Evidence — Overview

Publications

Showing all[*] publications sorted by type, then year, author, title  [change this]

Showing all 32 Evidence publications currently held in our database
Change to sort them by year | title | name OR
Show only Recent | Selected publications

Journal Articles

2010

L C H Hoyano, 'Coroners And Justice Act 2009 -- (3) Special Measures Directions Take Two: Entrenching Unequal Access to Justice?' (2010) [2010] Criminal Law Review 345

This article maps (through diagrams) and analyses the changes made by the Coroners and Justice Act 2009 to existing Special Measures Directions for child witnesses, child defendants and complainants of sexual assault under the Youth Justice and Criminal Evidence Act 1999. Adult defendants suffering from some form of significant mental impairment are for the first time made eligible to apply for leave to testify using the live link and with the assistance of an intermediary. In addition, the 2009 Act deems witnesses to violent offences against the person involving the use of firearms or knives to be intimidated and hence automatically eligible for Special Measures. The article concludes that the measures for defendants do not go far enough and are susceptible to challenge under ECHR Article 6, and perhaps go too far in introducing anomalies in the treatment of different categories of intimidated witnesses.


2007

L C H Hoyano, The Child Witness Review: Much Ado about too Little (2007) November Criminal Law Review 849

In December 2004 the Government announced a review of child evidence with a remit to consider whether section 28 of the Youth Justice and Criminal Evidence Act 1999, providing for video taped pre-trial cross-examination, should be retained in some form, to review the performance of Special Measures for child witnesses, and to consider measures for vulnerable defendants. The Review Group's Consultation Paper, Improving the Criminal Trial Process of Young Witnesses, was published only in June 2007. This article critically evaluates the most significant recommendations. As of October 2008, the Government had yet to publish its position regarding the responses to the Consultation Paper, notwithstanding that the consultation period had closed in October 2007.


ISBN: 0011 135X

2006

A Ashworth, 'Four Threats to the Presumption of Innocence' (2006) 10 International Journal of Evidence and Proof 241

A revised and improved version of my SALJ article, written for a British readership and dealing with attacks on the presumption of innocence.


A Ashworth, 'Four Threats to the Presumption of Innocence' (2006) 123 South African Law Journal 62

An exploration of the justifications for the presumption of innocence, and the various arguments for curtailing it by reversing the burden of proof in certain types of case.


2005

L C H Hoyano, 'Youth Justice and Criminal Evidence Act 1999: Special Measures Directions—Compliance with Article 6' (2005) 69 Journal of Criminal Law 488

evaluates the decision of the House of Lords in Camberwell Green Youth Court ex parte D [2005] UKHL 4, [2005] 1 WLR 393, which held that mandatory Special Measures Directions for child witnessesunder the Youth Justice and Criminal Evidence Act 1999 in principle comply with ECHR Article 6.


2001

L C H Hoyano, Striking a Balance between the Rights of Defendants and Vulnerable Witnesses: Will Special Measures Directions Contravene Guarantees of a Fair Trial? (2001) [2000] Criminal Law Review 948

The Youth Justice and Criminal Evidence Act 1999 enables courts to issue Special Measures Directions to protect children and other vulnerable witnesses. This article reviewed the compatibility of these measures with the fair trial guarantee contained in article 6 of the European Convention on Human Rights. Subject to a few doubtful cases, including the withholding of Special Measures from child defendants, the great majority of Special Measures Directions were concluded to be likely to be ECHR-compatible. It was cited with approval by the House of Lords in R v Camberwell Green Youth Court ex parte D [2005] UKHL 4, [2005] 1 WLR 393, in holding that the 'primary rule' regime for child witnesses was compatible with article 6, but expressing doubt about the exclusion of child defendants from Special Measures.


