Constitutional and Administrative Law — Overview
Forthcoming Subject Events
May 2013
Thursday 30 May 2013 Week 6
- Public Law Discussion Group
Independent Reviewers of Anti-Terrorism Laws as Effective Oversight Mechanisms: Australia and the UK Compared - Speaker: Jessie Blackbourn, Postdoctoral Research Fellow, UNSW
Oxford Law Faculty Senior Common Room at 12:30
June 2013
Tuesday 4 June Week 7
- Public Law Discussion Group
The Coherence of the Doctrine of Legitimate Expectations - Speaker: Dr Farrah Ahmed and Dr Adam Perry, Melbourne Law School and University of Aberdeen, School of Law, respectively
Oxford Law Faculty Senior Common Room at 12:30
Publications
Showing all[*] publications sorted by title [change this]
Showing all 65 Constitutional and Administrative Law publications currently held in our database
Change to sort them by year | name | type OR
Show only Recent | Selected publications
A C L Davies, 'A tangled web? Accountability and the commissioning role in the "new" NHS' (2007) 18 King's Law Journal 387 [...]
Article analysing recent reforms in the primary care sector in the NHS from a public law perspective.
ISBN: 0961-5768
P P Craig, 'Access to Mechanisms of Administrative Law' in D Feldman (ed), English Public Law (Oxford University Press 2009)
Sophie Boyron and A C L Davies, 'Accountability and Public Contracts' in Rozen Noguellou and Ulrich Stelkens (eds), Treatise on the Comparative Law of Public Contracts (Bruylant 2011)
TAO Endicott, Administrative Law (2nd edn, OUP 2011)
P P Craig, 'Administrative Law' in L Blom-Cooper, B Dickson and G Drewry (eds), The Judicial House of Lords 1876-2009 (Oxford University Press 2009)
P P Craig, Administrative Law (6th edn, Sweet & Maxwell 2008)
P P Craig, 'Britain in the European Union' in J Jowell and D Oliver (eds), The Changing Constitution (Oxford University Press 2011)
R Williams and Professor Christopher F. Forsyth, 'Closing Chapter in the Immigrant Children Saga: Substantive Legitimate Expectations and Administrative Justice in Hong Kong' (2002) 10 Asia Pacific Law Review 29 [...]
Article discussing the closing stages of a series of judgments given by the Court of Final Appeal in Hong Kong concerning the interpretation of Article 24 of the Basic Law on the right of residence in Hong Kong. The piece argues that the Hong Kong executive, Legal Aid Board and Court system all found the technique of informal communication useful in managing claims for residence, but that the usefulness of this technique on future occasions is dependent on full protection being given to the expectations it creates so that trust in the administration can be maintained. The article also discusses some of the general background theory and doctrine concerning legitimate expectations in administrative law more generally and argues that although the courts are often concerned with the numbers of people claiming legitimate expectations, in fact there may be more subtle issues to consider such as whether the class of persons is finite and identifiable.
ISBN: 1019-2557
J M Finnis, 'Common Law Constraints: Whose Common Good Counts?' (2008) Oxford Legal Studies Research Paper 10/2008 [...]
Examines the history and meaning of the Colonial Laws Validity Act 1865 as it bears on the issues in Bancoult (No.2); critiques the constitutional theory deployed in Quark Fishing.
J M Finnis, 'Commonwealth and Dependencies' in Halsbury's Laws of England, 4th edn. (Lexis Nexis UK 2003) [...]
Title in Halsbury's Laws of England, vol. 6 reissue.
ISBN: 406961662
A L Young, 'Deference, Dialogue and the Search for Legitimacy' (2010) Oxford Journal of Legal Studies 815 [...]
