Public International Law — Overview

Forthcoming Subject Events


February 2012

Thursday 16 February 2012  Week 5

Public International Law Discussion Group
The Restitution of Removed Cultural Properties: a Historical Precedent
Speaker: Tullio Scovazzi, Professor of International Law, University of Milano-Bicocca, Milan
New College Room 6 at 12:30

Thursday 23 February  Week 6

Public International Law Discussion Group
Title to be confirmed
Speaker: tbc
New College Room 6 at 12:30

March 2012

Thursday 1 March  Week 7

Public International Law Discussion Group
State Responsibility for International Terrorosim
Speaker: Dr Kimberley Trapp, College Lecturer in Law, Newnham College, Cambridge
New College Room 6 at 12:30

Thursday 8 March  Week 8

Public International Law Discussion Group
International Energy Law for the 21st Century
Speaker: Professor Catherine Redgwell, Professor of International Law, UCL
New College Room 6 at 12:30

News

PIL student leads in AJIL

photo of Claus Zimmermann

The lead article in the July 2011 issue of the American Journal of International Law is by one of our current DPhil students, Claus D. Zimmermann. [more…]

University Traineeship Programme at the International Court of Justice

photo of Ernesto Feliz

In 2010 Ernesto Feliz was awarded an internship at the International Court of Justice. [more…]

Discussion Group

These self-sustaining groups are an essential part of the life of our graduate school. They are organised in some cases by graduate students and in others by Faculty members and meet regularly during term, typically over a sandwich lunch, when one of the group presents work in progress or introduces a discussion of a particular issue or new case. They may also encompass guest speakers from the faculty and beyond.

Public International Law Discussion Group

Publications

Showing all[*] publications sorted by type, then year, author, title  [change this]

Showing all 115 Public International Law publications currently held in our database
Change to sort them by year | title | name OR
Show only Recent | Selected publications

Journal Articles

2012

Paparinskis, Investment Law of/for/before the 21st Century (2012) 25 Leiden Journal of International Law 225

2011

D Akande, C. Jalloh and M. du Plessis, Assessing the African Union Concerns about Article 16 of the Rome Statute of the International Criminal Court (2011) 4 African Journal of Legal Studies 5

DOI: 10.1163/170873811X563947

This article assesses the African Union’s (AU) concerns about Article 16 of the Rome Statute of the International Criminal Court (ICC). It seeks to articulate a clearer picture of the law and politics of deferrals within the context of the AU’s repeated calls to the United Nations Security Council (UNSC, or the Council) to invoke Article 16 to suspend the processes initiated by the ICC against President Omar Al Bashir of Sudan. The UNSC’s failure to accede to the AU request led African States to formally withhold cooperation from the ICC in respect to the arrest and surrender of the Sudanese leader. Given the AU’s continued concerns, and the current impasse, fundamental questions have arisen about the Council’s authority to exercise, or not exercise, its deferral power. This culminated into a November 2009 African proposal for an amendment to the Rome Statute to empower the UN General Assembly to act should the UNSC fail to act on a deferral request after six months. Although ICC States Parties have so far shown limited public support for the AU’s proposed amendment to the deferral provision, this article examines its merits because a failure to engage the “Article 16 problem” could impact international accountability efforts in the Sudan, and further damage the ICC’s credibility in Africa. This unresolved issue also has wider significance given that the matters underlying the tension – how ICC prosecutions may be reconciled with peacemaking initiatives and the role and power of the Council in ICC business – will likely arise in future situations from around the world.


I Papanicolopulu, On the interaction between law and science: considerations on the ongoing process of regulating underwater acoustic pollution (2011) 1 Aegean Review of the Law of the Sea and Maritime Law 247

DOI: 10.1007/s12180-011-0018-6

Scientific and technological development necessitates often legal regulation, to be achieved through an interaction between science and law during the decision-making process. Taking as an example the case of underwater noise pollution, the examination of which is underway in many international organisations with a view towards its regulation, the article proposes to comment upon some aspects of this interaction. It is finally submitted that law provides sufficient legal principles and institutionalised frameworks for cooperation, which however have not been sufficiently put in use so far.


I Papanicolopulu and E Milano, State Responsibility in Disputed Areas on Land and at Sea (2011) 71 Zeitschrift für ausländisches öffentliches Recht und Völkerrecht - Heidelberg Journal of International Law 587

Starting from the observation that traditionally the law of State responsibility has hardly interacted with the law applicable to territorial and boundary disputes, the article examines how these two fields of international law may relate in the case of State action in contested areas, be they terrestrial or marine. Assessing recent international practice, particularly the case law of the International Court of Justice and arbitral tribunals, and differentiating between land and maritime disputes, it identifies the primary obligations incumbent upon States when acting in contested areas – relating to State sovereignty and sovereign rights, ius ad bellum, ius in bello, procedural obligations pending the final settlement of the dispute – and it examines the consequences of the breach of those primary norms, in terms of secondary obligations, as well as third States’ duties and obligations. The legal framework specifically created for disputed maritime areas by Art. 74 para. 3 UNCLOS and Art. 83 para. 3 UNCLOS, including its implications for land disputes, is specifically analysed. The authors submit that, at a time of increasingly pro-active policies and robust actions taken by States in contested areas, more attention should be devoted to the extent to which the law of State responsibility, especially with regard to relevant forms of reparation, has to adapt to the content and scope of primary norms applicable to that specific context


I Papanicolopulu, Submission to Arbitration of the Dispute on the Marine Protected Area around the Chagos Archipelago (2011) 26 The International Journal of Marine and Coastal Law 667–678

Paparinskis, MFN Clauses and International Dispute Settlement: Moving Beyond Maffezini and Plama? (2011) 26 ICSID Review - Foreign Investment Law Journal 14

A Russell, 'Incorporating Social Rights in Development: Transnational Corporations and the Right to Water' (2011) 7 International Journal of Law in Context 1

2010

D Akande, Clearing the Fog of War? The ICRC's Interpretive Guidance on Direct Participation in Hostilities (2010) 59 International and Comparative Law Quarterly 180

D Akande and Sangeeta Shah, Immunities of State Officials, International Crimes and Foreign Domestic Courts (2010) 21 European Journal of International Law 815

DOI: 10.1093/ejil/chq080

This article examines the extent to which state officials are subject to prosecution in foreign domestic courts for international crimes. We consider the different types of immunity that international law accords to state officials, the reasons for the conferment of this immunity and whether they apply in cases in which it is alleged that the official has committed an international crime. We argue that personal immunity (immunity ratione personae) continues to apply even where prosecution is sought for international crimes. Also we consider that instead of a single category of personal immunity there are in fact two types of such immunity and that one type extends beyond senior officials such as the Head of State and Head of Government. Most of the article deals with functional immunity (immunity ratione materiae). We take the view that this type of immunity does not apply in the case of domestic prosecution of foreign officials for most international crimes. However, we reject the traditional arguments which have been put forward by scholars and courts in support of this view. Instead we consider the key to understanding when functional immunity is available lies in examining how jurisdiction is conferred on domestic courts.