ISBN: 0011 135X

2000

L C H Hoyano, 'Variations On A Theme By Pigot: Special Measures Directions for Child Witnesses' (2000) [2000] Criminal Law Review 250

This article maps and analyses the Special Measures Directions introduced for child and other vulnerable and intimidated witnesses by the Youth Justice and Criminal Evidence Act 1999. Simplified versions of the diagrams in this article are reproduced in the several editions of the official government guidance to Special Measures Directions, Achieving Best Evidence (Home Office et al).


1997

L C H Hoyano, Allan Hoyano, Gwynn Davis and Shelagh Goldie, 'A Study of the Impact of the Revised Code for Crown Prosecutors' (1997) [1997] Criminal Law Review 556

Reports on the results of an empirical research study commissioned by the Crown Prosecution Service on how Crown prosecutors use the Code for Crown Prosecutors to make decisions regarding a range of offences, using the evidential and public interest criteria.


Books

2007

L C H Hoyano and C Keenan, Child Abuse: Law and Policy Across Boundaries (OUP 2007)

This book examines the whole process of child protection from complaint investigation to prosecution in the criminal and civil courts. It provides a coherent analysis of current law and procedure across the legal and geographical boundaries within which legal discussion of child abuse is usually confined, analysing criminal, family, tort, human rights and evidence law as they bear on child abuse cases. Comparative material is drawn from over 75 jurisdictionsusing the adversarial trial model. The book was awarded the first Inner Temple Book Prize (2008). The paperback edition is updated in English law, including the Coroners and Justice Act 2009 enacted on 12 November 2009.


ISBN: 978-0-19-829946-2

1999

L C H Hoyano and others, An Assessment of the Admissibility and Sufficiency of Evidence in Child Abuse Prosecutions (Home Office, United Kingdom Government 1999)

This reports the findings of a qualitative empirical research study commissioned by the Home Office in 1997, to investigate the extent to which cases of alleged sexual, physical and emotional abuse or neglect are not prosecuted because the evidence gathered during the investigation are deemed insufficient or inadmissible. The study examined how that evidence is collected and evaluated in each of the three phases of a criminal prosecution: the interagency investigation, the assessment by the Crown Prosecution Service, and the trial.The study also provides a comparative survey of measures to facilitate the taking of children's evidence in other jurisdictions, in particular in Canada, United States, New Zealand and Australia.


ISBN: 1-84082-357-7

Chapters

2011

D Atkinson and others, 'Section D14 Assisting a Witness or Defendant' in Lord Justice Hooper and Prof David Ormerod (eds), Blackstone’s Criminal Practice 2012 (Oxford University Press 2011)

This is an entirely new chapter for Blackstone’s Criminal Practice, and explains the statutory provisions and case law governing (1) special measures for child and vulnerable witnesses, including defendants (2) best practice in questioning child and vulnerable witnesses and (3) witness anonymity orders.


2010

R M Bagshaw, 'Chapters on: 'Relevance, Admissibility and Weight; Previous and Subsequent Existence of Facts; The Best Evidence Rule'; 'Corroboration, Supporting Evidence and Related Warnings'; 'Identification'; 'Physical Conditions, States of Mind and Emotions'' in Hodge M Malek QC (ed), Phipson on Evidence, Seventeenth edition (Sweet & Maxwell 2010)

2009

P N Mirfield and others, '' in Hodge Malek (ed), Phipson on Evidence (Sweet & Maxwell 2009)

Chapters on Character


ISBN: 1847036066

2007

R M Bagshaw, 'Behavioural Science Data in Evidence Teaching and Scholarship' in Paul Roberts and Mike Redmayne (eds), Innovations in Evidence and Proof (Hart Publishing 2007)

2005

R M Bagshaw, 'Chapters on: 'Relevance, Admissibility and Weight; Previous and Subsequent Existence of Facts; The Best Evidence Rule'; 'Corroboration, Supporting Evidence and Related Warnings'; 'Identification'; 'Physical Conditions, States of Mind and Emotions'' in Hodge M Malek (ed), Phipson on Evidence, Sixteenth edition (Sweet & Maxwell 2005)

