Law of Obligations — Overview
This theme contains three subjects, namely: Contract, Restitution and Tort
Contract
Discussion Groups
These self-sustaining groups are an essential part of the life of our graduate school. They are organised in some cases by graduate students and in others by Faculty members and meet regularly during term, typically over a sandwich lunch, when one of the group presents work in progress or introduces a discussion of a particular issue or new case. They may also encompass guest speakers from the faculty and beyond.
Publications
Showing selected publications sorted by type, then year, author, title [change this]
Showing key publications in this field, as selected by the author
Change to sort them by year | title | name OR
Show All 101 | Recent publications
Journal Articles
2012
T Krebs, 'Yearworth and the Law of Contract' (2012) Journal of Medical Ethics Special Issue - Human Body Parts/Property
Simon Whittaker, 'The Proposed \'Common European Sales Law\': Legal Framework and the Agreement of the Parties' (2012) 75 Modern Law Review 578 [...]
The European Commission’s Proposal for a Regulation on a Common European Sales Law (‘CESL’) seeks to create a European scheme of contract law available for parties to choose to govern cross-border contracts for the sale of goods, supply of ‘digital content,’ and for the supply of related services.This article explains the background to the Proposal, sketches out the purposes and scope of the CESL, and considers and criticises its legal framework (and in particular its relationship with private international law) and the key requirement of the parties’ agreement. In the author’s view, the CESL scheme remains an unconvincing basis for the achievement of its economic purposes and, as regards consumer contracts, puts too much reliance on the agreement of the consumer as a justification for the loss of their existing protection under EU private international law rules.
2011
M Chen-Wishart, 'The Purposes and Methods of English Contract Law' (2011) 12 Peking University Law Review 681
2009
J Cartwright, 'The English Law of Contract: Time for Review?' (2009) 17 European Review of Private Law 155 [...]
Discussion of aspects of the English law of contract which are in need of reform, and the mechanisms by which reform can be achieved. Revised text of Inaugural Lecture delivered on 7 October 2008 in acceptance of the Chair of Anglo-American Private Law at the University of Leiden.
ISBN: 0928-9801
2008
J Vella, 'Sham Transactions' [2008] LMCLQ 488
Books
2012
M Chen-Wishart, Contract Law (4th ed, Oxford University Press 2012)
W E Peel, Halsburys Laws of England (Vol 22 (Contract), LexisNexis 2012) [...]
A treatise on the law of contract; in particular: (i) Introduction, (ii) Form & Formalities; (iii) Formation, (iv) Consideration & Privity, (v) Contractual Terms, (vi) Illegality, (vii) Frustration, (viii) Discharge of Contractual Promises, (ix) Joint and Several Promises
ISBN: 9781405763592
2011
W E Peel, Treitel: The Law of Contract, 13th ed. (Sweet & Maxwell 2011)
Chapters
2011
W E Peel, 'The Common Law Tradition: Regulation of Boilerplate Clauses in English Law' in G. Cordero-Moss (ed), Boilerplate Clauses, International Commercial Contracts and the Applicable Law (CUP 2011)
2010
J Cartwright, 'Liability in Tort for Pre-Contractual Non-Disclosure' in A Burrows and E Peel (eds), Contract Formation and Parties (OUP 2010) [...]
Discussion and criticism of recent cases holdinbg that a fraudulent breach of a duty of disclosure is actionable within the tort of deceit.
ISBN: 9780199583706
M Chen-Wishart, 'A Bird in the Hand: Consideration and One-Sided Contract Modifications' in AS Burrows, E Peel (eds), Contract Formation and Parties (Oxford University Press 2010) [...]