V Moreno Lax, 'The EU Regime on Interdiction, Search and Rescue, and Disembarkation: The Frontex Guidelines for Intervention at Sea' (2010) 25(4) The International Journal of Marine and Coastal Law 621-635.

Paparinskis, The Limits of Depoliticisation in Contemporary Investor-State Arbitration (2010) 3 Select Proceedings of the European Society of International Law 271

A Russell, 'International Organizations and Human Rights: Resisting, Realizing or Repackaging the Right to Water?' (2010) 9 Journal of Human Rights 1

D Sarooshi, '‘The Recourse to the Use of Force by the United Nations’' (2010) 104 American Society of International Law Proceedings 1

2009

D Akande, The Legal Nature of the Security Council Referrals to the ICC and its Impact on Al Bashirs Immunities (2009) 7 Journal of International Criminal Justice 333

DOI: 10.1093/jicj/mqp034

This article considers whether states are obliged or permitted to arrest Sudanese President Omar al Bashir pursuant to a warrant of arrest issued by the International Criminal Court (ICC). The article considers the extent to which the ICC Statute removes immunities which would ordinarily be available to state officials. It is argued that the removal of the immunity by Article 27 of the ICC Statute applies also at the national level, when national authorities act in support of the ICC. The article examines the application of Article 98 of the ICC Statute and considers the legal nature of Security Council referrals to the ICC. It is argued that the effect of the Security Council referral is that Sudan is to be regarded as bound by the ICC Statute and thus by Article 27. Given that the Statute operates in this case not as a treaty but by virtue of being a Security Council resolution, the removal of immunity operates even with regard to non-parties. However, since any (implicit) removal of immunity by the Security Council would conflict with customary international law and treaty rules according immunity to a serving head of state, the article considers the application of Article 103 of the United Nations (UN) Charter in this case.


Paparinskis, Investment Protection Law and Sources of Law: A Critical Look (2009) 103 ASIL Proceedings 76

2008

Paparinskis, Barcelona Traction - A Friend of Investment Protection Law (2008) Baltic Yearbook of International Law 105

Paparinskis, Investment Arbitration and the Law of Countermeasures (2008) 79 British Yearbook of International Law 264

A Russell and M Langford, 'Global Precedent' or 'Reasonable No More'?: The Mazibuko Case' (2008) 19 Journal of Water Law 73

D Sarooshi, 'The Role of Domestic Public Law Analogies in the Law of International Organizations' (2008) 5 International Organizations Law Review 237

2007

D Akande, Are there Limits to the Powers of the Security Council? in Old Questions and New Challenges for the UN Security System (2007) V Journal of International Law and Policy

2006

D Sarooshi, 'The Move from Institutions: the case of the WTO' (2006) 100 American Society of International Law Proceedings 298

2005

A Russell, 'Towards an International Right to Water' (2005) 14 Human Rights Defender 10

D Sarooshi, The Future of the WTO and its Dispute Settlement System (2005) 2(1) International Organizations Law Review 129

2004

A V Lowe, M. Fitzmaurice and O. Elias, 'Northern European Co-operation regarding Watercourses' (2004) Watercourse Co-operation in Northern Europe/TMC Asser Press 95

A V Lowe, 'The Place of Dr Thomas Baty in the International Law Studies of the 20th Century' (2004) The Commemorative Seminar for Dr Thomas Baty: Contributions of Dr Thomas Baty and Their Reappraisal/University of Tokyo

D Sarooshi, 'Conferrals by States of Powers on International Organizations: The Case of Agency' (2004) 74 The British Year Book of International Law 291

D Sarooshi, 'The Essentially Contested Nature of the Concept of Sovereignty: Implications for the Exercise by International Organizations of Delegated Powers of Government' (2004) 25 Michigan Journal of International Law 1107

D Sarooshi, 'The Landmark WTO US v. Mexico case' (2004) 36 Commonwealth Secretariat Trade Topics 1

D Sarooshi and R. Volterra, 'The WTO and the Importance of International Law for Business' (2004) March Special Feature – WTO, European Lawyer 27

D Sarooshi, '‘Sovereignty, Economic Autonomy, the United States, and the International Trading System: Representations of a Relationship’' (2004) 15(4) European Journal of International Law 651

D Sarooshi, '‘The Nature of the Concept of Sovereignty: Implications for the Exercise by International Organizations of Powers of Government’' (2004) 25 Michigan Journal of International Law 1107

2003

D Akande, The Jurisdiction of the International Criminal Court over Nationals of Non-Parties: Legal Basis and Limits (2003) (2003)1 Journal of International Criminal Justice 618

This article examines the jurisdiction of the International Criminal Court (ICC) over nationals of states not party to the ICC Statute. The article first addresses the US argument that the exercise of ICC jurisdiction over nationals of non-parties without the consent of that non-party would be contrary to international law. The author considers the principles which support the delegation of criminal jurisdiction by states to international tribunals and discusses the precedents for such delegations. It is further argued that the exercise of ICC jurisdiction over acts done pursuant to the official policy of a non-party state would not be contrary to the principle requiring consent for the exercise of jurisdiction by international tribunals. Finally, the article explores the limits to the jurisdiction of the ICC over non-party nationals. In particular, the article addresses the circumstances in which ICC parties are precluded from surrendering nationals of non-parties to the ICC.