DOI: 10.1093/ojls/gqq028
This review article discusses the relationship between deference and the presumption of constitutionality, as discussed in Brian Foley’s book, Deference and the Presumption of Constitutionality. Foley argues for the rejection of the presumption of constitutionality as it operates in the Irish Constitution, proposing instead a ‘due deference’ approach. This approach would require courts to give varying degrees of weight to the legislature’s conclusions that particular legislative provisions are constitutional. The article praises Foley’s book, particularly its stronger justification of due deference which focuses on its ability to foster a culture of justification which, in turn, facilitates popular sovereignty. The review also provides a criticism of the argument made in the book and discusses its application to the UK constitution. First, the review argues that the focus on constitutional as opposed to institutional factors to determine deference may, in practice, undermine Foley’s justification of due deference. Second it argues that Foley’s justification of deference may be best served in the UK constitution by a theory of democratic dialogue as opposed to the application of due deference.
D Erdos, Delegating Rights Protection: The Rise of Bills of Rights in the Westminster World (Oxford University Press 2010) [...]
Delegating Rights Protection explores bill-of-rights outcomes in four "Westminster" countries - Australia, Canada, New Zealand, and the United Kingdom - whose development exhibit an interesting combination of both commonality and difference. Comparative analysis of some thirty-six democracies demonstrates that the historic absence of a bill of rights in Westminster countries is best explained by, firstly, the absence of a clear political transition and, secondly, their strong British constitutional heritage. Detailed chapters then explore recent and much more diversified developments. In all the countries, postmaterialist socio-economic change has resulted in a growing emphasis on legal formalization, codified civil liberties, and social equality. Pressure for a bill of rights has therefore increased. Nevertheless, by enhancing judicial power, bills of rights conflict with the prima facie positional interests of the political elite. Given this, change in this area has also required a political trigger which provides an immediate rationale for change. Alongside social forces, the nature of this trigger determines the strength and substance of the bill of rights enacted. The statutory Canadian Bill of Rights Act (1960), New Zealand Bill of Rights Act (1990), and the Human Rights Act (UK) (1998) were prompted politically by a relatively weak and backward-looking 'aversive' reaction against perceived abuses of power under the previous administration. Meanwhile, the fully constitutional Canadian Charter (1982) had its political origins in a stronger, more self-interested and prospective need to find a new unifying institution to counter the destabilizing, centripetal power of the Québécois nationalist movement. Finally, the absence of any relevant political trigger explains the failure of national bill of rights initiatives in Australia. The conclusionary section of the book argues that this Postmaterialist Trigger Thesis (PTT) explanation of change can also explain the origins of bills of rights in other internally stable, advanced democracies, notably the Israeli Basic Laws on human rights (1992).
ISBN: 9780199557769
A L Young, 'Democracy through law' [2006] Public Law 873 [Review] [...]
Book review of Johan Steyn, Democracy through Law.
ISBN: 0033-3565
D J Galligan, 'Discretion Revisited: From Autonomy to Sound Judgement' in A. Ruiz Ojeda (ed), To be settled (to be entered 2013) (forthcoming) [...]
A reassessment of the concept of discretion in the regulatory context, the argument being that discretion as autonomy has to be modified by discretion in its original meaning as sound judgement.
D J Galligan and Z. H. Zafirov, 'Discretionary Powers in Macedonia' (OSCE (Organizatioin for Security and Cooperation in Europe) 1 2011)
P P Craig and others, 'England and Wales' (2010) 338
A C L Davies, 'English Law’s Treatment of Government Contracts: The Problem of Wider Public Interests' in J.-B. Auby and M. Freedland (eds), The Public Law/Private Law Divide: une entente assez cordiale? (Hart Publishing 2006) [...]
Discussion of some of the ultra vires problems surrounding government contracts.
ISBN: 1-84113-635-2
P P Craig, 'Equality, Review and the Crown’s Power to Disburse Funds' (2007) 19 European Review of Public Law 845
A C L Davies, 'Foundation Hospitals: A New Approach to Accountability and Autonomy in the Delivery of Public Services?' [2004] Public Law 808 [...]