If we accept that a bird in the hand is the worth two in the bush then the idea that the receipt of performance (even part performance) confers a benefit over and above the right to performance, and can be exchanged for something from the recipient, is consistent with the core idea of the consideration doctrine. All that remains is to replace the bilateral contract analysis in Williams v Roffey with a unilateral contract analysis (the promisor is only bound if the stipulated performance is actually received). This is preferable to three recently mooted alternatives to consideration as the primary test of enforceability: (i) the test of serious intention subject to contrary policies advanced in Antons Trawling v Smith; (ii) the version of promissory estoppel advanced in Collier v Wright, and (iii) leaving it all to the vitiating factors advocated in Gay Choon Ing v Loh Sze Ti Terence Peter.
ISBN: 9780199583706
W E Peel, 'Agreements to Negotiate in Good Faith' in Andrew Burrows and Edwin Peel (eds), Contract Formation and Parties (OUP 2010) [...]
An essay concerning the limits to the enforceability of agreements to negotiate and a proposal for reform
ISBN: 978-0-19-958370-6
2009
M Chen-Wishart, 'Objectivity and Mistake: the Oxymoron of Smith v Hughes' in J Neyers, R Bronough, SGA Pitel (eds), Exploring Contract Law (Hart 2009) [...]
The author explores the contours of the ?objective test of intentions? and concludes that Smith v Hughes and other ?mistake of terms? cases said to represent exceptional subjectivity trumping the objective approach are straightforward applications of objectivity; there is no need, indeed no room, for resort to subjectivity. Further, stabilizing the language of ?mistake,? ?defective consent,? and ?void? allows vital distinctions to be drawn between contract formation and vitiation which explains why known non-correspondence of any term prevents contract formation, while mistaken assumptions must be shared and fundamental to void a contract. It also allows us to map the related areas of rectification, non est factum, mistaken identity and misrepresentation.
ISBN: 9781841139067
2008
D P Nolan, 'Hongkong Fir Shipping Co v Kawasaki Kisen Kaisha Ltd, The Hongkong Fir (1961)' in Charles Mitchell and Paul Mitchell (eds), Landmark Cases in the Law of Contract (Hart Publishing 2008)
Edited books
2010
W E Peel and Andrew Burrows (eds), Contract Formation and Parties (OUP 2010) [...]
A collection of essays on the 'formation process' and 'third parties' based on the papers presented at the Oxford-Norton Rose Law Colloquium, September 2009
ISBN: 978-0-19-958370-6
Courses
The courses we offer in this field are:
Undergraduate
FHS (Phase II)
The degree is awarded on the basis of nine final examinations at the end of the three-year course (or four years in the case of Law with Law Studies in Europe) and (for students who began the course in October 2011 or later) an essay in Jurisprudence written over the summer vacation at the end of the second year. Note: the Jurisprudence exam at the end of the third year is correspondingly shorter. This phase of the Final Honour School includes the third term of the first year, and all three terms of the second year.
[less]
The syllabus comprises the general principles of the law governing enforceable agreements. It is not concerned with special rules governing specific types of contracts, such as sale, carriage or employment. The principal topics normally discussed are: (a) the rules relating to the formation of agreements and to certain further requirements which must be satisfied to make agreements legally enforceable; (b) the contents of a contract and the rules governing the validity of terms which exclude or restrict liability; (c) the nature and effects in a contractual context of mistake, misrepresentation, duress and undue influence; (d) the general principle that right and duties arising under a contract can only be enforced by and against the parties to it; (e) performance and breach, including the right to terminate for failure in performance and the effects of wrongful repudiation; (f) supervening events as a ground of discharge under the doctrine of frustration; (g) remedies for breach of contract by way of damages, action for the agreed sum, specific performance and injunction. (h) the basis of contractual liability.
Contract is one of the compulsory standard subjects within the Final Honour School syllabus. It also covers material in the “foundations of legal knowledge” and so must be taken by those seeking a professional qualification in England and Wales.
The subject is taught in tutorials arranged by your college tutor. Particular areas are also explored in lectures.
[less]
Diploma in Legal Studies
A one-year sample of courses from our BA programmes, aimed only at students visiting from our partner universities.
