18th Annual Oxford IP Moot - participating Teams for 2021
Goethe University of Frankfurt 
Government Law College (India)
Gujarat National Law University 
Hidayatullah National Law University
ILS Law College
Jindal Global Law School 
King's College London 
NALSAR University of Law 
National Law Institute University, Bhopal 
National Law School of India University, Bangalore
National Law University, Delhi
National University of Advanced Legal Studies,  NUALS
Osgoode Hall Law School 
Queensland University of Technology 
SciencesPo Paris
Singapore Management University 
Swinburne University of Technology 
The City Law School 
The University of Law 
Tsinghua University 
University College London
University of Cambridge
University of Delhi 
University of Edinburgh
University of Hong Kong
University of New South Wales
University of Ottawa
University of Oxford 
University of Paris 2 Panthéon-Assas 
University of Technology Sydney 
University of Toronto 
West Bengal National University of Juridical Sciences
On 9 March 2020, the OIPRC made the difficult decision to cancel the oral rounds of the 18th annual Oxford IP Moot, scheduled to take place on 19-21 March 2020.

As noted in an announcement released in August 2020, the OIPRC decided that it would run a moot in March 2021 and that this moot would use the existing moot problem, Hotenhoffer Pharmaceuticals Erewhon and Hotenhoffer Lilliput v Republic of Erewhon [2019] HCE 46. It was also decided that teams competing in March 2021 would comprise teams invited to the March 2020 rounds and teams that made submissions in a written round in December 2020.

Invitations to December 2020 teams have been issued, and we are delighted to report that in 2021, we shall have a record-breaking 32 teams competing. Successful teams are listed above, and we have also updated the moot rules. Additional information will be added regularly to the moot website. In the meantime, the OIPCR would like to provide an update in relation to the format of the competition.

Given ongoing issues with the pandemic – including recent announcements from the UK government – our approach will be as follows:

  • The competition will be wholly online.
  • The Grand Final will take place on Saturday 20 March (the same date as had the moot been in-person). It will be livestreamed.
  • Rather than attempting to run the online competition in the usual compressed format (in which the moot is held over three days), we plan to run all the earlier rounds in the two weeks leading up to that date.
  • For the preliminary rounds, the draw will be constructed so that we avoid, as far as possible, teams having to moot in the middle of the night. That said, it will be necessary for some teams to moot outside of standard office hours of 9am to 5pm. For the later rounds, it may be more difficult to avoid some early starts and late finishes, as the draw at this point is based on ranking.
  • The schedule will be provided well in advance, so that teams can make the necessary arrangements for IT support, time away from study or work, etc. The schedule will be developed by the Moot Committee, in consultation with teams. Teams will not be asked to arrange their own moots.
  • Guidance will be given in relation to online advocacy, including in relation to the creation and use of bundles. A revised set of moot rules will be released.
  • There will be a discounted registration fee and no observer fees.

We know that many mooters will be disappointed that they cannot compete in Oxford. As such, we are considering ways to foster a sense of community among mooters and help them feel closer to Oxford. We also want to emphasise that although we would have loved to run an in-person competition, this will be an excellent opportunity for mooters to develop their skills at online advocacy – which we anticipate will be the way of the future for court proceedings.

The moot problem is available on this website. The new moot rules are available on this website.

If you have any questions about the above, please contact the Moot Secretary.

The 2021 moot concerns Hotenhoffer Pharmaceuticals Erewhon and Hotenhoffer Lilliput v Republic of Erewhon [2019] HCE 46. This year, the moot covers all three of the main IP regimes, with the appeal grounds relating to: (1) the issuing of a compulsory licence in relation to a pharmaceutical patent; (2) an application to cancel of a company's trade mark portfolio on the basis that the marks have become deceptive; and (3) whether the release of documents by the government – being a selection of documents supplied by a corporate whistleblower – is caught by the quotation exception or a general public interest defence to copyright infringement. The moot problem draws from topical matters in IP law, and covers important questions of policy and doctrine.

To keep apprised of announcements and news in relation to the moot (#OxIPMoot), please follow us on Twitter: @OxIPMoot or the Moot website
If you are a university or higher education institution interested in participating in the moot and receiving information about future IP Moots, please subscribe to our maillist by sending a blank email and subject line to ipmoot-subscribe@maillist.ox.ac.uk.  You will be sent a confirmation request and, once you reply to it, a message confirming that you are a subscriber.  Subscribers can unsubscribe at any time by sending a blank email to ipmoot-unsubscribe@maillist.ox.ac.uk.  
Academics and legal practitioners specialising in intellectual property who would like to volunteer their time to mark and/or judge the moot, can subscribe to our judges maillist by sending a blank email and subject line to ipmoot-judges-subscribe@maillist.ox.ac.uk.   We will inform you through the maillist when we are looking for markers/judges for next year's moot and beyond. You will be sent a confirmation request and, once you reply to it, a message confirming that you are a subscriber.  Subscribers can unsubscribe at any time by sending a blank email to ipmoot-judges-unsubscribe@maillist.ox.ac.uk