Horst Eidenmüller

Biography

Horst Eidenmüller joined the Faculty of Law as a Visiting Professor in 2009 and took up a Chair for Commercial Law and a Professorial Fellowship at St. Hugh’s College, Oxford, in 2015.

Eidenmüller was born in Munich, Germany. He obtained an LLM at Cambridge University (1989) and a PhD from Munich University (1994) after working for McKinsey & Co. in the 1990s. After his Habilitation in 1998, he was a law professor at the University of Münster from 1999 until 2003. From 2003 to 2014, he held the Chair for Private Law, German, European and International Company Law at Munich University. This position was designated as a research professorship under the excellence scheme of the German Research Foundation from 2007 to 2011.

Eidenmüller’s main research areas are contract law, company and bankruptcy law, and alternative dispute resolution. He is known for his economic and empirical analysis of important problems in these fields.

Eidenmüller has held visiting positions at major other universities such as Cambridge (2007), Harvard (2011), NYU (2013 and 2015), Stanford (2014) and Columbia (2018). From 2008 to 2009, he was a Fellow of the Institute for Advanced Study in Berlin. Eidenmüller is a Research Associate of the European Corporate Governance Institute (since 2009) and a Member of the Berlin-Brandenburg Academy of Sciences and Humanities (since 2008). As member of expert committees, he has advised the European Commission and the Federal Republic of Germany on issues of company and insolvency law reform. He has also acted as arbitrator in more than 40 commercial disputes (DIS, ICC, UNCITRAL, Ad Hoc) and as mediator in more than 60 commercial disputes since 1995.

In Oxford he lectures on Corporate Insolvency Law, on Comparative Corporate Law, and on Commercial Dispute Resolution (Commercial Negotiation and Mediation, International Commercial Arbitration).

Publications

Recent additions

J Dammann and H Eidenmüller, 'Codetermination and the Democratic State' (2022) University of Illinois Law Review (forthcoming)

DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.3680769
Two prominent progressive senators, Bernie Sanders and Elizabeth Warren, have recently proposed that employees should be allowed to elect 40 to 45 percent of the directors of large corporations. If implemented, such a reform would bring U.S. corporate law substantially closer to European countries like Denmark, Germany, and Sweden, where worker codetermination has long been a central feature of corporate governance. An extensive body of theoretical and empirical scholarship analyzes codetermination’s economic impact on corporations and their employees. This Article focuses on a different issue. It examines codetermination’s potential for protecting our democracy against the dangers inherent in the accumulation of extreme wealth and power by private corporations. Concentrated corporate wealth creates the risk that corporations will use their resources to undermine democratic institutions. This Article argues that codetermination can mitigate this risk by splitting corporate voting rights between shareholders and employees, thereby playing a role that is broadly similar to that of the Constitutional separation of powers.
J Dammann and H Eidenmüller, 'Codetermination: A Poor Fit for U.S. Corporations' (2021) 2020 Columbia Business Law Review

DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.3565955
The idea that a corporation’s employees should elect some of the corporation’s board members, a system known as codetermination, has moved to the forefront of U.S. corporate law policy. Elizabeth Warren’s Accountable Capitalism Act calls for employees of large firms to elect forty percent of all board members. Bernie Sanders’s Corporate Accountability and Democracy Plan goes even further and states that workers should elect forty-five percent of board members. Both Warren’s and Sanders’s plans are broadly similar to the German law on codetermination, which for many decades has allowed employees of large German corporations to elect up to half of all board members. It is therefore unsurprising that Senator Sanders points to Germany’s successful economic development as evidence that economic progress and mandatory codetermination can go hand in hand. However, this Article argues that codetermination promises to be a poor fit for U.S. corporations. While Germany arguably reaps significant benefits from codetermination, legal, social, and institutional differences between Germany and the United States make it highly unlikely that the United States would be able to replicate those benefits. Furthermore, the costs of codetermination probably would be much higher in the United States than they are in Germany.
H Eidenmüller, 'Vermitteln auf Leben und Tod' (2021) Frankfurter Allgemeine Zeitung

DOI: https://www.faz.net/einspruch/mediation-im-impfstoffstreit-vermitteln-auf-leben-und-tod-17171591.html

Journal Article (149)

J Dammann and H Eidenmüller, 'Codetermination and the Democratic State' (2022) University of Illinois Law Review (forthcoming)

DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.3680769

Two prominent progressive senators, Bernie Sanders and Elizabeth Warren, have recently proposed that employees should be allowed to elect 40 to 45 percent of the directors of large corporations. If implemented, such a reform would bring U.S. corporate law substantially closer to European countries like Denmark, Germany, and Sweden, where worker codetermination has long been a central feature of corporate governance. An extensive body of theoretical and empirical scholarship analyzes codetermination’s economic impact on corporations and their employees. This Article focuses on a different issue. It examines codetermination’s potential for protecting our democracy against the dangers inherent in the accumulation of extreme wealth and power by private corporations. Concentrated corporate wealth creates the risk that corporations will use their resources to undermine democratic institutions. This Article argues that codetermination can mitigate this risk by splitting corporate voting rights between shareholders and employees, thereby playing a role that is broadly similar to that of the Constitutional separation of powers.

J Dammann and H Eidenmüller, 'Codetermination: A Poor Fit for U.S. Corporations' (2021) 2020 Columbia Business Law Review

DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.3565955

The idea that a corporation’s employees should elect some of the corporation’s board members, a system known as codetermination, has moved to the forefront of U.S. corporate law policy. Elizabeth Warren’s Accountable Capitalism Act calls for employees of large firms to elect forty percent of all board members. Bernie Sanders’s Corporate Accountability and Democracy Plan goes even further and states that workers should elect forty-five percent of board members. Both Warren’s and Sanders’s plans are broadly similar to the German law on codetermination, which for many decades has allowed employees of large German corporations to elect up to half of all board members. It is therefore unsurprising that Senator Sanders points to Germany’s successful economic development as evidence that economic progress and mandatory codetermination can go hand in hand. However, this Article argues that codetermination promises to be a poor fit for U.S. corporations. While Germany arguably reaps significant benefits from codetermination, legal, social, and institutional differences between Germany and the United States make it highly unlikely that the United States would be able to replicate those benefits. Furthermore, the costs of codetermination probably would be much higher in the United States than they are in Germany.