A V Lowe and others, 'The International Tribunal for the Law of the Sea: Survey for 2002' (2003) Vol 18, No. 4, 2003 International Journal of Marine and Coastal Law 447

A V Lowe, 'The Iraq Crisis: What Now?' (2003) 52(4) International and Comparative Law Quarterly 859

A V Lowe, 'The Rule of Law: Thinking of an Order in the International Society' (2003) 177(2003) Gaiko Forum 24

2002

C Harvey, 'The Prosecution of Crimes of War Committed in the former Yugoslavia: A Critical Analysis of the Role of the National Courts of Selected European States' (2002) 41 Military Law and the Law of War Review 169

A V Lowe, 'The International Tribunal for the Law of the Sea: Survey for 2001' (2002) Vol 17, 2001 International Journal of Marine and Coastal Law 463

A Russell, 'Why Canada Should be Hesitant to Follow the United States and European Approach to Implementing the 1996 WIPO Copyright Treaty' (2002) 20 CPR 315

2001

A V Lowe, 'The International Tribunal for the Law of the Sea: Survey for 2000' (2001) Vol 16, 2001 International Journal of Marine and Coastal Law 549

D Sarooshi, 'Command Responsibility and the Blaskic case' (2001) 50 ICLQ 452

D Sarooshi, '‘Aspects of the Relationship between the International Criminal Court and the United Nations’' (2001) 32 Netherlands Yearbook of International Law 27

2000

D Sarooshi, 'The Role of the UN Secretary-General in UN Peace-Keeping' (2000) 20 Australian Yearbook of International Law 279

D Sarooshi, '‘The UN and the Establishment of Peace’' (2000) 53 Current Legal Problems 621

1999

D Sarooshi, '‘The Statute of the International Criminal Court’' (1999) 48 ICLQ 387

D Sarooshi, '‘What Role For NATO in the Maintenance of Peace?’' (1999) 52 Current Legal Problems 473

K S Ziegler, 'Book review: Gerald Schmitz, Tibet und das Selbstbestimmungsrecht der Völker, Berlin 1998' (1999) Juristische Rundschau 482

1998

D Akande, The Competence of International Organizations and the Advisory Jurisdiction of the International Court of Justice (1998) 8 European Journal of International Law 437

D Sarooshi, 'The Powers of the United Nations International Criminal Tribunals' (1998) 2 Max Planck Yearbook of UN Law 141

K S Ziegler, 'Bookreview: Christian Scherer-Leydecker, Minderheiten und sonstige ethnische Gruppen. Eine Studie zur kulturellen Identität im Völkerrecht, Berlin 1997' (1998) Europa Ethnica 176

1997

D Akande, 'The International Court of Justice and the Security Council: Is there Room for Judicial Control of Decisions of the Political Organs of the United Nations' (1997) 46 International and Comparative Law Quarterly 309

1996

D Akande, 'The Legal Imperatives toward Supranationalism Inherent in the Process of Economic Integration' (1996) 8 Proceedings of the Annual Conference of the African Society of International and Comparative Law 103

D Akande, 'The Role of the International Court of Justice in the Maintenance of International Peace' (1996) 8 African Journal of International and Comparative Law 592

D Sarooshi, 'The Legal Framework Governing United Nations Subsidiary Organs' (1996) 67 The British Year Book of International Law 413

1994

D Akande, S. Davis, M. Guerts and T. Doyle, 'New Trends in United Nations Peacekeeping" - a section in “Recent Developments in International Law 1993' (1994) European Law Students’ Association Law Review 71

Books

2012

Paparinskis, Basic Documents on International Investment Protection (Hart Publishing 2012) (forthcoming)

Paparinskis, The International Minimum Standard and Fair and Equitable Treatment (Oxford University Press 2012) (forthcoming)

2009

A V Lowe and with S.A.G. Talmon, Basic Documents on the Law of the Sea: The Legal Order of the Oceans (Hart Publishing 2009)

This compendium of documents brings together, for the first time in an affordable format, the essential documents needed to gain a thorough knowledge of the laws of the sea. There has been a long felt need for such a collection to provide students, scholars and practitioners with a working library of the key materials. This collection integrates documents of the International Maritime Organisation (which are not available anywhere on the web in consolidated form), of regional fisheries organizations, security related documents, treaties concerning resource exploitation, environmental protection measures and much more, into the framework created by the Law of the Sea Convention. The book is aimed at teachers and practitioners in the area and can be used as a class room companion for law of the sea courses.


ISBN: 1841138231/97818411

2005

I Papanicolopulu, Il confine marino: unità o pluralità? (The Maritime boundary: one or multiple?) (Giuffrè Editore 2005)

D Sarooshi, International Organizations and Their Exercise of Sovereign Powers (Oxford Monographs in International Law Series) (OUP 2005)

This 2005 hardback edition of this book was awarded the 2006 Myres S. McDougal Prize by the American Society for Policy Sciences, and also the 2006 American Society of International Law book prize (Preeminent Contribution to Creative Scholarship).


ISBN: 978-0-19-922577-4

2004

D Sarooshi and M.Fitzmaurice, Issues of State Responsibility before International Judicial Institutions (Clifford Chance Series Volume VII 2004)

2000

D Sarooshi, United Nations and the Development of Collective Security: the Delegation by the UN Security Council of its Chapter VII Powers (OUP 2000)

Chapters

2012

V Moreno Lax, 'The “Safe Third Country” Notion Revisited: An Appraisal in light of General International Rules on the Law of Treaties' in G S Goodwin-Gill (ed), 2010 Study Session, The Hague Academy of International Law (The Hague: Martinus Nijhoff, 2012) (forthcoming)

I Papanicolopulu, Mediterranean Sea in R Wolfrum (ed), The Max Planck Encyclopedia of Public International Law (Oxford University Press 2012)

Paparinskis, Inherent Powers of ICSID Tribunals: Broad and Rightly So in Ian Laird and Todd Weiler (eds), Investment Treaty Arbitration and International Law (Juris Publishing 2012) (forthcoming)

Paparinskis, Latvia in Chester Brown and Devashish Krishan (eds), Commentaries on Selected Model Investment Treaties (Oxford University Press 2012) (forthcoming)

Paparinskis, Sources of Law and Arbitral Interpretations of Pari Materia Investment Protection Rules in Ole Kristian Fauchald and Andre Nollkaemper (eds), The Practice of International and National Courts and the (De-)Fragmentation of International Law (Hart Publishing 2012) (forthcoming)

2011

I Papanicolopulu, T Scovazzi and G Francalanci, Albania-Greece in Colson & Smith (eds), International Maritime Boundaries (Martinus Nijhoff Publishers 2011)

I Papanicolopulu, T Scovazzi and G Francalanci, Cyprus-Egypt in Colson & Smith (eds), International Maritime Boundaries (Martinus Nijhoff Publishers 2011)

I Papanicolopulu, The European Union and the Regulation of Underwater Noise Pollution in Vidas & Schei (eds), The World Ocean in Globalization: Challenges and Responses (Brill 2011)

Paparinskis, Equivalent Primary Rules and Differential Secondary Rules: Countermeasures in WTO and Investment Protection Law in Tomer Broude and Yuval Shany (eds), Multi-Sourced Equivalent Norms in International Law (Hart Publishing 2011)

Paparinskis, Investment Treaty Interpretation and Customary Investment Law: Preliminary Remarks in Chester Brown and Kate Miles (eds), Evolution in Investment Treaty Law and Arbitration (Cambridge University Press 2011)

Paparinskis, Regulatory Expropriation and Sustainable Development in Markus W Gehring, Marie-Claire Cordonier Segger, Andrew Newcombe (eds), Sustainable Development in World Investment Law (Kluwer Law International 2011)