[less]
The syllabus comprises the general principles of the law governing enforceable agreements. It is not concerned with special rules governing specific types of contracts, such as sale, carriage or employment. The principal topics normally discussed are: (a) the rules relating to the formation of agreements and to certain further requirements which must be satisfied to make agreements legally enforceable; (b) the contents of a contract and the rules governing the validity of terms which exclude or restrict liability; (c) the nature and effects in a contractual context of mistake, misrepresentation, duress and undue influence; (d) the general principle that right and duties arising under a contract can only be enforced by and against the parties to it; (e) performance and breach, including the right to terminate for failure in performance and the effects of wrongful repudiation; (f) supervening events as a ground of discharge under the doctrine of frustration; (g) remedies for breach of contract by way of damages, action for the agreed sum, specific performance and injunction. (h) the basis of contractual liability.
Contract is one of the compulsory standard subjects within the Final Honour School syllabus. It also covers material in the “foundations of legal knowledge” and so must be taken by those seeking a professional qualification in England and Wales.
The subject is taught in tutorials arranged by your college tutor. Particular areas are also explored in lectures.
[less]
Postgraduate
MJur
Our taught postgraduate programme, designed to serve outstanding law students from civil law backgrounds.
[less]
Contract (also part of the BA course)
The syllabus comprises the general principles of the law governing enforceable agreements. It is not concerned with special rules governing specific types of contracts, such as sale, carriage or employment. The principal topics normally discussed are: (a) the rules relating to the formation of agreements and to certain further requirements which must be satisfied to make agreements legally enforceable; (b) the contents of a contract and the rules governing the validity of terms which exclude or restrict liability; (c) the nature and effects in a contractual context of mistake, misrepresentation, duress and undue influence; (d) the general principle that right and duties arising under a contract can only be enforced by and against the parties to it; (e) performance and breach, including the right to terminate for failure in performance and the effects of wrongful repudiation; (f) supervening events as a ground of discharge under the doctrine of frustration; (g) remedies for breach of contract by way of damages, action for the agreed sum, specific performance and injunction. (h) the basis of contractual liability.
Contract is one of the compulsory standard subjects within the Final Honour School syllabus. It also covers material in the “foundations of legal knowledge” and so must be taken by those seeking a professional qualification in England and Wales.
The subject is taught in tutorials arranged by your college tutor. Particular areas are also explored in lectures.
[less]
People
Contract teaching is organized by a Subject Group convened by:
Mindy Chen-Wishart: Reader in Contract Law
in conjunction with:
Dapo Akande: University Lecturer in Public International Law
Alexandra Braun: CUF Lecturer
Adrian Briggs: Professor of Private International Law
Susan Bright: Professor of Land Law, McGregor Fellow
Andrew Burrows, QC: Professor of the Law of England
John Cartwright: Professor of the Law of Contract
Andrew Dyson: College Lecturer and Tutor in Law
Joshua Getzler: Professor of Law and Legal History
Katharine Grevling: CUF Lecturer
Louise Gullifer: Professor of Commercial Law
Jonathan Herring: Professor of Law
Andrew Higgins: Lecturer in Civil Procedure
Thomas Krebs: University Lecturer in Commercial Law
Ewan McKendrick: Registrar
Peter Mirfield: CUF Lecturer
Donal Nolan: CUF Lecturer
Edwin Peel: Professor of Law
Jeremias Prassl: Supernumerary Teaching Fellow in Law
Simon Whittaker: Professor of European Comparative Law
assisted by:
Carmine Conte: DPhil Law student
Jesse Wall: DPhil Law student
Also working in this field, but not involved in its teaching programme:
Tatiana Cutts: DPhil Law student
Jodi Gardner: MPhil Law student
Donald Harris: Retired. Formerly Director of the Centre for Socio-Legal Studies at Balliol
Geneviève Helleringer: Leverhulme Trust Early Career Fellow
Dori Kimel: Reader in Legal Philosophy
Andelka Phillips: DPhil Law student
Dan Prentice: Emeritus Professor of Corporate Law
Francis Reynolds: Emeritus Professor of Law at Worcester College
Jan Peter Schmidt: Max Planck Fellow
Guenter Treitel: Emeritus Vinerian Professor of English Law at All Souls
Rafal Zakrzewski: Career Development Fellow
[top]
Restitution
Publications
Showing selected publications sorted by type, then year, author, title [change this]
Showing key publications in this field, as selected by the author
Change to sort them by year | title | name OR
Show All 25 | Recent publications
Books
2010
R Williams, Unjust Enrichment and Public Law: A comparative study of England, France and the EU (Hart Publishing 2010) [...]
