Secretary Clinton honours human rights champion Eleanor Roosevelt at the Bonavero Institute​

To mark the 70th anniversary of the Universal Declaration of Human Rights (UDHR), the Bonavero Institute of Human Rights holds a two-day event at Mansfield College. Watch the keynote speech here.

The Bonavero Institute of Human Rights is a dedicated institute within the Faculty of Law at the University of Oxford. Since October 2017, the Institute has been housed in a new building at Mansfield College. Here it will undertake worldclass research in the field of human rights law and foster public engagement in human rights issues beyond the academy.

As part of its mission, the Institute seeks to integrate human rights research and practice within the Law Faculty and the University more broadly. It will establish a vibrant community of graduate students, host outstanding scholars of law and other disciplines, and collaborate with practitioners engaged in the most pressing contemporary human rights issues around the world. 

The Bonavero Institute Strategic Plan

Keeping up with the Bonavero

Photos of us Our videos

The Bonavero in Brief

  • We invite scholars from the UK and overseas to become Research Visitors based at the Institute for a term or longer
  • We connect with existing Oxford academics within the Faculty of Law and other departments by appointing them to be our Academic Affiliates
  • We provide a combined and comfortable workspace where academics, students, and visiting practitioners can work alongside one another
  • We award funding for our students to undertake internships in human rights organisations globally.
  • We collaborate with other Oxford institutions to host a programme of high-profile events

Find out more...


  • HJ Hooper and Veronika Fikfak, Parliament's Secret War (Hart: Bloomsbury 2018)
    The invasion of Iraq in 2003, and the Coalition Government's failure to win parliamentary approval for armed intervention in Syria in 2013, mark a period of increased scrutiny of the process by which the UK engages in armed conflict. For much of the media and civil society there now exists a constitutional convention which mandates that the Government consults Parliament before commencing hostilities. This is celebrated as representing a redistribution of power from the executive towards a more legitimate, democratic institution. This book offers a critical inquiry into Parliament's role in the war prerogative since the beginning of the twentieth century, evaluating whether the UK's decisions to engage in conflict meet the recognised standards of good-governance: accountability, transparency and participation. The analysis reveals a number of persistent problems in the decision-making process, including Parliament's lack of access to relevant information, government 'legalisation' of parliamentary debates which frustrates broader discussions of political legitimacy, and the skewing of debates via the partial public disclosure of information based upon secret intelligence. The book offers solutions to these problems to reinvigorate parliamentary discourse and address government withholding of classified information. It is essential reading for anyone interested in war powers, the relationship between international law and domestic politics, and the role of the Westminster Parliament in questions of national security.
    ISBN: 9781509902873
  • S Theil, 'The German NetzDG: A Risk Worth Taking?' (2018) Verfassungsblog
    This contribution gives a succinct overview of the NetzDG and explain how some of the criticisms are overstated and partially misguided. While the NetzDG is unlikely to resolve all challenges surrounding social media and freedom of expression, and undoubtedly presents a certain risk of stifling expression online, I believe it is nonetheless a significant step in the right direction. Rather than undermine freedom of expression, it promises to contribute to more inclusive debates by giving the loud and radical voices less prominence.
  • Stoyanova, Human Trafficking and Slavery Reconsidered: Conceptual Limits and States’ Positive Obligations in European Law (Cambridge University Press 2017)