A Russell and S McCaffrey, 'Tapping Transboundary Waters: Implications of the Right to Water for States Sharing International Watercourses' in A Russell & M Langford (eds), The Right to Water: Theory, Practice and Prospects (CUP 2011)

A Russell, 'The Emergence of the Human Right to Water: Interdisciplinary Intersections' in The Right to Water: Theory, Practice and Prospects (CUP 2011)

2010

TAO Endicott, '‘The Logic of Freedom and Power’ ' in Samantha Besson and John Tasioulas (eds), The Philosophy of International Law (Oxford University Press 2010)

A state is sovereign if it has complete power within its political community, and complete external freedom. It may seem that the idea of sovereignty is incoherent, or that sovereignty is objectionable, because of a paradox and two moral principles. The paradox is that a sovereign state must be capable of binding itself and also must not be capable of binding itself. The moral principles are that no state can justly have complete freedom internally, and that a state ought to be bound in international law by rules that it has not agreed to, such as norms of ius cogens. I argue that the paradox is only apparent, and that the moral principles are compatible with state sovereignty. So the idea of sovereignty is a coherent idea, and sovereignty is a potentially valuable feature of states in international law. Sovereignty is to be understood as internal power and external freedom that are complete for the purposes of a good state.


ISBN: 0199208573

A V Lowe, 'Private Disputes and the Public Interest in International Law' in D. French, M. Saul and N.D. White (eds), International Law and Dispute Settlement (Hart Publishing 2010)

2009

D Akande, 'Arrest Warrant Case”; “Pius Nwaoga v. The State' in Cassese, Akande, et al (eds), Oxford Companion to International Criminal Justice (OUP 2009)

D Akande, Civil Remedies for International Crimes in Cassese, Akande, et al. (eds), Oxford Companion to International Criminal Justice (OUP 2009)

D Akande, '“The Protective Principle”; “The Active Nationality Principle”; “The Passive Personality Principle”; “The Territoriality Principle”' in Cassese, Akande, et al (eds), Oxford Companion to International Criminal Justice (OUP 2009)

A V Lowe, 'Shadows in the Cave: The Nature of International Law when it Appears before English Courts' in K.H. Kaikobad & M. Bohlander (eds), Essays in Honor of Colin Warbrick: International Law & Power, Perspectives on Legal Order & Justice (Martinus Nijhoff Publishers 2009)

Paparinskis, Piracy in Antonio Cassese and others (eds), Oxford Companion to International Criminal Justice (Oxford University Press 2009)

K S Ziegler, Domaine Resérvé in R Wolfrum (ed), Encyclopedia of Public International Law (Oxford, OUP 2009)

2008

D Akande, 'Act of State Doctrine' in P. Cane (ed), The New Oxford Companion to Law (OUP 2008)

D Sarooshi, 'International Economic Law' in P. Cane (ed), The New Oxford Companion to Law (OUP 2008)

D Sarooshi, 'The Security Council’s Authorization of Regional Bodies to Use Force' in V. Lowe, A. Roberts, and J. Welsh (eds), The United Nations Security Council and War ( 2008)

K S Ziegler, Jay Treaty (1794) in R Wolfrum (ed), Encyclopedia of Public International Law (Oxford, OUP 2008)

K S Ziegler, 'Patrimonio culturale e diritti umani' in Centro Internazionale di Studi Gentiliani (ed), Alberico Gentili: La salvaguardia dei beni culturali nel diritto internazionale (Milano, Giuffrè 2008)

Abstract: Also published in English ‘Cultural Heritage and Human Rights’ as Oxford Legal Studies Research Paper No. 26/2007, (SSRN).

2006

D Akande, The Application of International Law Immunities in Prosecutions for International Crimes in Harrington, Milde & Vernon (eds), Bringing Power to Justice? The Prospects of the International Criminal Court (McGill-Queens University Press 2006)

D Sarooshi, 'International Criminal Justice: An Institutional Future?' in M. Cohen (ed), La promotion de la justice, des droits de l’homme et du règlement des conflits par le droit international ( 2006)

2005

A Russell and A Khalfan, 'The Recognition of the Right to Water in South Africa's Legal Order' in H Smets (ed), The Right to Water in Africa and Europe (Académie de l'eau Paris 2005)

D Sarooshi, 'Institutional Modes of Conflict Management' in (Co-authored chapter with Judge R. Higgins DBE, QC in J. Norton Moore, F. Tipson, and R. Turner, eds., National Security Law, 211-320 2005)

2003

D Akande, 'The Role of the International Court of Justice in the Maintenance of International Peace' in N. White (ed), Collective Security Law (Ashgate 2003)

This publication reproduces, in a collection of seminal works on collective security, an article first published in (1996) 8 African Journal of International Comparative Law. The chapter examiners the role and record of the international court in the settlement of disputes which are likely to affect international peace.


A V Lowe and others, 'Comments on Chapters 16 and 17' in M. Byers & G. Nolte (eds), United States Hegemony and the Foundations of International Law (Cambridge University Press 2003)

2002

A V Lowe, 'Foreword' in Michael Likosky (ed), Transnational Legal Processes: Globalisation and Power Disparities (Butterworths 2002)

0

D Sarooshi, 'The United Nations Security Council' in J. Krieger, M. Crahan, C. Murphy, and A. Kaya (eds), The Oxford Companion to International Relations ( 0)

Edited books

2011

A Russell and A Russell (eds), The Right to Water: Theory, Practice and Prospects (CUP 2011)

2010

G S Goodwin-Gill, Sir Ian Brownlie CBE QC and Guy S. Goodwin-Gill (eds), Brownlie's Documents on Human Rights (Oxford: Oxford University Press 2010)

An extensive updated collection of key documents covering all elements of the subject, plus commentary and bibliographic annotation. Organized by reference to UN instruments, UN sponsored conventions, ILO, UNESCO, and regional instruments.


ISBN: 978-0-19-956404-0

2009

D Akande (ed), Oxford Companion to International Criminal Justice (Oxford University Press 2009)

The Oxford Companion to International Criminal Justice is the first major reference work to provide a complete overview of this emerging field. Its nearly 1100 pages are divided into three sections. In the first part, 21 essays by leading thinkers offer a comprehensive survey of issues and debates surrounding international humanitarian law, international criminal law, and their enforcement. The second part is arranged alphabetically, containing 320 entries on doctrines, procedures, institutions and personalities. The final part contains over 400 case summaries on different trials from international and domestic courts dealing with war crimes, crimes against humanity, genocide, torture, and terrorism. With analysis and commentary on every aspect of international criminal justice, this Companion is designed to be the first port of call for scholars and practitioners interested in current developments in international justice.