H Eidenmüller, 'Competition Between State Courts and Private Tribunals' (2020) 21 Cardozo Journal of Conflict Resolution 329

DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.3534025

In this essay, I investigate the competition between state courts and private tribunals for dispute resolution. I distinguish between different market segments: B2B and B2C transactions and, in each case, small-, medium- and high-stakes disputes. The analysis is informed by a survey of the dispute resolution preferences of “case placers” carried out in 2015. I find that competition between state courts and arbitral tribunals is currently most intense with respect to high-stakes B2B disputes. A significant portion of the total dispute resolution volume in this market segment goes to arbitration. If parties decide to arbitrate, they do so primarily because of the effective international enforceability of an award, the autonomy to choose competent and neutral arbitrators and the confidentiality of the proceedings. Speed and costs of the proceedings are much less relevant. Commercial arbitrations are usually administered by an arbitral institution. The choice of institution is primarily influenced by its reputation as a professional case manager and by prior positive experiences of the parties. I argue that access to arbitration should be made easier with respect to B2C small- and medium-stakes disputes. The trend in the European Union of promoting conciliation/mediation for the resolution of these disputes should be reversed. Arbitration is less “dangerous” for consumers because it is a legal process governed by fundamental due process guarantees. By contrast, conciliations/mediations are not subject to these guarantees, and they are not well suited for the enforcement of mandatory consumer rights. No compelling case can be made to increase access of businesses to arbitration in medium-stakes B2B disputes. Arbitral institutions have high-powered incentives to design new and efficient procedures for these types of disputes. Technological innovations will reinforce the trend towards privatizing dispute resolution. This poses unique regulatory challenges for the protection of weaker parties, especially consumers.

J Armour and H Eidenmüller, 'Self-Driving Corporations?' (2020) 10 Harvard Business Law Review 87

DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.3442447

What are the implications of artificial intelligence (AI) for corporate law? In this essay, we consider the trajectory of AI’s evolution, analyze the effects of its application on business practice, and investigate the impact of these developments for corporate law. Overall, we claim that the increasing use of AI in corporations implies a shift from viewing the enterprise as primarily private and facilitative, towards a more public, and regulatory, conception of the law governing corporate activity. Today’s AI is dominated by machine learning applications which assist and augment human decision-making. These raise multiple challenges for business organization, the management of which we collectively term ‘data governance’. The impact of today’s AI on corporate law is coming to be felt along two margins. First, we expect a reduction across many standard dimensions of internal agency and coordination costs. Second, the oversight challenges — and liability risks — at the top of the firm will rise significantly. Tomorrow’s AI may permit humans to be replaced even at the apex of corporate decision-making. This is likely to happen first in what we call ‘self-driving subsidiaries’ performing very limited corporate functions. Replacing humans on corporate boards by machines implies a fundamental shift in focus: from controlling internal costs to the design of appropriate strategies for controlling ‘algorithmic failure’, i.e. unlawful acts by an algorithm with potentially severe negative effects (physical or financial harm) on external third parties. We discuss corporate goal-setting, which in the medium term is likely to become the center of gravity for debate on AI and corporate law. This will only intensify as technical progress moves toward the possibility of fully self-driving corporations. We outline potential regulatory strategies for their control. The potential for regulatory competition weakens lawmakers’ ability to respond, and so even though the self-driving corporation is not yet a reality, we believe the regulatory issues deserve attention well before tomorrow’s AI becomes today’s.

H Eidenmüller and F Varesis, 'What is an Arbitration? Artificial Intelligence and the Vanishing Human Arbitrator' (2020) 17 NYU Journal of Law and Business 49

DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.3629145

Technological developments, especially digitization, artificial intelligence (AI), and blockchain technology, are currently disrupting the traditional format and conduct of arbitrations. Stakeholders in the arbitration market are exploring how new technologies and tools can be deployed to increase the efficiency and quality of the arbitration process. The COVID-19 pandemic is accelerating this trend. In this essay, we analyze the “Anatomy of an Arbitration”. We argue that, functionally, fully AI-powered arbitrations will be both technically feasible and should be permitted by the law at some point in the future. There is nothing in the concept of an arbitration that requires human control, governance, or even input. We further argue that the existing legal framework for international commercial arbitrations, the “New York Convention” (NYC) in particular, is capable of adapting to and accommodating fully AI-powered arbitrations. We anticipate significant regulatory competition between jurisdictions to promote technology-assisted or even fully AI-powered arbitrations, and we argue that this competition would be beneficial. In this competition, we expect that common law jurisdictions will enjoy an advantage: machine learning applications for legal decision-making can be developed more easily for jurisdictions in which case law plays a pivotal role.

H Eidenmüller, L Enriques, G Helleringer and K van Zwieten, 'Centros at 20: Regulatory Arbitrage and Beyond—An Introduction' (2019) 20 European Business Organization Law Review 399

DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s40804-019-00162-y

G Wagner and H Eidenmüller, 'Down by Algorithms? Siphoning Rents, Exploiting Biases and Shaping Preferences – The Dark Side of Personalized Transactions' (2019) 86 The University of Chicago Law Review 581

In this Essay, we seek to systematically explore and understand crucial aspects of the dark side of personalized business to consumer (B2C) transactions. We identify three areas of concern. First, businesses increasingly engage in first-degree price discrimination, siphoning rents from consumers. Second, firms exploit widespread or idiosyncratic behavioral biases of consumers in a systematic fashion. And third, businesses use microtargeted ads and recommendations to shape consumers’ preferences and steer them into a particular consumption pattern.