Questions whether the government's proposals to create NHS Foundation Trusts will succeed in their aim of giving hospitals greater autonomy from Department of Health control.
ISBN: 0033-3565
P P Craig, 'Fundamental Principles of Administrative Law' in D Feldman (ed), English Public Law (Oxford University Press 2009)
P P Craig, 'Fundamental Rights' in P Moser and K Sawyer (eds), Making Community Law, The Legacy of Advocate General Jacobs at the European Court of Justice (Edward Elgar 2008)
P P Craig, 'Grounds for Judicial Review: Substantive Control over Discretion' in D Feldman (ed), English Public Law (Oxford University Press 2009)
A L Young, 'In Defence of Due Deference' (2009) 72 Modern Law Review 554 [...]
The doctrine of deference permeates human rights review. It plays a role in de¢ning Convention rights, in determining the nature of the proportionality test applied when analysing non-absolute rights, as well as in deciding the stringency of its application. The role of deference has recently been subjected to both judicial and academic criticism, some of which advocates the demise of the doctrine. This article develops a contextual account of deference that is justi¢ed for epistemic reasons, rather than reasons of relative authority. This conception is able to withstand current criticism and ismodest enough to play a role in a range of di¡erent justi¢cations and understandings of judicial review under theHuman Rights Act.The article then provides amore detailed account of deference, taking account of the relative institutional features of the legislature, executive and judiciary, without running the risk that the court fails to performits constitutional function of protecting individual rights.
J M Finnis, 'Invoking the Principle of Legality against the Rule of Law' in Richard Ekins (ed), Modern Challenges to the Rule of Law (LexisNexis, Wellington 2011) [...]
Critique of Lords decision in Purdy and discussion of the Director Public Prosecutions guidelines on prosecution for assisting suicide
J M Finnis, 'Invoking the Principle of Legality against the Rule of Law' (2011) New Zealand Law Review [2010] 601-616 601 [...]
Critique of Lords' decision in Purdy and of the prosecutorial guidelines issued in conformity with that decision.
A L Young, 'Is Dialogue Working under the Human Rights Act 1998?' [2011] Public Law 773
D J Galligan (ed), Judicial Review of Administrative Action in English Law (Giuffre' 2008)
A C L Davies, 'Le droit anglais face aux contrats administratifs: en l'absence de principes generaux garantissant l'interet public, une maison sans fondation?' (2006) 22(5) Revue Francaise de Droit Administratif 1039 [...]
Discussion of some of the problems with the English law of government contracts, for a French audience.
ISBN: 0763-1219
P P Craig, 'Legitimacy in Administrative Law: European Union' in M Ruffert (ed), Legitimacy in European Administrative Law: Reform and Reconstruction (Europa Law Publishing 2011)
P P Craig, 'Multilevel Governance and Accountability in the EU' in P Pavlopoulos and S Flogaitis (eds), Multilevel Governance and Administrative Reform in the 21st Century (Nomos 2008)
J M Finnis, 'Nationality, Alienage and Constitutional Principle' (2007) 123 Law Quarterly Review 418 [...]
After brief discussion of (1) the nature of constitutional principles and (2) the development and developed state of the law about the rights of aliens, the article argues extensively that A v Home Secretary [2004] UKHL 56, [2005] 2 AC 68 was wrongly decided and, indeed, per incuriam since all nine judges in the Lords overlooked their duty to interpet the statutory provision so far as possible as compatible with the Human Rights Act 1998 before declaring it incompatible.Even apart from that duty under HRA s. 3, there was available but unconsidered a reasonable interpretation such that the power to detain alien terrorist suspects had as its ongoing precondition a purpose, manifested in bona fide efforts, to deport them and to secure whatever arrangements with foreign governments might be necessary to make deportation lawful under the Chahal doctrine about real risk of torture or degrading treatment.The judgments all overlook also the constitutional principle that risk to the public good which must be accepted from the presence of a national need not be accepted from the presence of an alien and may be obviated by the alien's exclusion or expulsion.The majority's arguments from irrationality and discrimination are manifestly unsound once the statute is interpreted as it should have been.