ISBN: 978-0-19-923832-3

Internet Publications

2011

D Akande, The Genocide Convention and the Obligation of Cooperation with the International Criminal Court (2011) UCLA Human Rights and International Criminal Law Online Forum (2011)

The International Court of Justice (ICJ) has held that Article VI of the Genocide Convention imposes an implicit obligation on Contracting Parties to cooperate with an “international penal tribunal” that has jurisdiction over persons charged with genocide. Although it was envisaged in the drafting of the Convention that acceptance of such jurisdiction would occur by treaty, the ICC is to be regarded as a competent international penal tribunal under the Genocide Convention even in cases where the ICC exercises jurisdiction on the basis of a Security Council referral. This creates an obligation on parties to cooperate with the ICC where an accused person is charged with genocide. However, under the jurisprudence of the ICJ this obligation of cooperation only arises where the contracting party in question has not only accepted the jurisdiction of the tribunal but also has a pre-existing obligation to cooperate. Applying this precedent would mean that in the Bashir case, only those States that are parties to the ICC Statute have an obligation of cooperation under the Genocide Convention. However, a teleological interpretation of the Convention would permit use of the Genocide Convention as a basis for creating an obligation of cooperation for non-parties since they must be deemed to have accepted the jurisdiction of the ICC over the case by virtue of a binding Security Council resolution conferring such jurisdiction. Relying on the Genocide Convention as a basis for a cooperation would open up alternative arguments allowing ICC parties (and non-parties if the teleological interpretation were adopted) to bypass immunities otherwise provided for in international law.


I Papanicolopulu, A Response to Milanovic on Extraterritorial Application of Human Treaties: The Significance of International Law Concepts of Jurisdiction (2011) EJIL:Talk!

I Papanicolopulu, Mauritius v. United Kingdom: Submission of the dispute on the Marine Protected Area around the Chagos Archipelago to arbitration (2011) Ejil:Talk!

2010

D Akande, What Exactly Was Agreed in Kampala on the Crime of Aggression? (2010) 2 Equality of Arms Review 23

I Papanicolopulu, Mediterranean Sea (2010)

Paparinskis, Sapphire Arbitration (2010) Max Planck Encyclopaedia of Public International Law

Paparinskis, Singapore Oil Stocks Case (2010) Max Planck Encyclopaedia of Public International Law

2008

D Akande, Several short pieces, notes and comments on EJIL:Talk! (2008) Blog of the European Journal of International Law

D Akande, The Bashir Indictment: Are Serving Heads of State Immune from ICC Prosecution? (2008) Debating International Justice in Africa: Oxford Transitional Justice Research Essays, 2008-2010 87

Others

2010

D Akande, Prosecuting Aggression: The Consent Problem and the Role of the Security Council (2010)

This paper focuses on the conditions which ought to exist before the International Criminal Court can exercise jurisdiction over the crime of aggression. In particular, it addresses (i) whether the Court should be competent to exercise jurisdiction where the alleged aggressor State has either not accepted the amendment on aggression, or is not a party to the ICC Statute and (ii) whether ICC jurisdiction on aggression should be made dependent on the prior approval of the United Nations Security Council. The first issue is referred to here as the “consent problem” and the second the “Security Council problem/issue”. This paper argues that the consent problem raises a fundamental question of deeper significance than the textual or perhaps technical issues concerning the way in which the amendment concerning aggression might come into force under Article 121 of the Statute. The consent problem raises fundamental issues about the nature of the ICC as an international tribunal and about the principles governing the competence of international tribunals under international law. In particular, the consent issue raises important questions about the jurisdiction of international tribunals over non-consenting States and whether the ICC is to be regarded as bound by rules of international law that would ordinarily bind other international tribunals. This paper, outlines and explains the principle of consent as applied to the competence of international tribunals. There is a detailed discussion, in Section 2, of the application of the principle to cases before international tribunals where the tribunal is called upon to determine the rights and obligations of States not before the tribunal. In particular, this section discusses the Monetary Gold principle enunciated by the International Court of Justice. According to that principle, the Court will not adjudicate on a case where the Court would be required, as a necessary prerequisite, to adjudicate on the rights or responsibilities of a non-consenting and absent third State. It is argued that this principle is simply an application of the more general principle of consent and that the principle is derived from the more fundamental principle of the independence of States, i.e. the idea that States are not subject to external authority of other States or institutions created by other States. The paper argues, in Section 3, that because a determination that an individual has committed the crime of aggression requires a prior determination that a State has committed an act of aggression and a breach of the UN Charter, the ICC would act in violation of the consent principle in cases contemplated by the aggression amendment. The paper then turns, in Section 4, to an examination of whether the consent principle and the Monetary Gold principle (which is an application of that more general principle) are applicable to international criminal tribunals in general and to the ICC in particular. Referring to the case law of other tribunals, it is argued that these principles apply to all international tribunals and that the form in which the proceedings involving adjudication of the responsibilities of other States takes place is irrelevant to their application. Section 5 examines which States are to be regarded as non-consenting States for the purpose of the application of the consent principle. I then turn to the Nuremberg and Tokyo precedents in Section 6. I argue that the establishment and operation of these tribunals would not support the view that a rule has developed permitting departure from the consent principle in international criminal tribunals. I argue that neither tribunal was truly international and that in any event, in both cases, there was the consent of the relevant sovereign authority. The paper considers, in Section 7, whether the jurisdiction of the ICC over aggression can be justified on the basis of a transfer of authority from the State that is the alleged victim of aggression. It is argued that though victim States can prosecute for aggression and though transferred jurisdiction is an appropriate justification for the jurisdiction of the ICC in general, the principles and precedents which support transfers of jurisdiction to international tribunal do not apply to aggression. Section 8 returns to the Security Council issue and considers whether prior determination by the Council (or by the General Assembly or ICJ) would fall within an exception to the Monetary Gold principle. It is argued that the best way to expand the jurisdiction of the Court to non-consenting States while respecting the principle of consent is by referral of situations to the Court by the Council. When the consent problem is taken into account, the role of the Security Council in making referrals to the ICC with regard to aggression is not a limit on the competence of the Court. Rather the Security Council comes to the aid of the Court and expands its jurisdiction to situations where the ICC would otherwise be legally incompetent to act. On this view, giving the Security Council almost exclusive competence with regard to aggression cases is not to be regarded as a problem to be overcome, but rather as a means of overcoming an existing problem. The final section is the main theoretical contribution of the piece, considering whether the deviation from the consent principle contemplated with regard to the ICC’s jurisdiction over aggression is to be regarded as an evolution of the law or instead a violation.