G Wagner and H Eidenmüller, 'In der Falle der Algorithmen? Abschoepfen von Konsumentenrente, Ausnutzen von Verhaltensanomalien und Manipulation von Praeferenzen: Die Regulierung der dunklen Seite personalisierter Transaktionen' (2019) Zeitschrift fuer die gesamte Privatrechtswissenschaft 220

H Eidenmüller, 'Machine Performance and Human Failure: How Shall We Regulate Autonomous Machines?' (2019) 15 Journal of Business & Technology Law 109

Machines powered by artificial intelligence (“AI”) are on the rise. In many use cases, their perfor-mance today already exceeds human capabilities. In this essay, I explore fundamental regulatory issues related to such “autonomous machines.” In doing so, I adopt an analytical perspective that highlights the importance of what this article refers to as the “deep normative structure” of a par-ticular society for crucial policy choices with respect to autonomous machines. This paper makes two principal claims. First, the jargon of welfare economics appears well-suited to analyze the chances and risks of innovative new technologies, and it is also reflected in legal doctrine on risk, responsibility and regulation. A pure welfarist conception of “the good” will tend to move a society into a direction in which autonomous systems will eventually take a prominent role. However, such a conception assumes more than the welfarist calculus can yield, and it also ignores the categorical difference between machine and human characteristic of Western legal systems. Second, taking the “deep normative structure” of Western legal systems seriously leads to policy conclusions re-garding the regulation of autonomous machines that emphasize this categorical difference. Such a humanistic approach acknowledges human weaknesses and failures and protects humans. It is characterized by fundamental human rights and by the desire to achieve some level of distributive justice. Welfaristic pursuits are constrained by these humanistic features, and the severity of these constraints differs from jurisdiction to jurisdiction. The argument is illustrated with legal applica-tions taken from various issues in the field of contract and tort.

J Armour and H Eidenmüller, 'Selbstfahrende Kapitalgesellschaften?' (2019) 183 Zeitschrift für das gesamte Handelsrecht und Wirtschaftsrecht 169

H Eidenmüller, 'Setting Up Dates With Death? The Law and Economics of Extreme Sports Sponsoring in a Comparative Perspective' (2019) 30 Marquette Sports Law Review 191

H Eidenmüller, 'The Rise and Fall of Regulatory Competition of Corporate Insolvency Law in the European Union' (2019) 20 European Business Organization Law Review 547

DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s40804-019-00160-0

In this article, I discuss the rise and fall of regulatory competition in corporate insolvency law in the European Union. The rise is closely associated with the European Insolvency Regulation (EIR, 2002), and it is well documented. The UK has emerged as the ‘market leader’, especially for corporate restructurings. The fall is about to happen, triggered by a combination of factors: the recasting of the EIR (2017), the European Restructuring Directive (ERD, 2019) and Brexit (2019). The UK will lose its dominant market position. I present evidence to support this hypothesis.

H Eidenmüller, 'Collateral Damage: Brexit’s Negative Effects on Regulatory Competition and Legal Innovation in Private Law' (2018) 26 Zeitschrift für Europäisches Privatrecht 868

This article attempts to assess the consequences of Brexit for English and European private law. More specifically, I am interested in how the level of legal innovation in private law will be influenced by Brexit. I argue that Brexit will reduce the level of efficiency-enhancing legal innovation in Member States’ and European private law. My analysis is based on the premise that regulatory competition between the EU Member States is, in principle, beneficial because it initiates a “discovery process” for new and, hopefully, more efficient legal products. It is based on the further premise that Brexit will reduce the level of regulatory competition in the EU. This is so because choosing UK legal products will likely be more difficult in the future—Member States will not be obliged to respect such choices to the same degree as under the current legal regime. As a consequence, Member States will be under less competitive pressure in the future to take note of popular UK, and in particular English, legal products and to improve their own laws as they currently stand. At the same time, reduced choice opportunities and choice certainty for private parties will also reduce the incentives for the UK to innovate—it will no longer be able to export its legal products to continental Europe as easily as under the existing legal regime. In essence, Brexit will eliminate a highly innovative competitor on the European market for new legal products in private law, reducing the beneficial effects of such competition. There is another reason why we can expect the level of legal innovation in private law to decline after Brexit. In the past, the UK has not only been quite successful in developing and exporting private law products to other Member States. It has also made significant contributions to innovative private law-making on the European level. With Brexit, this is set to go. Private law-making on the European level will no longer benefit from the UK’s influence and contributions. Debates will be impoverished and the quality of outcomes might suffer. I substantiate and illustrate the main thesis of this article with examples taken mostly from contract law and dispute resolution, company law and insolvency law.

H Eidenmüller and D Griffiths, 'Mediation in Cross Border Insolvency Procedures' (2018) Global Forensics 10

H Eidenmüller, 'What is an insolvency proceeding?' (2018) 92 American Bankruptcy Law Journal

H Eidenmüller, 'Contracting for a European Insolvency Regime' (2017) 18 European Business Organization Law Review 273

H Eidenmüller and M Fries, 'Entwicklung und Regulierung des deutschen Mediationsmarktes' (2017) 67 Anwaltsblatt 23

H Eidenmüller, 'Negotiating and Mediating Brexit' (2017) 2016 Pepperdine Law Review 39

H Eidenmüller, 'The Rise of Robots and the Law of Humans' (2017) 25 Zeitschrift für Europäisches Privatrecht (ZEuP) 765

Reprinted in Chinese in: Journal of Law and Modernization

H Eidenmüller, 'Caucus-Mediation und Mediationsgesetz' (2016) 37 Zeitschrift für Wirtschaftsrecht (ZIP) 18

H Eidenmüller, 'Was ist ein Insolvenzverfahren?' (2016) 37 Zeitschrift für Wirtschaftsrecht (ZIP) 145

H Eidenmüller, 'Justifying Fair Price Rules in Contract Law' (2015) 11 European Review of Contract Law 220