P P Craig, 'Perspectives on Process: Common Law, Statutory and Political' (2010) Public Law 275
P P Craig, 'Political Constitutionalism and Judicial Review' in C Forsyth, M Elliott, S Jhaveri, M Ramsden, A Scully-Hill (eds), Effective Judicial Review, A Cornerstone of Good Governance (Oxford University Press 2010)
P P Craig, 'Political Constitutionalism and the Judicial Role: A Response' (2011) 9 International Journal of Constitutional Law 112
A L Young, 'Precedent' in Hoffman (ed), The Impact of the UK Human Rights Act on Private Law (Cambridge University Press 2011) [...]
The chapter explains and evaluates the different ways in which courts are bound to follow decisions of the ECtHR. It evaluates the role of section 2(1) HRA 1998, as well as analysing the extent to which courts should follow decisions of the ECtHR as opposed to a binding precedent from a concurrent or higher court.
ISBN: 9781107009325
P P Craig, 'Proportionality, Rationality and Review ' (2010) New Zealand Law Review 265
A Johnston, 'Putting the Cart Before the Horse? Privacy and the Wainwrights' (2004) Cambridge Law Journal 15 [Case Note]
N. W. Barber, 'Review of The New Separation of Powers' [2011] Public Law 428 [Review]
A Johnston, 'Review of: Danny Nicol, EC Membership and the Judicialization of British Politics' (2003) 40 Common Market Law Review 525 [Review]
A Johnston, 'Review of: Diana Woodhouse, The Office of the Lord Chancellor' (2002) Cambridge Law Journal 715 [Review]
P P Craig, 'Shared Administration and Networks: Global and EU Perspectives' in G Anthony, J-B Auby, J Morison and T Zwart (eds), Values in Global Administrative Law, Essays in Honour of Spyridon Flogaitis and Gerard Timsit (Hart Publishing 2011)
P P Craig, 'Sovereignty and the EU: The UK Perspective and Primacy Clauses' in L Tichy and T Dumbrovsky (eds), Sovereignty and Integration, Paradoxes and Development within Europe Today (Centre for Comparative Law, Law Faculty of Charles University in Prague 2010)
A L Young, 'Sovereignty: Demise, Afterlife or Partial Resurrection?' (2011) 9 International Journal of Constitutional law 163 [...]
DOI: 10.1093/icon/mor028
This article is a response to the contributions of Nick Barber and Trevor Allan found in this volume. It argues that an analysis of “sovereignty” does serve a useful purpose in U.K. constitutional law. More specifically, it argues that discussions of “sovereignty” should also include an analysis of constitutive rules, particularly aiming to understand which institutions are “sovereign” in the sense of having the power to define and modify these constitutive rules. When analysed in this manner, an argument can be made that Dicey's traditional theory that Parliament cannot bind its successors is still a valid rule of the English legal system. In addition, this rule is desirable. Its presence is necessary, although not sufficient, to ensure that both Parliament and the courts have a rule in defining and modifying constitutive rules. This dual role is desirable as it helps to maintain the legitimacy of the U.K.’s “political” constitution.