D Akande and others, Submission to the Iraq Inquiry on the UK's Legal Justification for the Iraq War and Lord Goldsmith's Legal Advice (2010) Submission to the Chilcott Inquiry on Iraq

1999

D Akande, Prosecuting Heads of States: The Implications of the Milosevic and Pinochet Cases\", (1999) 5 Strategic Comments (International Institute for Strategic Studies)

0

D Sarooshi, 'Aspects of the World Trade Organization’s Telecommunications Regime' Technology Disputes International 2

Reviews

1995

D Akande, 'Review of National Treaty Law and Practice: France, Germany, India, Switzerland, Thailand and the United Kingdom, Monroe Leigh and Merritt R. Blakeslee (eds.), (ASIL, 1995)' (1995) 7 African Journal of International and Comparative Law 215   [Review]

Reports

1994

D Sarooshi, 'Humanitarian Intervention and Humanitarian Assistance: Law and Practice' (1994) 86 Wilton Park Papers (HMSO) 1

Courses

The courses we offer in this field are:

Undergraduate

FHS - Final Year (Phase III)

The degree is awarded on the basis of nine final examinations at the end of the three-year course (or four years in the case of Law with Law Studies in Europe). Phase II of the Final Honour School includes the first and second term of the final year; the Final Examinations are taken in the third term of the final year.

Public International Law

There has never been a more exciting time to study Public International Law (PIL). Issues of PIL and international justice are at the forefront of public debates to a greater degree than ever before. International law provides the technical and intellectual underpinnings to large areas of international co-operation, including the prosecution of war crimes (both internationally and nationally), the legality of the use of force against States (e.g. Iraq), environmental protection, the scope of human rights protection (e.g. the ‘war on terrorism’), the economic effects of globalisation promoted through the work of institutions such as the World Trade Organization, the settlement of land and maritime boundary disputes, and the resolution of jurisdictional conflicts arising in the context of anti-trust and other forms of economic regulation by States. PIL today not only impacts and shapes decisions by States to a greater degree than ever before, but it also penetrates into the national legal order – often through national court decisions – to give rights to individuals and corporations to an extent that is unrivalled in the history of the subject. These developments have in turn led to the growth of lawyers and law firms who specialise in the practice of PIL. This is in addition to the demand for PIL lawyers in governments, inter-governmental organizations (such as the United Nations and the large number of UN Specialized Agencies), and non-governmental organizations.. For those who do not intend to follow a career in international law, the subject provides a broad sweep of issues which illuminate not merely questions of international law but the problems and processes of the world of diplomacy. The PIL course at Oxford covers the major areas of general international law and is not over-specialized. The lectures cover the core tutorial topics on the nature and sources of international law, the law of treaties, international legal personality, jurisdiction and immunities, the law of foreign investment, State responsibility, the use of force and the procedures for peaceful settlement of disputes. In addition, the lectures introduce students to special areas such the law of the sea, international criminal law, international environmental law, international economic law and investment arbitration. The consideration of these subject areas takes place within their broader policy context and having regard to recent experience. Although in principle the syllabus is extensive, both the teaching practice and the mode of setting the FHS paper avoid any drawbacks which might result from this wide scope. Thus, different teachers will focus on different selected topics, and the student will find that it is not necessary to know the whole syllabus from A to Z. In the same context, the Schools paper provides a wide selection of questions.

Diploma in Legal Studies

Public International Law

There has never been a more exciting time to study Public International Law (PIL). Issues of PIL and international justice are at the forefront of public debates to a greater degree than ever before. International law provides the technical and intellectual underpinnings to large areas of international co-operation, including the prosecution of war crimes (both internationally and nationally), the legality of the use of force against States (e.g. Iraq), environmental protection, the scope of human rights protection (e.g. the ‘war on terrorism’), the economic effects of globalisation promoted through the work of institutions such as the World Trade Organization, the settlement of land and maritime boundary disputes, and the resolution of jurisdictional conflicts arising in the context of anti-trust and other forms of economic regulation by States. PIL today not only impacts and shapes decisions by States to a greater degree than ever before, but it also penetrates into the national legal order – often through national court decisions – to give rights to individuals and corporations to an extent that is unrivalled in the history of the subject. These developments have in turn led to the growth of lawyers and law firms who specialise in the practice of PIL. This is in addition to the demand for PIL lawyers in governments, inter-governmental organizations (such as the United Nations and the large number of UN Specialized Agencies), and non-governmental organizations.. For those who do not intend to follow a career in international law, the subject provides a broad sweep of issues which illuminate not merely questions of international law but the problems and processes of the world of diplomacy. The PIL course at Oxford covers the major areas of general international law and is not over-specialized. The lectures cover the core tutorial topics on the nature and sources of international law, the law of treaties, international legal personality, jurisdiction and immunities, the law of foreign investment, State responsibility, the use of force and the procedures for peaceful settlement of disputes. In addition, the lectures introduce students to special areas such the law of the sea, international criminal law, international environmental law, international economic law and investment arbitration. The consideration of these subject areas takes place within their broader policy context and having regard to recent experience. Although in principle the syllabus is extensive, both the teaching practice and the mode of setting the FHS paper avoid any drawbacks which might result from this wide scope. Thus, different teachers will focus on different selected topics, and the student will find that it is not necessary to know the whole syllabus from A to Z. In the same context, the Schools paper provides a wide selection of questions.

Postgraduate

BCL

European Union as an Actor in International Law (not offered in 2011-12)

The process of European integration has entailed a transfer of foreign relations powers from the Member States to the European Union (EU) that does not follow the lines of any other legal development. It is different from the experience of federal States, in so far as the devolution of foreign relations powers is only partial, and it has certainly not entailed the disappearance of the Member States as international legal persons. On the other hand, the quantity and the quality of the functions exercised by the EU on the international plane, and its capacity to develop its own course of foreign relations, makes it an entity with few, if any, traces of resemblance with other existing international organisations.

The course deals with questions at the intersection of European law, public international law, and international relations. It looks both to the inside, giving an overview of the foreign relations law of the EU, and to the outside, examining the legal framework in which the EU acts on the international plane. Looking at some of the core areas of international law, the course examines the problems of and prospects for a supra-national actor in a legal system which is still largely dominated by States. The ultimate question to be explored: Is international law adapting to a new actor or must the EU assume statehood to be a full actor in international law?

The course covers the following topics: the foreign relations law of the EU, the relationship between international law and European law, treaty relations of the EU and its member States (mixed agreements), the EU as a creator of customary international law, the EU as a member of international organizations and a party before international tribunals, international relations and diplomatic powers of the EU, promotion and enforcement of international law by the EU (sanctions, human rights, standards of democratic governance), the transatlantic divide between the EU and the US on matters of international law, violations of international law by the EU and its member States and their international responsibility.