H Eidenmüller, 'Obligatorische außergerichtliche Streitbeilegung: Eine contradictio in adiecto?' (2015) 75 Juristenzeitung (JZ) 401

H Eidenmüller and K van Zweiten, 'Restructuring the European Business Enterprise: The EU Commission Recommendation on a New Approach to Business Failure and Insolvency' (2015) 16 European Business Organization Law Review 625

H Eidenmüller and M Engel, 'Schlichtungszwang in Verbraucherstreitigkeiten' (2015) 128 Zeitschrift für Zivilprozeß (ZZP) 149

H Eidenmüller, 'Where Do Firms Issue Debt? An Empirical Analysis of Issuer Location and Regulatory Competition in Europe' (2015) 41 International Review of Law and Economics 103

H Eidenmüller and C Behme, 'Zum Haftungsumfang bei Straßenverkehrsunfällen nach italienischem Recht' (2015) 28 Jahrbuch für italienisches Recht 121

H Eidenmüller and M Engel, 'Against False Settlement: Designing Efficient Consumer Rights Enforcement Systems in Europe' (2014) 29 Ohio State Journal on Dispute Resolution 261

H Eidenmüller, 'Der Insolvenzplan als gesellschaftsrechtliches Universalwerkzeug' (2014) Neue Juristische Wochenschrift (NJW) 17

H Eidenmüller, 'Die Restrukturierungsempfehlung der EU-Kommission und das deutsche Restrukturierungsrecht' (2014) 75 Zeitschrift für Insolvenzrecht (KTS) 401

H Eidenmüller, 'A New Framework for Business Restructuring in Europe: The EU Commission’s Proposals for a Reform of the European Insolvency Regulation and Beyond' (2013) 20 Maastricht Journal of European and Comparative Law 133

H Eidenmüller, 'Ausbildung zum zertifizierten Mediator' (2013) Zeitschrift für Konfliktmanagement (ZKM) 71

H Eidenmüller and M Engel, 'Die Schlichtungsfalle: Verbraucherrechtsdurchsetzung nach der ADR-Richtlinie und der ODR-Verordnung der EU' (2013) 34 Zeitschrift für Wirtschaftsrecht (ZIP) 1704

H Eidenmüller, R Braun , A Engert and L Hornuf, 'Does Charter Competition Foster Entrepreneurship? A Difference-in-Difference Approach to European Company Law Reforms' (2013) 51 Journal of Common Market Studies 399

H Eidenmüller and T Frobenius, 'Ein Regulierungskonzept zur Bewältigung von Gruppeninsolvenzen: Verfahrenskonsolidierung im Kontext nationaler und internationaler Reformvorhaben' (2013) Zeitschrift für Wirtschaftsrecht 1

H Eidenmüller and M Engel, 'Schöne neue Schlichtungswelt' (2013) Frankfurter Allgemeine Zeitung (FAZ) 7

H Eidenmüller, R Braun , A Engert and L Hornuf, 'Unternehmensgründungen unter dem Einfluss des Wettbewerbs der Gesellschaftsrechte' (2013) 177 Zeitschrift für das gesamte Handelsrecht und Wirtschaftsrecht (ZHR) 131

H Eidenmüller, 'Wege aus der Sackgasse: Wie lassen sich Blockaden in Mediations- und Güteverfahren lösen?' (2013) Zeitschrift für Konfliktmanagement (ZKM) 4

H Eidenmüller, 'What Can Be Wrong With an Option? An Optional Common European Sales Law as a Regulatory Tool' (2013) 50 Common Market Law Review 69

H Eidenmüller, L Hornuf and M Reps, 'Contracting Employee Involvement: An Analysis of Bargaining Over Employee Involvement Rules for a Societas Europaea' (2012) 12 Journal of Corporate Law Studies 201

H Eidenmüller, E-M Kieninger, N Jansen and G Wagner, 'Der Vorschlag für eine Verordnung über ein Gemeinsames Europäisches Kaufrecht: Defizite der neuesten Textstufe des europäischen Vertragsrechts' (2012) Juristenzeitung (JZ) 269

H Eidenmüller, 'Ein Mediationsgesetz für Deutschland' (2012) Der Betrieb (DB) 1

H Eidenmüller, Gregor Bachmann, Andreas Engert and Holger Fleischer , 'Regulating the Closed Corporation' (2012) Special Volume 4 European Company and Financial Law Review (ECFR)

H Eidenmüller and J Lasák, 'The Czech Societas Europaea Puzzle' (2012) 12 Journal of Corporate Law Studies 237

H Eidenmüller, E-M Kieninger, N Jansen and G Wagner, 'The Proposal for a Regulation on a Common European Sales Law: Deficits of the Most Recent Textual Layer of European Contract Law' (2012) 16 The Edinburgh Law Review 301

H Eidenmüller, 'Trauerrede anlässlich eines Requiems für Staatsanwalt Tilman Turck' (2012) Deutsche Richterzeitung (DRiZ) 100

H Eidenmüller, 'Vermitteln unter falschem Etikett' (2012) Frankfurter Allgemeine Zeitung (FAZ) 8

H Eidenmüller and A Hacke, 'Das Experiment' (2011) Frankfurter Allgemeine Zeitung (FAZ) 8

H Eidenmüller, 'Die Eigenverwaltung im System des Restrukturierungsrechts' (2011) 175 Zeitschrift für das gesamte Handelsrecht und Wirtschaftsrecht (ZHR) 11

H Eidenmüller and T Frobenius, 'Die internationale Reichweite eines englischen Scheme of Arrangement' (2011) Wertpapier-Mitteilungen (WM) 1210

H Eidenmüller, 'Liberaler Paternalismus' (2011) 814 Juristenzeitung (JZ)

H Eidenmüller, 'The Transnational Law Market, Regulatory Competition, and Transnational Corporations' (2011) 18 Indiana Journal of Global Legal Studies (Ind. J. Global Legal Stud.) 707