P P Craig, 'Specific Powers of Public Contractors' in R Noguellou and U Stelkens (eds), Comparative Law on Public Contracts (Bruylant 2010)
P P Craig, 'Substance and Procedure in Judicial Review' in M Andenas and D Fairgrieve (eds), Tom Bingham and the Transformation of the Law, A Liber Amicorum ( 2009)
P P Craig, 'The Administrative System and Administrative Law Principle in the UK' in HH Trute, T Grob, HC Rohl, C Mollers (eds), Allgemeines Verwaltungsrecht – zur Tragfahigkeit eines Konzepts ( 2008)
N. W. Barber, 'The Afterlife of Parliamentary Sovereignty' (2011) 9 International Journal of Constitutional Law 144
T Khaitan, 'The constitution as a statutory term' (2014) Law Quarterly Review (forthcoming)
Sidney Shapiro, E Fisher and Wendy Wagner, 'The Enlightment of Administrative Law: Looking Inside the Agency for Legitimacy' (2012) Wake Forest Law Review 463
A Kavanagh, 'The Irish Constitution at 75 Years: Natural Law, Christian Values and the Ideal of Justice' (2012) 48 Irish Jurist 71
J M Finnis, 'The Lords’ Eerie Swansong: A Note on R (Purdy) v Director of Public Prosecutions' (2009) Oxford Legal Studies Research Paper 31/2009
A Johnston and E. Nanopoulos, 'The New UK Supreme Court, the Separation of Powers and Anti-Terrorism Measures' (2010) Cambridge Law Journal 218 [Case Note]
A C L Davies, The Public Law of Government Contracts (Oxford University Press 2008) [...]
This book analyses the law relating to government contracts from a public law perspective.
ISBN: 978-0-19-928739-0
Wheatle, 'The Residual Powers of the Court' (2012) UK Constitutional Law Blog
A L Young, 'The Rule of Law in the United Kingdom: Formal or Substantive?' (2012) 6 International Constitutional Laww 259
N. W. Barber, 'The Separation of Powers and the British Constitution' (2012) Oxford Legal Studies Research Paper
N. W. Barber, 'The Separation of Powers in the British Constitution ' (2012) Law: The Journal of the Higher School of Economics 3
E Fisher, 'Transparency and Administrative Law: A Critical Evaluation' (2010) 63 Current Legal Problems 272
N. W. Barber, 'Two Meditations on the Thoughts of Many Minds ' (2010) 88 Texas Law Review 807
R Williams, 'When is an Error not an Error? Reform of Jurisdictional Review of Error of Law and Fact' [2007] 2007(Winter) Public Law 793
Courses
The courses we offer in this field are:
Undergraduate
Law Moderations (Phase I)
Law Moderations are preliminary examinations in Criminal Law, Constitutional Law, and Roman Law, taken at the end of the second term in the first year of the BA. Students must pass them in order to continue in the BA; the degree is awarded on the basis of the FHS Examinations.
[less]
This course covers the law of the constitution, including the structure and basic principles of the British constitution, and the impact of European Community law on the constitution. It also provides an introduction to the protection of human rights in English law.
Constitutional Law covers material in the “foundations of legal knowledge” and so must be taken by those seeking a profession qualification in England and Wales.Students taking the BA in Jurisprudence (Course 1 and Course 2) take Constitutional Law as one of the three papers for Law Moderations and will in general cover eight topics in tutorials. Students taking the BA in Jurisprudence with Senior Status may choose to take Constitutional Law as an option in the Final Honour School and these students will in general cover seven topics in tutorials. The examination papers for both Law Moderations and the Final Honour School will consist of ten essay questions.
The precise pattern of tutorial teaching varies from college to college but the faculty expects that tutors will include the items listed in bold type in the Teaching Convention. Lectures are given in Michaelmas and Hilary Terms on most aspects of the course. Please see the core reading list for more detailed guidance as to the depth of knowledge required of the topics listed in the Teaching Convention.
[less]
FHS (Phase II)
The degree is awarded on the basis of nine final examinations at the end of the three-year course (or four years in the case of Law with Law Studies in Europe) and (for students who began the course in October 2011 or later) an essay in Jurisprudence written over the summer vacation at the end of the second year. Note: the Jurisprudence exam at the end of the third year is correspondingly shorter. This phase of the Final Honour School includes the third term of the first year, and all three terms of the second year.