Since the decisions in R v IRC ex p Woolwich Equitable Building Society in 1990 and Hazell v Hammersmith and Fulham LBC in 1991, the courts have had, in a variety of contexts, to grapple with the relationship between unjust enrichment, public law and the law of the European Community. 20 years later, the decision of the European Court of Justice in Metallgesellschaft and Hoecsht v IRC in 2001 has led to a further explosion of such cases, many of which are still making their way through the courts. The central aim of this book is to examine such claims in France, England and the EC. The author argues that so far these cases have been viewed from either a public or private law perspective, whereas in fact both branches of the law are relevant, and the courts ought not to lose sight of the public law issues when a claim is brought under the private law of unjust enrichment. Support for this position is drawn from an examination of French law, which demonstrates that neither adoption of the ‘without cause’ approach to unjust enrichment, nor the longer-standing existence of a separate concept of public law removes the necessity for such a hybrid public and private understanding of the cases. Finally, in order to complete the picture the book examines cases where the limit on the public body’s powers derives, not from domestic public law, but from the law of the EC. Thus a further aspect of the book is that it analyses more specifically what is often referred to as the ECJ’s ‘remedies’ jurisprudence in order to investigate the division of labour between the European courts and the domestic courts in defining such claims.
ISBN: 1841134147 / 9781841
Chapters
2012
R Williams, 'A Hybrid Public and Private Approach' in Birke Haecker, Charles Mitchell, Steven Elliott (eds), Restitution of Overpaid Taxes ( 2012) (forthcoming) [...]
Continues the argument developed in 'Unjust Enrichment and Public law' in the light of the decision of the Supreme Court in FII. Argues that in Deutsche Morgan Grenfell the House of Lords took a wrong turning on the law of unjust enrichment in a public law context, a decision which has led to unnecessary and avoidable litigation, as evidenced by FII. Suggests that such litigation could in future be avoided by reversing the Deutsche Morgan Grenfell decision and adopting the hybrid public and private approach to cases of unjust enrichment involving public bodies.
Courses
The courses we offer in this field are:
Postgraduate
BCL
Our taught postgraduate programme, designed to serve outstanding law students from common-law backgrounds
[less]
Restitution of Unjust Enrichment
Restitution of Unjust Enrichment is concerned with about how and when a claimant can compel a defendant to surrender an enrichment gained at the claimant’s expense. Long neglected, the subject has in recent years been one of the most exciting in the postgraduate curriculum. It draws its cases from areas of the law which have resisted rational analysis, largely because they have tenaciously preserved the language of an earlier age.
Common lawyers found themselves unable to escape from money had and received, money paid, and quantum meruit, while those on the chancery side became defensively fond of the unsolved mysteries of tracing and trusts arising by operation of law. In the result, down to earth questions about getting back money and value in other forms have been made to seem much more difficult than they need be. The aim of any course on restitution must be to try to understand what has really been going on and to play back that understanding to the courts in accessible modern language. These aims are helped by keeping an eye on the main lines of civilian solutions to the problems with which the common law has to wrestle.
Note that this course is concerned only with restitution of unjust enrichment. Restitution for wrongs is not part of the course and is dealt with in the Commercial remedies course.
Teaching is through twelve seminars. The seminars are supported by two introductory lectures and by the provision of four tutorials. A detailed account of the course is produced every year in and posted on this site. The subject of every seminar is set out, with a list of cases and other materials to be read, together with questions and problems intended to stimulate thought.