H Eidenmüller, F Faust , C Grigoleit and N Jansen, 'Towards a Revision of the Consumer Acquis' (2011) Common Market Law Review 1077

H Eidenmüller, 'Why Withdrawal Rights?' (2011) 7 European Review of Contract Law

H Eidenmüller, 'Die Rechtfertigung von Widerrufsrechten' (2010) 210 Archiv für die civilistische Praxis (AcP) 67

H Eidenmüller, J Basedow, C Grigoleit and S Grundmann and others, 'Ein europäisches Vertragsrecht kommt – aber zu welchem Preis?' (2010) Frankfurter Allgemeine Zeitung (FAZ) 8

H Eidenmüller, A Engert and L Hornuf, 'How Does the Market React to the Societas Europaea?' (2010) 11 European Business Organization Law Review (EBOR) 35

H Eidenmüller, 'Reformperspektiven im Restrukturierungsrecht' (2010) 31 Zeitschrift für Wirtschaftsrecht (ZIP) 649

H Eidenmüller, T Frobenius and W Prusko, 'Regulierungswettbewerb im Unternehmensinsolvenzrecht: Ergebnisse einer empirischen Untersuchung' (2010) Neue Zeitschrift für das Recht der Insolvenz und Sanierung (NZI) 545

H Eidenmüller, 'Sollte ein vorinsolvenzliches Sanierungsverfahren eingeführt werden?' (2010) Wertpapier-Mitteilungen (WM) 1337

H Eidenmüller, 'Abuse of Law in the Context of European Insolvency Law' (2009) European Company and Financial Law Review (ECFR) 1

H Eidenmüller, A Engert and L Hornuf, 'Incorporating under European Law: The Societas Europaea as a Vehicle for Legal Arbitrage' (2009) 10 European Business Organization Law Review (EBOR) 1

H Eidenmüller, 'Kampf um die Ware Recht' (2009) Frankfurter Allgemeine Zeitung (FAZ) 110

H Eidenmüller, 'Party Autonomy, Distributive Justice, and the Conclusion of Contracts in the DCFR' (2009) 5 European Review of Contract Law 109

H Eidenmüller, 'Recht als Produkt' (2009) Juristenzeitung (JZ) 641

H Eidenmüller, 'Rechtsmissbrauch im Europäischen Insolvenzrecht' (2009) 70 Zeitschrift für Insolvenzrecht (KTS) 137

H Eidenmüller and A Engert, 'Reformperspektiven einer Umwandlung von Fremd- in Eigenkapital (Debt-Equity Swap) im Insolvenzplanverfahren' (2009) 30 Zeitschrift für Wirtschaftsrecht (ZIP) 541

H Eidenmüller, 'Regulierung des Mediationsberufs' (2009) Zeitschrift für Konfliktmanagement (ZKM) 35

H Eidenmüller, A Engert and L Hornuf, 'Vom Wert der Wahlfreiheit: Eine empirische Analyse der Societas Europaea als Rechtsformalternative' (2009) Die Aktiengesellschaft (AG) 845

H Eidenmüller, A Engert and L Hornuf, 'Why Do Firms Incorporate Under European Law?' (2009) Finanzplatz September 20

H Eidenmüller, 'Der Gemeinsame Referenzrahmen für das Europäische Privatrecht: Wertungsfragen und Kodifikationsprobleme' (2008) Juristenzeitung (JZ) 529

H Eidenmüller and M Prause, 'Die europäische Mediationsrichtlinie: Perspektiven für eine gesetzliche Regelung der Mediation in Deutschland' (2008) Neue Juristische Wochenschrift (NJW) 2737

H Eidenmüller, 'Die Mediationsrichtlinie' (2008) Zeitschrift für Konfliktmanagement (ZKM) 3

H Eidenmüller, A Engert and L Hornuf, 'Die Societas Europaea: Empirische Bestandsaufnahme und Entwicklungslinien einer neuen Rechtsform' (2008) Die Aktiengesellschaft (AG) 721

H Eidenmüller, 'Nachruf zum Tod von Andreas Heldrich' (2008) Rabels Zeitschrift (RabelsZ) 1

H Eidenmüller, 'Privatisierung der Insolvenzabwicklung: Workouts, Covenants, Mediation – Modelle für den Insolvenzstandort Deutschland?' (2008) 121 Zeitschrift für Zivilprozeß (ZZP) 273

H Eidenmüller, F Faust, H C Grigoleit and N Jansen, 'The Common Frame of Reference for European Private Law: Policy Choices and Codification Problems' (2008) 28 Oxford Journal of Legal Studies 659

H Eidenmüller, 'The Position of Secured Creditors in Insolvency' (2008) Special Volume 2 European Company and Financial Law Review (ECFR) 273

H Eidenmüller, 'Die GmbH im Wettbewerb der Rechtsformen' (2007) 36 Zeitschrift für Unternehmens- und Gesellschaftsrecht (ZGR) 168

H Eidenmüller, 'Exerting Pressure in Contractual Negotiations' (2007) 3 European Review of Contract Law 21

H Eidenmüller, 'Leveraged Buyouts und die Effizienz des deutschen Restrukturierungsrechts' (2007) 28 Zeitschrift für Wirtschaftsrecht (ZIP) 1729

H Eidenmüller, 'Private Equity, Leverage, und die Effizienz des Gläubigerschutzrechts' (2007) 171 Zeitschrift für das gesamte Handelsrecht und Wirtschaftsrecht (ZHR) 664

H Eidenmüller, 'Prozessrisikoanalyse in der Praxis' (2007) Zeitschrift für Konfliktmanagement (ZKM) 115

H Eidenmüller, 'Regulierung von Finanzinvestoren' (2007) Deutsches Steuerrecht (DStR) 2116

H Eidenmüller and M Rehberg, 'Umgehung von Gewerbeverboten mittels Auslandsgesellschaften' (2007) Neue Juristische Wochenschrift (NJW) 28