[less]
Administrative Law is concerned primarily with judicial control of the activities of the executive branch of government. The main topics covered are: (1) the grounds on which decisions and rules made by the executive can be challenged in the court - some of these relate to the substance of the decision or rule and others to the procedure by which it was made; (2) the remedies which can be obtained by applicants challenging administrative decisions; (3) the liability of public authorities in contract and tort.Some tutors also deal with tribunals, public local inquiries, next steps agencies, contracting out and public sector ombudsmen. Some of these topics are the subject of lectures, which also occasionally deal with more theoretical aspects of the subject. Administrative Law is now one of the compulsory standard subjects within the Final Honours School syllabus. It also covers material in the “foundations of legal knowledge” and so must be taken by those seeking a professional qualification in England and Wales. The subject is taught in tutorials arranged by your college tutor.
[less]
FHS - Final Year (Phase III)
The degree is awarded on the basis of nine final examinations at the end of the three-year course (or four years in the case of Law with Law Studies in Europe) and (for students who began the course in October 2011 or later) an essay in Jurisprudence written over the summer vacation at the end of the second year. Note: the Jurisprudence exam at the end of the third year is correspondingly shorter. This phase of the Final Honour School includes the first and second term of the final year; the Final Examinations are taken in the third term of the final year.
[less]
Constitutional Law (Senior Status only)
This course covers the law of the constitution, including the structure and basic principles of the British constitution, and the impact of European Community law on the constitution. It also provides an introduction to the protection of human rights in English law.
Constitutional Law covers material in the “foundations of legal knowledge” and so must be taken by those seeking a profession qualification in England and Wales.Students taking the BA in Jurisprudence (Course 1 and Course 2) take Constitutional Law as one of the three papers for Law Moderations and will in general cover eight topics in tutorials. Students taking the BA in Jurisprudence with Senior Status may choose to take Constitutional Law as an option in the Final Honour School and these students will in general cover seven topics in tutorials. The examination papers for both Law Moderations and the Final Honour School will consist of ten essay questions.
The precise pattern of tutorial teaching varies from college to college but the faculty expects that tutors will include the items listed in bold type in the Teaching Convention. Lectures are given in Michaelmas and Hilary Terms on most aspects of the course. Please see the core reading list for more detailed guidance as to the depth of knowledge required of the topics listed in the Teaching Convention.
[less]
Diploma in Legal Studies
A one-year sample of courses from our BA programmes, aimed only at students visiting from our partner universities.
[less]
Administrative Law is concerned primarily with judicial control of the activities of the executive branch of government. The main topics covered are: (1) the grounds on which decisions and rules made by the executive can be challenged in the court - some of these relate to the substance of the decision or rule and others to the procedure by which it was made; (2) the remedies which can be obtained by applicants challenging administrative decisions; (3) the liability of public authorities in contract and tort.Some tutors also deal with tribunals, public local inquiries, next steps agencies, contracting out and public sector ombudsmen. Some of these topics are the subject of lectures, which also occasionally deal with more theoretical aspects of the subject. Administrative Law is now one of the compulsory standard subjects within the Final Honours School syllabus. It also covers material in the “foundations of legal knowledge” and so must be taken by those seeking a professional qualification in England and Wales. The subject is taught in tutorials arranged by your college tutor.
[less]
Constitutional Law (Senior Status only)
This course covers the law of the constitution, including the structure and basic principles of the British constitution, and the impact of European Community law on the constitution. It also provides an introduction to the protection of human rights in English law.
Constitutional Law covers material in the “foundations of legal knowledge” and so must be taken by those seeking a profession qualification in England and Wales.Students taking the BA in Jurisprudence (Course 1 and Course 2) take Constitutional Law as one of the three papers for Law Moderations and will in general cover eight topics in tutorials. Students taking the BA in Jurisprudence with Senior Status may choose to take Constitutional Law as an option in the Final Honour School and these students will in general cover seven topics in tutorials. The examination papers for both Law Moderations and the Final Honour School will consist of ten essay questions.
The precise pattern of tutorial teaching varies from college to college but the faculty expects that tutors will include the items listed in bold type in the Teaching Convention. Lectures are given in Michaelmas and Hilary Terms on most aspects of the course. Please see the core reading list for more detailed guidance as to the depth of knowledge required of the topics listed in the Teaching Convention.