[less]
MJur
Our taught postgraduate programme, designed to serve outstanding law students from civil law backgrounds.
[less]
Restitution of Unjust Enrichment
Restitution of Unjust Enrichment is concerned with about how and when a claimant can compel a defendant to surrender an enrichment gained at the claimant’s expense. Long neglected, the subject has in recent years been one of the most exciting in the postgraduate curriculum. It draws its cases from areas of the law which have resisted rational analysis, largely because they have tenaciously preserved the language of an earlier age.
Common lawyers found themselves unable to escape from money had and received, money paid, and quantum meruit, while those on the chancery side became defensively fond of the unsolved mysteries of tracing and trusts arising by operation of law. In the result, down to earth questions about getting back money and value in other forms have been made to seem much more difficult than they need be. The aim of any course on restitution must be to try to understand what has really been going on and to play back that understanding to the courts in accessible modern language. These aims are helped by keeping an eye on the main lines of civilian solutions to the problems with which the common law has to wrestle.
Note that this course is concerned only with restitution of unjust enrichment. Restitution for wrongs is not part of the course and is dealt with in the Commercial remedies course.
Teaching is through twelve seminars. The seminars are supported by two introductory lectures and by the provision of four tutorials. A detailed account of the course is produced every year in and posted on this site. The subject of every seminar is set out, with a list of cases and other materials to be read, together with questions and problems intended to stimulate thought.
[less]
People
Restitution teaching is organized by a Subject Group convened by:
William Swadling: Reader in Property Law
in conjunction with:
Andrew Burrows, QC: Professor of the Law of England
Mindy Chen-Wishart: Reader in Contract Law
Ewan McKendrick: Registrar
Edwin Peel: Professor of Law
Robert Stevens: Herbert Smith Freehills Professor of English Private Law
Simon Whittaker: Professor of European Comparative Law
Also working in this field, but not involved in its teaching programme:
Tatiana Cutts: DPhil Law student
Derek Davies: Retired. Formerly Fellow and Tutor in Law at St Catherine's
Jodi Gardner: MPhil Law student
[top]
Tort
News
Professor Jane Stapleton wins the William L. Prosser Award
Professor Jane Stapleton has been awarded the prestigious William L. Prosser Award by the Association of American Law Schools [more…]
Publications
Showing selected publications sorted by type, then year, author, title [change this]
Showing key publications in this field, as selected by the author
Change to sort them by year | title | name OR
Show All 78 | Recent publications
Journal Articles
2013
D P Nolan, 'Negligence and Human Rights: The Case for Separate Development' (2013) 76 Modern Law Review 286
2011
D P Nolan, 'The Liability of Public Authorities for Failing to Confer Benefits' (2011) 127 Law Quarterly Review 260
Books
2012
N J McBride and R M Bagshaw, Tort Law (Fourth edition) (Pearson 2012) (forthcoming) [...]
Fourth edition of this textbook
ISBN: 9781408252703
2010
Laura Hoyano and C Keenan, Child Abuse: Law and Policy Across Boundaries (OUP 2010) [...]
This book examines the whole process of child protection from complaint investigation to prosecution in the criminal and civil courts. It provides a coherent analysis of current law and procedure across the legal and geographical boundaries within which legal discussion of child abuse is usually confined, analysing criminal, family, tort, human rights and evidence law as they bear on child abuse cases. Comparative material is drawn from over 75 jurisdictionsusing the adversarial trial model. The book was awarded the first Inner Temple Book Prize (2008). The paperback edition is updated in English law, including the Coroners and Justice Act 2009 enacted on 12 November 2009.