H Eidenmüller, 'Co-Mediation' (2006) Zeitschrift für Konfliktmanagement (ZKM)

H Eidenmüller, B Grunewald and U Noack, 'Das Mindestkapital im System des festen Kapitals' (2006) Special Volume 17 Zeitschrift für Unternehmens- und Gesellschaftsrecht (ZGR) 17

H Eidenmüller, 'Gesellschaftsstatut und Insolvenzstatut' (2006) 70 Rabels Zeitschrift (RabelsZ) 474

H Eidenmüller, B Grunewald and U Noack, 'Minimum Capital within the System of Legal Capital' (2006) Special Volume 1 European Company and Financial Law Review (ECFR) 17

H Eidenmüller and M Rehberg, 'Rechnungslegung bei Auslandsgesellschaften' (2006) 105 Zeitschrift für Vergleichende Rechtswissenschaft (ZVglRWiss) 427

H Eidenmüller, 'Trading in Times of Crisis: Formal Insolvency Proceedings, Workouts, and the Incentives for Shareholders/Managers' (2006) 7 European Business Organization Law Review (EBOR) 467

H Eidenmüller, 'Wettbewerb der Insolvenzrechte?' (2006) 35 Zeitschrift für Unternehmens- und Gesellschaftsrecht (ZGR) 467

H Eidenmüller, 'Der homo oeconomicus und das Schuldrecht: Herausforderungen durch Behavioral Law and Economics' (2005) Juristenzeitung (JZ) 216

H Eidenmüller and A Engert, 'Die angemessene Höhe des Grundkapitals der Aktiengesellschaft' (2005) Die Aktiengesellschaft (AG) 97

H Eidenmüller, 'Ein Rechtsrahmen für die Mediation in Europa' (2005) Journal of International Dispute Resolution (IDR) 1

H Eidenmüller, 'Establishing a Legal Framework for Mediation in Europe: The Proposal for an EC Mediation Directive' (2005) German Arbitration Journal (Zeitschrift für Schiedsverfahren) (SchiedsVZ) 124

H Eidenmüller, 'Free Choice in International Company Insolvency Law in Europe' (2005) 6 European Business Organization Law Review (EBOR) 423

H Eidenmüller, 'Geschäftsleiter- und Gesellschafterhaftung bei europäischen Auslandsgesellschaften mit tatsächlichem Inlandssitz' (2005) Neue Juristische Wochenschrift (NJW) 1618

H Eidenmüller, 'Glückwunsch zum 70. Geburtstag von Andreas Heldrich' (2005) Juristenzeitung (JZ) 83

H Eidenmüller and A Engert, 'Rechtsökonomik des Mindestkapitals im GmbH-Recht' (2005) GmbH Rundschau (GmbHR) 433

H Eidenmüller, 'Verfahrenskoordination bei Konzerninsolvenzen' (2005) 169 Zeitschrift für das gesamte Handelsrecht und Wirtschaftsrecht (ZHR) 528

H Eidenmüller, 'Der Markt für internationale Konzerninsolvenzen: Zuständigkeitskonflikte unter der EuInsVO' (2004) Neue Juristische Wochenschrift (NJW) 3455

H Eidenmüller, 'Die Dogmatik der Zession vor dem Hintergrund der internationalen Entwicklung' (2004) 204 Archiv für die civilistische Praxis (AcP) 457

H Eidenmüller, 'Gerichtsinterne Mediation' (2004) Zeitschrift für Konfliktmanagement (ZKM) 243

H Eidenmüller, 'Mobilität und Restrukturierung von Unternehmen im Binnenmarkt: Entwicklungsperspektiven des europäischen Gesellschaftsrechts im Schnittfeld von Gemeinschaftsgesetzgeber und EuGH' (2004) Juristenzeitung (JZ) 24

H Eidenmüller and G Rehm, 'Niederlassungsfreiheit versus Schutz des inländischen Rechtsverkehrs: Konturen des Europäischen Internationalen Gesellschaftsrechts' (2004) 33 Zeitschrift für Unternehmens- und Gesellschaftsrecht (ZGR) 159

H Eidenmüller and A Staudinger, 'Verjährungshemmung leicht gemacht: Prospekthaftung der Telekom vor der Gütestelle' (2004) Neue Juristische Wochenschrift (NJW) 23

H Eidenmüller, 'Die Auswirkung der Einleitung eines ADR-Verfahrens auf die Verjährung' (2003) Zeitschrift für Schiedsverfahren (SchiedsVZ) 163

H Eidenmüller, 'Güteverhandlung im Zivilprozeß' (2003) Zeitschrift für Konfliktmanagement (ZKM) 239

H Eidenmüller and A Hacke, 'Institutionalisierung der Mediation im betrieblichen Konfliktmanagement' (2003) Personalführung 20

H Eidenmüller, 'A Legal Framework for National and International Mediation Proceedings' (2002) 12 Journal of International Dispute Resolution (IDR) 14

H Eidenmüller, 'Die Verjährung beim Rechtskauf' (2002) Neue Juristische Wochenschrift (NJW) 1625

H Eidenmüller, 'Hybride ADR-Verfahren bei internationalen Wirtschaftskonflikten' (2002) Recht der internationalen Wirtschaft (RIW) 1

H Eidenmüller, 'Rechtskauf und Unternehmenskauf' (2002) Zeitschrift für das gesamte Schuldrecht (ZGS) 290

H Eidenmüller, 'Reform der Juristenausbildung' (2002) , Zeitschrift für Konfliktmanagement (ZKM) 235

H Eidenmüller, 'Wettbewerb der Gesellschaftsrechte in Europa: Zugleich Besprechung des Urteils des Europäischen Gerichtshofs vom 5.11.2002 in der Rechtssache C-208/00 (Überseering)' (2002) 23 Zeitschrift für Wirtschaftsrecht (ZIP) 2233

