge' (2005) 8 Journal of Housing Law 6 [...]
Discusses the Court of Appeal case in McCann v Birmingham and asks whether the local authority's encouragement to serve a notice to quit can be challenged in public law.
S J Bright and B McFarlane, 'Proprietary Estoppel and Property Rights' (2005) 64(2) Cambridge Law Journal 449
S J Bright, 'Tolerated Trespass and Stock Transfer' (2005) 2005 (8) Journal of Housing Law 15
S J Bright, 'Unfair Contract Terms and Local Authority Tenancies' (2004) Journal of Housing Law '2 [...]
Casenote on Khatun v Newham LBC
S J Bright and others, 'Anti-Social Behaviour: Local authority responsibility and the voice of the victim' (2003) CLJ 305 [...]
Considers whether victim of ASB can compel LA to take action to stop the behaviour
S J Bright, 'The Concept of the Tolerated Trespasser' (2003) 119(Jul) Law Quarterly Review 509
S J Bright, 'Avoiding Tenancy Legislation: Sham and Contracting Out Revisited' (2002) CLJ 146 [...]
This article reviews the case law on whether attempts to avoid tenancy regulation work. It sets out the approaches that can be seen being used in the cases to determine if agreements are geniune or not, and argues that the approach taken by the Court of Appeal in Bankway Properties went beyond the traditional use of the doctrine.
S J Bright, 'Estate Rent charges and Reasonableness' (2002) 66 Conveyancer 507 [...]
Considers case of Orchard Trading
S J Bright, 'Liability for the bad behaviour of others' (2001) 21 OJLS 311 [...]
Whether landowner should be responsible for bad behaviour of others from his land
S J Bright, Landlord and Tenant Law in Context (Hart Publishing 2007)
S J Bright, Landlord and Tenant Law. Past, Present and Future. (Hart 2006) [...]
Collection of essays edited by Susan Bright, with introduction by Susan Bright. Based on conference papers for conference held in September 2005. The conference was conceived and brought together by me to stimuate debate between academics and practitioners, and to provide a reflective look at landlord and tenant law as a whole.
S J Bright, 'Manchester City Council v Pinnock' in N Gravells (ed), Landmark Cases in Land Law (Hart 2013) [...]
This chapter explores what the case of Manchester CC v Pinnock means In terms of the rhetoric of ownership and our doctrinal thinking about property rights. It is argued that it heralds a much more contextualised understanding of what it means to assert ownership of land and of how claims for the recovery of land should be resolved. It is these dimensions that are explored in this chapter
S J Bright, N Hopkins and N Macklam, 'Owning Part but Losing All: Using Human Rights to Protect Home Ownership' in N Hopkins (ed), Modern Studies in Property Law (Hart 2013) [...]
“Shared ownership” is used to provide an affordable route into home ownership. Yet there is a significant problem with the shared ownership scheme; as Richardson v Midland Heart  L & TR 31 shows, in the event of the home “owner” falling into rent arrears, he or she may lose not simply his or her home, but also the equity in the property. This chapter examines whether there is some way of using existing legal principles to avoid this unjust outcome by either; first, protecting the use value of the home by relying on Convention rights under the Human Rights Act 1998 to prevent termination of the “shared ownership” lease; or, secondly, recouping the investment value of the home by using human rights law to enable the home “owner” to retain the equity even if the home is lost.
S J Bright, Jeremias Prassl and Hannah Glover, 'Tenancy Agreements' in E Simpson and M Stewart (eds), Sham Transactions (Oxford 2013)
S J Bright and L Whitehouse, 'The Opportunities and Challenges of Empirical Work: Housing Possession in Theory and in Practice' in Bram Akkermans, Eveline Ramaekers and Ernst Marais (eds), Property Law Perspective II (Antwerp: Intersentia 2013) (forthcoming) [...]