ISBN: 978-0-19-957156-7
Chapters
2012
D P Nolan, 'The Fatal Accidents Act 1846' in TT Arvind and J Steele (eds), Tort Law and the Legislature: Common Law, Statute and the Dynamics of Legal Change ( 2012)
D P Nolan, '\\\"A Tort Against Land\\\": Private Nuisance as a Property Tort' in D Nolan and A Robertson (eds), Rights and Private Law (Hart Publishing 2012)
2011
R M Bagshaw, 'Causing the Behaviour of Others and Other Causal Mixtures' in Richard Goldberg (ed), Perspectives on Causation (Hart Publishing 2011) [...]
This chapter investigates the concept of ‘cause’ which ought to be used by tort lawyers when making claims such as that Derek’s wrongful behaviour ‘caused’ Trevor to act in some way, in particular in circumstances where we regard Trevor’s action as ‘voluntary’ rather than ‘coerced’. The central issue is whether a tort lawyer’s inquiry into whether Derek’s wrongful behaviour ‘caused’ Trevor to act in some way ought to be the same as an inquiry into whether Derek’s wrongful behaviour ‘caused’ the kettle to boil or the toaster to burn the toast.
ISBN: 9781849460866
R M Bagshaw, 'The Edges of Tort Law’s Rights' in D Nolan and A Robertson (eds), Rights and Private Law (Hart Publishing 2011) [...]
Most proponents of a ‘rights-focused account’ of the law of torts argue that not only are there currently no general common law rights to pure economic benefits but there are also good reasons why general common law rights to purely economic benefits should not exist whilst general common law rights to property do, or good reasons why legislators or judges should not in future create or recognise general common law rights to purely economic benefits. The main purpose of this chapter is to evaluate these ‘good reasons’ using three perspectives provided by the ‘edges’ of currently recognised legal rights.
ISBN: 9781849461429
R M Bagshaw, 'Tort Design and Human Rights Thinking' in David Hoffman (ed), The Impact of the UK Human Rights Act on Private Law (Cambridge University Press 2011) [...]
The principal theme of this chapter is that in pursuing the goal of making English tort law compatible with Convention rights, and the related goal of developing tort law so as to allow it to assist in protecting these rights, we should not lose sight of what makes a good tort duty. Lord Bingham commended the opinion that ‘where a common law duty covers the same ground as a Convention right, it should, so far as practicable, develop in harmony with it’ (Van Colle v. Chief Constable of the Hertfordshire Police; Smith v. Chief Constable of Sussex Police [2008] UKHL 50; [2009] 1 AC 225 at [58]). But this chapter aims to unsettle any assumption that such harmony requires the development of tort duties which mirror Convention rights, even in situations where the tort duties will be owed by public bodies. It is more important for newly developed duties to be harmonious with the goals of the law of torts than for them to replicate concepts used by the Strasbourg Court.
ISBN: 9781107009325
S Green, 'Rights and Wrongs: An Introduction to the Wrongful Interference Actions' in Donal Nolan and Andrew Robertson (eds), Rights and Private Law (Hart Publishing 2011)
D P Nolan, 'Nuisance' in D Hoffman (ed), The Impact of the UK Human Rights Act on Private Law (CUP 2011)
2010
D P Nolan, 'Alcock v Chief Constable of South Yorkshire Police (1991)' in Charles Mitchell and Paul Mitchell (eds), Landmark Cases in the Law of Tort (Hart Publishing 2010)
2009
R M Bagshaw, 'Tort Law, Concepts and What Really Matters' in Andrew Robertson and Tang Hang Wu (eds), The Goals of Private Law (Hart Publishing 2009) [...]
This chapter explores the relationship between the capacity of tort law to achieve its goals and the nature of the concepts that are incorporated in the law.
ISBN: 9781841139098
Courses
The courses we offer in this field are:
Undergraduate
FHS (Phase II)
The degree is awarded on the basis of nine final examinations at the end of the three-year course (or four years in the case of Law with Law Studies in Europe) and (for students who began the course in October 2011 or later) an essay in Jurisprudence written over the summer vacation at the end of the second year. Note: the Jurisprudence exam at the end of the third year is correspondingly shorter. This phase of the Final Honour School includes the third term of the first year, and all three terms of the second year.