K D Grevling, 'Phipson on Evidence 16th ed' in Hodge Malek QC Gen Ed & others (Auburn, Bagsahw, Day, Grevling, Hochberg,Hollander, Mirfield, Oakley (eds), Phipson on Evidence 16th ed (Sweet & Maxwell 2005)

I am responsible for chapters 34 (Right to Silence, 35 (Confessions), 36 (Statements in Presence of Accused), 37 (Agency etc)The book is updated with supplements - one is being prepared for Sept 07


ISBN: 421874708

2003

A Ashworth, 'Exploring the Integrity principle in Evidence and Procedure' in P. Mirfield and R.J. Smith (eds), Essays for Colin Tapper (Butterworths 2003)

K D Grevling, 'Silence, Lies and Vicious Circularity' in P Mirfield & R Smith (eds), Essays for Colin Tapper (Lexis-Nexis UK 2003)

This article deals with complex and overlapping law relating to (i) the adverse inferences which may be drawn, and judicial directions to be given, when the accused fails to mention a fact when questioned he later relies upon in his defence (now mainly statutory), and (ii) lies (usually told when questioned, but sometimes given in the witness box - common law).


ISBN: 406964394

Presentation/Conference contributions

1999

L C H Hoyano, Caroline Keenan, Gwynn Davis and Lee Maitland, 'Interviewing Allegedly Abused Children with a View to a Criminal Prosecution', paper presented at Criminal Law Review 863

Courses

The course we offer in this field is:

Postgraduate

BCL

Evidence

The Law of Evidence is a valuable subject in the BCL because it is in all common law jurisdictions still dominated by common principles. This means that overseas graduates can both bring more to it, and gain more from it.

The aim of the course is to establish the basic structure of this branch of the law to which all students can relate the knowledge they acquire so as to be able to grasp it instinctively and to be able to “think on their feet.” It is the one area which lawyers need to know in detail rather than know how to acquire since problems arise, often unexpectedly, in the course of a trial for which no preparation has been possible. The more thorough the understanding of basic principles the more readily the detail can be slotted in, or created. All of these features owe their existence to the fact that the law has been gradually accreted by individual decisions of the judges in the course of trials, sometimes without the benefit of extensive reference to materials. It is because judges have so often drawn upon their instinct for the fundamentals of this branch of the law that it has developed so similarly in different jurisdictions, and has largely resisted radical statutory intervention.

These factors have also created an opportunity for useful academic reflection to draw out the principles often left unarticulated beneath the surface of the decisions. The subject has benefited from a succession of particularly talented commentators such as Thayer and Wigmore in the United States, and Cross in the United Kingdom. It tends to be in the forefront of change as increasing efforts are made to streamline civil litigation, and to cope more effectively with an increasing tide of criminal cases. These have led to the proposal of a number of innovations such as the reform of the hearsay rule, and changes in the evidential use of silence or an accused person’s previous record. The law is also adapting to newer forms of record-keeping, and the exploitation of the possibilities offered by video-recording.

In all jurisdictions the subject is in constant ferment with new codes and consolidations under consideration or implemented. Since the subject tends to highlight perceived tension between the efficient resolution of disputes and the importance of resolving them fairly, it is never short of topicality or fierce controversy.

The course in Oxford concentrates more on central principles than on the minutiae of procedure, and makes an effort to draw upon the experience of the whole of the common law world.


People

Evidence teaching is organized by a Subject Group convened by:

Peter Mirfield: CUF Lecturer

in conjunction with:

Roderick Bagshaw: CUF Lecturer
Katharine Grevling: CUF Lecturer
Laura Hoyano: Hackney Fellow & Tutor in Law and CUF Lecturer

Also working in this field, but not involved in its teaching programme:

Andrew Ashworth: Vinerian Professor of English Law
Denis Galligan: Professor of Socio-Legal Studies


© Faculty of Law :: image credits & permissions
page updated on 11 January 2012 at 16:53
Feedback on this page

the faculty of law at the university of oxford

you are here: themes - Evidence