H Eidenmüller, 'Der nationale und der internationale Insolvenzverwaltungsvertrag' (2001) 114 Zeitschrift für Zivilprozeß (ZZP) 3

H Eidenmüller, 'Der Spinnerei-Fall: Die Lehre von der Geschäftsgrundlage nach der Rechtsprechung des Reichsgerichts und im Lichte der Schuldrechtsmodernisierung' (2001) Juristische Ausbildung (JURA) 824

H Eidenmüller, 'Europäische Verordnung über Insolvenzverfahren und zukünftiges deutsches internationales Insolvenzrecht' (2001) Praxis des Internationalen Privat- und Verfahrensrechts (IPRax) 2

H Eidenmüller, 'Gesellschafterstellung und Insolvenzplan' (2001) 30 Zeitschrift für Unternehmens- und Gesellschaftsrecht (ZGR) 680

H Eidenmüller, 'Kapitalgesellschaftsrecht im Spiegel der ökonomischen Theorie' (2001) Juristenzeitung (JZ) 1041

H Eidenmüller, 'Mediation und Recht' (2001) Zeitschrift für Konfliktmanagement (ZKM) 155

H Eidenmüller, 'Zur Effizienz der Verjährungsregeln im geplanten Schuldrechtsmodernisierungsgesetz' (2001) Juristenzeitung (JZ) 283

H Eidenmüller, 'Grenzüberschreitende Insolvenzen im Spannungsfeld von Territorialität und Ubiquität des Rechts' (2000) 18 Jahrbuch für Neue Politische Ökonomie Band 81

H Eidenmüller, 'Prozeßrisikoanalyse' (2000) 113 Zeitschrift für Zivilprozeß (ZZP) 5

H Eidenmüller, 'Prognoseentscheidungen im Insolvenzplanverfahren: Verfahrenslähmung durch Minderheitenschutz?' (1999) Neue Juristische Wochenschrift (NJW) 1837

H Eidenmüller, 'Rechtswissenschaft als Realwissenschaft' (1999) Juristenzeitung (JZ) 53

H Eidenmüller, 'Der Auskunftsanspruch des nichtehelichen Kindes gegen seine Mutter auf Benennung des leiblichen Vaters' (1998) ”, Juristische Schulung (JuS) 789

H Eidenmüller, 'Mediationstechniken bei Unternehmenssanierungen' (1998) 10th Suppl to Issue 40 Der Betriebs-Berater (BB) 19

H Eidenmüller and G Rehm, 'Gesellschafts- und zivilrechtliche Folgeprobleme der Sitztheorie' (1997) 27 Zeitschrift für Unternehmens- und Gesellschaftsrecht (ZGR) 89

H Eidenmüller, 'Rechtsanwendung, Gesetzgebung, und ökonomische Analyse' (1997) 197 Archiv für die civilistische Praxis (AcP) 80

H Eidenmüller, 'Urteilsanmerkung zu EuGH 8.10.1996 (Pauschalreiserichtlinie)' (1997) Juristenzeitung (JZ) 201

H Eidenmüller, 'Der Insolvenzplan als Vertrag' (1996) 15 Jahrbuch für Neue Politische Ökonomie Band 164

H Eidenmüller, 'Die Banken im Gefangenendilemma: Kooperationspflichten und Akkordstörungsverbot im Sanierungsrecht' (1996) 160 Zeitschrift für das gesamte Handelsrecht und Wirtschaftsrecht (ZHR 343

H Eidenmüller, 'Wertersatz für rechtsgrundlos erbrachte Bauleistungen' (1996) Juristenzeitung (JZ) 889

H Eidenmüller, 'Einstweiliger Rechtsschutz und europäisches Vergaberecht' (1995) Europäische Zeitschrift für Wirtschaftsrecht (EuZW) 632

H Eidenmüller, 'Neuverhandlungspflichten bei Wegfall der Geschäftsgrundlage' (1995) 16 Zeitschrift für Wirtschaftsrecht (ZIP) 1063

H Eidenmüller, 'Discovery und materiellrechtlicher Auskunftsanspruch im deutschen Unterhaltsprozeß: Anpassung durch Qualifikation?' (1992) Praxis des Internationalen Privat- und Verfahrensrechts (IPRax) 356

H Eidenmüller, 'Elektronischer Pressespiegel' (1992) Computer und Recht (CR) 321

H Eidenmüller, 'Der unliebsame Kritiker: Theaterkritik und Schmähkritik' (1991) Neue Juristische Wochenschrift (NJW) 1439

H Eidenmüller and A Heldrich, 'Die rechtlichen Auswirkungen der Wiedervereinigung Deutschlands aus der Sicht von Drittstaaten' (1991) Juristische Blätter (öjBl) 273

H Eidenmüller, 'Rights, Systems of Rights, and Unger’s System of Rights: Part 1' (1991) Law and Philosophy 1

H Eidenmüller, 'Unger’s System of Rights: Part 2' (1991) Law and Philosophy 119

H Eidenmüller, 'Vorausvermächtnis und Teilungsanordnung' (1991) Juristische Arbeitsblätter (JA) 150

H Eidenmüller, 'Deregulating the Market for Legal Services in the European Community: Freedom of Establishment and Freedom to Provide Services for EC Lawyers in the Federal Republic of Germany' (1990) Modern Law Review 604

H Eidenmüller and A Heldrich, 'Rechtsprobleme der deutschen Wiedervereinigung' (1990) 967 Jurisuto 61

H Eidenmüller, 'Vision and Practice: Remarks on Unger's System of Rights' (1990) Rechtstheorie 71

H Eidenmüller and K Schmidt , 'Zur Schutzdauer wegen vermeidbarer Herkunftstäuschung bei technischen Produkten' (1990) Gewerblicher Rechtsschutz und Urheberrecht (GRUR) 337

H Eidenmüller, 'Versuch einer Überwindung des Utilitarismus bei John Rawls' (1987) Archiv für Rechts- und Sozialphilosophie (ARSP) 235

Other (8)

H Eidenmüller, 'Vermitteln auf Leben und Tod' (2021) Frankfurter Allgemeine Zeitung

DOI: https://www.faz.net/einspruch/mediation-im-impfstoffstreit-vermitteln-auf-leben-und-tod-17171591.html

G Wagner and H Eidenmüller, 'In der Falle der Algorithmen' (2019) Frankfurter Allgemeine Zeitung

J Armour and H Eidenmüller, 'Self-driving Corporations' (2019) Harvard Law School Forum on Corporate Governance

DOI: https://corpgov.law.harvard.edu/2019/10/08/self-driving-corporations/.