[less]
Tort is one of the compulsory standard subjects within the Final Honour School syllabus. It also covers material in the “foundations of legal knowledge” and so must be taken by those seeking a professional qualification in England and Wales. The law of tort is mainly concerned with providing compensation for personal injury and damage to property, but also protects other interests, such as reputation, personal freedom, title to property, enjoyment of property, and commercial interests.The subject is taught in tutorials arranged by your college tutor. Lectures in Michaelmas and Trinity terms cover most, but not all, of the topics on the agreed reading list. Revision lectures on contract and tort take place in Hilary term.
[less]
Diploma in Legal Studies
A one-year sample of courses from our BA programmes, aimed only at students visiting from our partner universities.
[less]
Tort is one of the compulsory standard subjects within the Final Honour School syllabus. It also covers material in the “foundations of legal knowledge” and so must be taken by those seeking a professional qualification in England and Wales. The law of tort is mainly concerned with providing compensation for personal injury and damage to property, but also protects other interests, such as reputation, personal freedom, title to property, enjoyment of property, and commercial interests.The subject is taught in tutorials arranged by your college tutor. Lectures in Michaelmas and Trinity terms cover most, but not all, of the topics on the agreed reading list. Revision lectures on contract and tort take place in Hilary term.
[less]
Postgraduate
MJur
Our taught postgraduate programme, designed to serve outstanding law students from civil law backgrounds.
[less]
Tort (also part of the BA course)
Tort is one of the compulsory standard subjects within the Final Honour School syllabus. It also covers material in the “foundations of legal knowledge” and so must be taken by those seeking a professional qualification in England and Wales. The law of tort is mainly concerned with providing compensation for personal injury and damage to property, but also protects other interests, such as reputation, personal freedom, title to property, enjoyment of property, and commercial interests.The subject is taught in tutorials arranged by your college tutor. Lectures in Michaelmas and Trinity terms cover most, but not all, of the topics on the agreed reading list. Revision lectures on contract and tort take place in Hilary term.
[less]
People
Tort teaching is organized by a Subject Group convened by:
James Goudkamp: University Lecturer (CUF)
in conjunction with:
Roderick Bagshaw: CUF Lecturer
Andrew Burrows, QC: Professor of the Law of England
John Cartwright: Professor of the Law of Contract
Andrew Dyson: College Lecturer and Tutor in Law
Lucinda Ferguson: University Lecturer in Family Law
Rob George: British Academy Postdoctoral Fellow
Imogen Goold: CUF Lecturer
Noam Gur: Shaw Foundation Fellow in Law, Lincoln College
Andrew Higgins: Lecturer in Civil Procedure
Laura Hoyano: Hackney Fellow & Tutor in Law and CUF Lecturer
Thomas Krebs: University Lecturer in Commercial Law
Dorota Leczykiewicz: Leverhulme Trust Early Career Fellow
Mike Macnair: CUF Lecturer
Donal Nolan: CUF Lecturer
Edwin Peel: Professor of Law
Denise Réaume: Visiting Professor
Roger Smith: CUF Lecturer
Rachel Taylor: Lecturer
Simon Whittaker: Professor of European Comparative Law
Also working in this field, but not involved in its teaching programme:
Paul Craig: Professor of English Law
John Davies: Retired. Formerly Fellow and Tutor in Law at Brasenose
Eric Descheemaeker: Research Fellow, Institute of European and Comparative Law
Simon Douglas: CUF Lecturer
Jodi Gardner: MPhil Law student
Sarah Green: CUF Lecturer
Donald Harris: Retired. Formerly Director of the Centre for Socio-Legal Studies at Balliol
Angus Johnston: CUF Lecturer
Martin Matthews: Retired. Formerly CUF Lecturer
Peter North: Retired. Formerly Principal of Jesus
Gosia Pearson: Policy Officer, DG Humanitarian Aid and Civil Protection of the European Commission
[top]