This paper explains how empirical enquiry of the kind unburdened by the pursuit of a particular hypothesis or strict adherence to scientific methods, has much to offer in terms of developing our understanding of law and, in particular, the traditionally doctrinal field of property law, providing insights into the operation of law that cannot be learned from books alone. The argument is discussed in the context of an ongoing research project by the authors that investigates whether ‘non-financial’ considerations are taken into account during the process of housing possession, looking at both owner-occupied and rented housing. The project is a broad enquiry exploring the extent to which issues other than property rights and the ability to pay are considered when it comes to losing a home, that is, matters such as the welfare of children, health problems, community networks, attachment and so on. The study is not confined to the ultimate decision making stage, when the judge decides whether or not to order possession, but looks also at how non-financial factors inform decisions made earlier on, such as whether a mortgagee thinks that the time has come to issue possession proceedings. Although the study is of possession proceedings in England, and is based around the English legal system, the purpose of this paper is not to report on the research findings but to make a point of broader significance in relation to the role of empirical research within legal scholarship.
S J Bright and others, 'Evaluating Legal Models of Affordable Home Ownership in England' in T. Turnipseed (ed), Community, Home and Identity (Ashgate 2012) [...]
This chapter explores the legal modesl used to provide for low cost home ownership and: a) Explains the legal frameworks used to deliver the main LCHO products available in England; b) Explores the potential benefits of home ownership to the individual in the form of wealth creation, “mainstreaming” and security of place; c) Sets out key additional policy objectives of LCHO, in particular introducing and supporting tenure mix (sustainable communities) and sustaining the opportunity for continued use of the subsidy to provide access to LCHO for intermediate income households; and d) Evaluates the extent to which the different products available deliver both the individual benefits of home ownership and support the wider policy objectives.
S J Bright, 'Dispossession for Arrears: The Weight of Home in English Law ' in L Fox O’Mahony and J A Sweeney (eds), The Idea of Home in law: Displacement and Dispossession (Ashgate 2010) [...]
This chapter examines whether, and if so the extent to which, the processes of dispossessing a debtor of his or her home enable weight to be attached to the importance of this home to this person. The focus is upon what will be called the ‘personal home story’.
S J Bright, 'The limits of contractual freedom in English commercial leases' in Francoise Auque (ed), Baux commerciaux, Quel modele pour l'Europe? (Larcier 2009)
S J Bright, 'Unfairness and the Consumer Contract Regulations' in A Burrows and E Peel (eds), Contract Terms (Hart 2007) [...]
This chapter looks at the meaning of unfairness and its inter-relationship with the method chosen to implement the Unfair Terms in Consumer Contracts Regulations.
S J Bright, 'Street v Mountford Revisited' in S Bright (ed), Landlord and Tenant Law. Past, Present and Future 2006 (Hart Publishing 2006)
S J Bright, 'The Uncertainty of Certainty in Leases' (2012) 128 LQR 336 [...]
This note explains the significance of the Supreme Court decision in Mexcfield v Berrisford
S J Bright and others, 'Low Cost Home Ownership: legal issues of the shared ownership lease' (2009) 73 Conveyancer 337
S J Bright, 'Article 8 Again in the House Of Lords: Kay v Lambeth; Leeds CC v Price' (2006) 70 Conveyancer 294
S J Bright, 'Eviction for Anti-social Behaviour' (2006) 70 Conveyancer 85
S J Bright, 'Tolerated Trespass or A New Tenancy?' (2006) 122 Law Quarterly Review 48
S J Bright, 'Managing or Leasing?' (2005) Conveyancer 352
S J Bright, 'Ending Tenancies by Notice to Quit: the human rights challenge' (2004) 120 LQR 398 [...]
S J Bright, 'Unfair Terms and Unfair Allocations' (2004) Journal of Housing Law 40 [...]
Note on Court of Appeal decision in Khatun v Newham LBC
S J Bright, 'Landowners Responsibility in Nuisance for Anti-social behaviour' (2003) 67 Conveyancer 171 [...]
Casenote on Winch v Mid-Beds