Blog

Lacrosse fire ruling sends shudders through building industry consultants and governments

By Geoff Hanmer

Do freeholders provide a unique and valuable service?

By Susan Bright

The Lacrosse Apartment Fire: Liability for Using Grenfell Style Cladding

By David Sawtell | Douglas Maxwell

Part 3: To enforce or not? Local authorities and cladding removal

By Susan Bright

A battle over words: is there ‘filler’ in ACM cladding?

By Andrew Chapman

Melbourne’s Neo200 apartment building fire: is the role of residents still being undervalued?

By Matthew Bell

A Human Right to Housing?

By Douglas Maxwell

Part 2: Building owners, local authorities and remediation: Some tentative thoughts

By Susan Bright

Part 1: Building owners and the cladding problem: Some basic land law

By Susan Bright

Stigma, More Than A Label

By Phil Murphy

Grenfell and the Need for a Tenants’ Voice

By John Boughton

'Class 0' and the End of Government’s Guidance on Building Regulations

By Jonathan Carrington

Local Authorities Have Teeth

By Susan Bright

Grenfell, the right to life, and the investigative duty

By Douglas Maxwell

Combustible cladding on student accommodation: a search for answers

By Andrew Chapman

Reaction to Grenfell and Combustible Cladding – a note from Australia

By Rebecca Leshinsky | Nicole Johnston

The Reality of Owning a Leasehold Flat Built by LendLease and Managed by Living City Post-Grenfell, Poor Choice.

By Thomas Bannan

What do Leaseholders think of Leasehold and Leasehold Management?

By Susan Bright

Cladding: combustibility, terminology and Building Regulations

By James Bessey

Why was unsafe cladding used on the Blackbird Leys towers?

By Roxana Willis

­Grenfell: Human Rights and a Ban on Combustible Cladding?

By Susan Bright