The course is directed at graduates with an interest both in international law and European law. Basic knowledge of these subjects is an advantage. Students without such knowledge will be directed to basic reading in these fields.

International Dispute Settlement

The course on International Dispute Settlement is concerned with the peaceful settlement of disputes involving the application of international law, including inter-State disputes, and disputes between States and individuals or corporations.

One part of the course is concerned with the study of a range of institutions concerned with dispute settlement such as arbitral tribunals, the International Court of Justice, and more specialised bodies such as the International Centre for the Settlement of Investment Disputes, the World Trade Organisation, and other institutions handling economic and political disputes. The institutions selected for study vary from year to year.

The second part of the course provides an outline of the principles of procedural law that operate in international tribunals, including international commercial arbitration tribunals. This part of the course involves the study of issues such as jurisdiction and admissibility, the determination of law governing procedure and the law governing the merits of a case, remedies, the recognition and enforcement of judgments and awards, and the review of judgments and awards.

International Economic Law

This course introduces students to the main principles and institutions of international economic law. It focuses primarily on the institutions and substantive law of the World Trade Organisation (WTO) and the General Agreement on Tariffs and Trade (GATT). In addition to introducing participants to the major legal disciplines under the GATT/WTO and the basic principles and cores concepts of the GATT/WTO (Base on in-depth study of the relevant GATT/WTO case law), the course considers the underlying philosophy of free trade and a number of the controversies concerning the future evolution of the WTO and its relationship to globalisation, regionalism, and the attempt by States to achieve other policy objectives (such as protection of the environment). No prior knowledge of international law or economics is necessary. Students without such knowledge will be directed to basic reading in these fields.

International Law and Armed Conflict (not offered in 2011-12)

This course will examine the international law issues which arise in relation to armed conflicts. One of the themes running through the course will be how international law regulates cross-border conflicts involving non-State actors. The course will be divided into two parts. Part one will consider the international legal issues relating to whether and when States are entitled to use armed force. In this part of the course, we will examine the content of the prohibition of the use of force contained in the UN Charter as well as the exceptions to that prohibition. In particular, we will examine the scope of self-defence in international law, (especially as it applies to attacks by non-State groups). Questions to be considered include the criteria for a lawful response in self-defence and the legality of anticipatory/preemptive self defence. This part of the course will also consider other possible exceptions to the prohibition of the use of force - such as the doctrine of humanitarian intervention or responsibility to protect. The last section of the first part of the course will examine the powers of the United Nations to authorize the use of force for peacekeeping and peace enforcement. The second part of the course examines the law that applies during an armed conflict. We will address the distinction between the law applicable to international armed conflicts and that applicable to non-international armed conflicts. We also consider the extent to the which the so called “Global War on Terror: should be considered an armed conflict to which international humanitarian law applies. In this part, we will also gain an overview of the “Geneva law” relating to the humanitarian protection of victims of war and the “Hague law” relating to the means and methods of warfare. In particular, we will examine the distinction between combatants and non-combatants and the law that applies to the detention of lawful and unlawful combatants in time of armed conflict. We then turn to the law that applies to the conduct of hostilities, examining in particular the rules relating to targeting and weaponry. Finally, we consider the extent to which international human rights law applies in time of armed conflict.

International Law of the Sea

The Law of the Sea course is concerned with public international law and not with commercial shipping law.

The course provides a comprehensive grounding in the subject, combining the study of maritime zones (such as the territorial sea, Exclusive Economic Zone, Continental Shelf and High Seas), with the study of the main bodies of law regulating users of the seas (such as navigation, fishing, pollution, scientific research and military activities).

The teaching involves relating the problems of the law of the sea to underlying principles and policy factors and to other relevant areas of general international law, including sources, the law of treaties and principles of state responsibility.

MJur

Public International Law (also part of the BA course)

There has never been a more exciting time to study Public International Law (PIL). Issues of PIL and international justice are at the forefront of public debates to a greater degree than ever before. International law provides the technical and intellectual underpinnings to large areas of international co-operation, including the prosecution of war crimes (both internationally and nationally), the legality of the use of force against States (e.g. Iraq), environmental protection, the scope of human rights protection (e.g. the ‘war on terrorism’), the economic effects of globalisation promoted through the work of institutions such as the World Trade Organization, the settlement of land and maritime boundary disputes, and the resolution of jurisdictional conflicts arising in the context of anti-trust and other forms of economic regulation by States. PIL today not only impacts and shapes decisions by States to a greater degree than ever before, but it also penetrates into the national legal order – often through national court decisions – to give rights to individuals and corporations to an extent that is unrivalled in the history of the subject. These developments have in turn led to the growth of lawyers and law firms who specialise in the practice of PIL. This is in addition to the demand for PIL lawyers in governments, inter-governmental organizations (such as the United Nations and the large number of UN Specialized Agencies), and non-governmental organizations.. For those who do not intend to follow a career in international law, the subject provides a broad sweep of issues which illuminate not merely questions of international law but the problems and processes of the world of diplomacy. The PIL course at Oxford covers the major areas of general international law and is not over-specialized. The lectures cover the core tutorial topics on the nature and sources of international law, the law of treaties, international legal personality, jurisdiction and immunities, the law of foreign investment, State responsibility, the use of force and the procedures for peaceful settlement of disputes. In addition, the lectures introduce students to special areas such the law of the sea, international criminal law, international environmental law, international economic law and investment arbitration. The consideration of these subject areas takes place within their broader policy context and having regard to recent experience. Although in principle the syllabus is extensive, both the teaching practice and the mode of setting the FHS paper avoid any drawbacks which might result from this wide scope. Thus, different teachers will focus on different selected topics, and the student will find that it is not necessary to know the whole syllabus from A to Z. In the same context, the Schools paper provides a wide selection of questions.

European Union as an Actor in International Law (not offered in 2011-12)

The process of European integration has entailed a transfer of foreign relations powers from the Member States to the European Union (EU) that does not follow the lines of any other legal development. It is different from the experience of federal States, in so far as the devolution of foreign relations powers is only partial, and it has certainly not entailed the disappearance of the Member States as international legal persons. On the other hand, the quantity and the quality of the functions exercised by the EU on the international plane, and its capacity to develop its own course of foreign relations, makes it an entity with few, if any, traces of resemblance with other existing international organisations.

The course deals with questions at the intersection of European law, public international law, and international relations. It looks both to the inside, giving an overview of the foreign relations law of the EU, and to the outside, examining the legal framework in which the EU acts on the international plane. Looking at some of the core areas of international law, the course examines the problems of and prospects for a supra-national actor in a legal system which is still largely dominated by States. The ultimate question to be explored: Is international law adapting to a new actor or must the EU assume statehood to be a full actor in international law?