[less]
Postgraduate
MJur
Our taught postgraduate programme, designed to serve outstanding law students from civil law backgrounds.
[less]
Administrative Law (also part of the BA course)
Administrative Law is concerned primarily with judicial control of the activities of the executive branch of government. The main topics covered are: (1) the grounds on which decisions and rules made by the executive can be challenged in the court - some of these relate to the substance of the decision or rule and others to the procedure by which it was made; (2) the remedies which can be obtained by applicants challenging administrative decisions; (3) the liability of public authorities in contract and tort.Some tutors also deal with tribunals, public local inquiries, next steps agencies, contracting out and public sector ombudsmen. Some of these topics are the subject of lectures, which also occasionally deal with more theoretical aspects of the subject. Administrative Law is now one of the compulsory standard subjects within the Final Honours School syllabus. It also covers material in the “foundations of legal knowledge” and so must be taken by those seeking a professional qualification in England and Wales. The subject is taught in tutorials arranged by your college tutor.
[less]
This course covers the law of the constitution, including the structure and basic principles of the British constitution, and the impact of European Community law on the constitution. It also provides an introduction to the protection of human rights in English law.
Constitutional Law covers material in the “foundations of legal knowledge” and so must be taken by those seeking a profession qualification in England and Wales.Students taking the BA in Jurisprudence (Course 1 and Course 2) take Constitutional Law as one of the three papers for Law Moderations and will in general cover eight topics in tutorials. Students taking the BA in Jurisprudence with Senior Status may choose to take Constitutional Law as an option in the Final Honour School and these students will in general cover seven topics in tutorials. The examination papers for both Law Moderations and the Final Honour School will consist of ten essay questions.
The precise pattern of tutorial teaching varies from college to college but the faculty expects that tutors will include the items listed in bold type in the Teaching Convention. Lectures are given in Michaelmas and Hilary Terms on most aspects of the course. Please see the core reading list for more detailed guidance as to the depth of knowledge required of the topics listed in the Teaching Convention.
[less]
People
Constitutional and Administrative Law teaching is organized by a Subject Group convened by:
Aileen Kavanagh: Reader in Law
in conjunction with:
Roderick Bagshaw: CUF Lecturer
Nicholas Bamforth: CUF Lecturer
Nicholas Barber: CUF Lecturer
Cathryn Costello: Fellow and Tutor in EU and Public Law
Paul Cowie: Stipendiary Lecturer in Law at St Hilda's College
Paul Craig: Professor of English Law
Anne Davies: Professor of Law and Public Policy
Sionaidh Douglas-Scott: Professor of European and Human Rights Law
Richard Ekins: CUF Lecturer
Pavlos Eleftheriadis: University Lecturer in Law
Timothy Endicott: Dean of the Faculty and Professor of Legal Philosophy
John Finnis: Professor
Liz Fisher: Reader in Environmental Law
Denis Galligan: Professor of Socio-Legal Studies
Hayley Hooper: DPhil Law
Tarunabh Khaitan: CUF Lecturer
Liora Lazarus: CUF Lecturer
Jeremias Prassl: Supernumerary Teaching Fellow in Law
Arghya Sengupta: Stipendiary Lecturer in Administrative Law
Rachel Taylor: Lecturer
Seshauna Wheatle: Stipendiary Lecturer in Law at Exeter College
Rebecca Williams: CUF Lecturer
Alison L Young: CUF Lecturer
assisted by:
Joel Harrison: DPhil Law student
Also working in this field, but not involved in its teaching programme:
David Erdos: Katzenbach Research Fellow & Leverhulme Trust Early Career Fellow
Sandra Fredman: Rhodes Professor of the Laws of the British Commonwealth and the United States
Paolo Ronchi: DPhil Law student
Edwin Simpson: CUF Lecturer