The course covers the following topics: the foreign relations law of the EU, the relationship between international law and European law, treaty relations of the EU and its member States (mixed agreements), the EU as a creator of customary international law, the EU as a member of international organizations and a party before international tribunals, international relations and diplomatic powers of the EU, promotion and enforcement of international law by the EU (sanctions, human rights, standards of democratic governance), the transatlantic divide between the EU and the US on matters of international law, violations of international law by the EU and its member States and their international responsibility.

The course is directed at graduates with an interest both in international law and European law. Basic knowledge of these subjects is an advantage. Students without such knowledge will be directed to basic reading in these fields.

International Dispute Settlement

The course on International Dispute Settlement is concerned with the peaceful settlement of disputes involving the application of international law, including inter-State disputes, and disputes between States and individuals or corporations.

One part of the course is concerned with the study of a range of institutions concerned with dispute settlement such as arbitral tribunals, the International Court of Justice, and more specialised bodies such as the International Centre for the Settlement of Investment Disputes, the World Trade Organisation, and other institutions handling economic and political disputes. The institutions selected for study vary from year to year.

The second part of the course provides an outline of the principles of procedural law that operate in international tribunals, including international commercial arbitration tribunals. This part of the course involves the study of issues such as jurisdiction and admissibility, the determination of law governing procedure and the law governing the merits of a case, remedies, the recognition and enforcement of judgments and awards, and the review of judgments and awards.

International Economic Law

This course introduces students to the main principles and institutions of international economic law. It focuses primarily on the institutions and substantive law of the World Trade Organisation (WTO) and the General Agreement on Tariffs and Trade (GATT). In addition to introducing participants to the major legal disciplines under the GATT/WTO and the basic principles and cores concepts of the GATT/WTO (Base on in-depth study of the relevant GATT/WTO case law), the course considers the underlying philosophy of free trade and a number of the controversies concerning the future evolution of the WTO and its relationship to globalisation, regionalism, and the attempt by States to achieve other policy objectives (such as protection of the environment). No prior knowledge of international law or economics is necessary. Students without such knowledge will be directed to basic reading in these fields.

International Law and Armed Conflict (not offered in 2011-12)

This course will examine the international law issues which arise in relation to armed conflicts. One of the themes running through the course will be how international law regulates cross-border conflicts involving non-State actors. The course will be divided into two parts. Part one will consider the international legal issues relating to whether and when States are entitled to use armed force. In this part of the course, we will examine the content of the prohibition of the use of force contained in the UN Charter as well as the exceptions to that prohibition. In particular, we will examine the scope of self-defence in international law, (especially as it applies to attacks by non-State groups). Questions to be considered include the criteria for a lawful response in self-defence and the legality of anticipatory/preemptive self defence. This part of the course will also consider other possible exceptions to the prohibition of the use of force - such as the doctrine of humanitarian intervention or responsibility to protect. The last section of the first part of the course will examine the powers of the United Nations to authorize the use of force for peacekeeping and peace enforcement. The second part of the course examines the law that applies during an armed conflict. We will address the distinction between the law applicable to international armed conflicts and that applicable to non-international armed conflicts. We also consider the extent to the which the so called “Global War on Terror: should be considered an armed conflict to which international humanitarian law applies. In this part, we will also gain an overview of the “Geneva law” relating to the humanitarian protection of victims of war and the “Hague law” relating to the means and methods of warfare. In particular, we will examine the distinction between combatants and non-combatants and the law that applies to the detention of lawful and unlawful combatants in time of armed conflict. We then turn to the law that applies to the conduct of hostilities, examining in particular the rules relating to targeting and weaponry. Finally, we consider the extent to which international human rights law applies in time of armed conflict.

International Law of the Sea

The Law of the Sea course is concerned with public international law and not with commercial shipping law.

The course provides a comprehensive grounding in the subject, combining the study of maritime zones (such as the territorial sea, Exclusive Economic Zone, Continental Shelf and High Seas), with the study of the main bodies of law regulating users of the seas (such as navigation, fishing, pollution, scientific research and military activities).

The teaching involves relating the problems of the law of the sea to underlying principles and policy factors and to other relevant areas of general international law, including sources, the law of treaties and principles of state responsibility.

MSc (Master's in Law and Finance)

International Economic Law

This course introduces students to the main principles and institutions of international economic law. It focuses primarily on the institutions and substantive law of the World Trade Organisation (WTO) and the General Agreement on Tariffs and Trade (GATT). In addition to introducing participants to the major legal disciplines under the GATT/WTO and the basic principles and cores concepts of the GATT/WTO (Base on in-depth study of the relevant GATT/WTO case law), the course considers the underlying philosophy of free trade and a number of the controversies concerning the future evolution of the WTO and its relationship to globalisation, regionalism, and the attempt by States to achieve other policy objectives (such as protection of the environment). No prior knowledge of international law or economics is necessary. Students without such knowledge will be directed to basic reading in these fields.


People

Public International Law teaching is organized by a Subject Group convened by:

Dan Sarooshi: Professor of Public International Law

in conjunction with:

Dapo Akande: University Lecturer in Public International Law
Sir Frank Berman, QC: Visiting Professor in International Law
Janina Dill: Junior Research Fellow in Socio-Legal Studies
Nancy Eisenhauer: College Lecturer
Nazila Ghanea: University Lecturer in International Human Rights Law
Guy S. Goodwin-Gill: Senior Research Fellow, All Souls College
Mark Janis: Visiting Lecturer
Vaughan Lowe, QC: Chichele Professor of Public International Law
Catherine MacKenzie: Fellow at the Environmental Change Institute
Violeta Moreno Lax: Stipendiary Lecturer in Law
Nicola Palmer: Junior Research Fellow in Global Justice
Irini Papanicolopulu: Marie Curie Fellow
Martins Paparinskis: Junior Research Fellow
Andrew Shacknove: University Lecturer in Law (Department of Continuing Education)
Jure Vidmar: Anglo-German Fellow
Katja Ziegler: Reader in European and Comparative Law, Erich Brost University Lecturer

assisted by:

Caitlin Goss: DPhil student
Erik Labelle Eastaugh: MSt Legal Research student

Also working in this field, but not involved in its teaching programme:

Clara Feliciati: DPhil Law student
Jarrod Hepburn: DPhil student
Anna Russell: Louwes Fellow


© Faculty of Law :: image credits & permissions
page updated on 11 January 2012 at 16:53
Feedback on this page

the faculty of law at the university of oxford

you are here: themes - Public International Law