H Eidenmüller, 'Why the UK and EU need mediation to unpick the Brexit mess' (2019) Financial Times

H Eidenmüller, 'Stolz und Vorurteil' (2018) Süddeutsche Zeitung

DOI: https://www.sueddeutsche.de/politik/aussenansicht-stolz-und-vorurteil-1.4172131

H Eidenmüller, S Grundmann , S Kalss and W Kerber and others, 'Schriften zum Europäischen und Internationalen Privat-, Bank- und Wirtschaftsrecht' (2016) de Gruyter

H Eidenmüller, 'Regulierung von Ausbildungsinstitutionen' (2014) Zeitschrift für Konfliktmanagement (ZKM) 75

H Eidenmüller, 'Commentary on §§ 1, 3, 4 and 9' (2004) C H Beck Ausländische Kapitalgesellschaften im deutschen Recht

Internet Publication (13)

J Dammann and H Eidenmüller, 'Codetermination: A Poor Fit for U.S. Corporations' (2020) Harvard Law School Forum on Corporate Governance

DOI: https://corpgov.law.harvard.edu/2020/04/28/codetermination-a-poor-fit-for-u-s-corporations/

H Eidenmüller and K van Zwieten, 'COVID-19 and Beyond: The Case for Creditor Cooperation Duties in Corporate Workouts' (2020) Oxford Business Law Blog

J Dammann and H Eidenmüller, 'Taming the Corporate Leviathan: Codetermination and the Democratic State' (2020) Harvard Law School Forum on Corporate Governance

H Eidenmüller and F Varesis, 'The Vanishing Point of Human Arbitration in Artificial Intelligence' (2020) Machine Lawyering

H Eidenmüller and G Wagner, 'Down by Algorithms? Siphoning Rents, Exploiting Biases and Shaping Preferences – The Dark Side of Personalized Transactions' (2018) Oxford Business Law Blog

H Eidenmüller and N Aggarwal, 'Introducing a Special Series on Law and Autonomous Systems' (2018) Oxford Business Law Blog

H Eidenmüller, 'Machine Performance and Human Failure' (2018) Oxford Business Law Blog

H Eidenmüller, 'Robots’ Legal Personality' (2017) Oxford Business Law Blog

H Eidenmüller and A Hacke, 'The PPP Negotiation Model: Problem, People, and Process' (2017) Oxford Business Law Blog

H Eidenmüller, 'Brexit Negotiation Games' (2016) Oxford Business Law Blog

H Eidenmüller, C Behme, M Habersack and L Klöhn, 'Corporate Co-Determination German Style as a Model for the UK?' (2016) Oxford Business Law Blog

H Eidenmüller and K van Zweiten, 'The Future of Restructuring Law in Europe: Greater Harmonisation, but at What Cost?' (2016) Oxford Business Law Blog

H Eidenmüller, 'Zertifizierte Mediatoren' (2016) 46 NJW-aktuell 15

Chapter (51)

H Eidenmüller and K van Zwieten, 'Covid-19 and Beyond: The Case for Creditor Cooperation Duties in Corporate Workouts' in (ed), Covid-19 and Business Law (München, Oxford and Baden-Baden: C. H. Beck, Hart Publishing and Nomos 2020)

K van Zwieten, H Eidenmüller and L Enriques, 'Covid-19: A Global Moratorium for Corporate Bonds?' in H Eidenmüller, L Enriques, G Helleringer and K van Zwieten (eds), Covid-19 and Business Law (München, Oxford and Baden-Baden: C. H. Beck, Hart Publishing and Nomos 2020)

H Eidenmüller, 'The Race to Fight Covid-19: On the Desirability of Regulatory Competition' in H Eidenmüller, L Enriques, G Helleringer and K van Zwieten (eds), Covid-19 and Business Law (München, Oxford and Baden-Baden: C. H. Beck, Hart Publishing and Nomos 2020)

H Eidenmüller, 'Machine Performance and Human Failure: How Shall We Regulate Autonomous Machines?' in N Aggarwal, H Eidenmüller, L Enriques, J Payne and K van Zwieten (eds), Autonomous Systems and the Law (München and Baden-Baden: C. H. Beck and Nomos 2019)

DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.3414602

Machines powered by artificial intelligence (AI) are on the rise. In many use cases, their performance today already exceeds human capabilities. In this essay, I explore fundamental regulatory issues related to such “autonomous machines”. I adopt an analytical perspective that highlights the importance of what I call the “deep normative structure” of a particular society for crucial policy choices with respect to autonomous machines. I make two principal claims. First, the jargon of welfare economics appears well-suited to analyse the chances and risks of innovative new technologies, and it is also reflected in legal doctrine on risk, responsibility and regulation. A pure welfarist conception of “the good” will tend to move a society into a direction in which autonomous systems eventually will take a super-prominent role. However, such a conception assumes more than the welfarist calculus can yield, and it also ignores the categorical difference between machines and humans characteristic of Western legal systems. Second, taking the “deep normative structure” of Western legal systems seriously leads to policy conclusions regarding the regulation of autonomous machines that emphasize this categorical difference. Such a humanistic approach acknowledges human weaknesses and failures and protects humans, and it is characterized by fundamental human rights and by the desire to achieve some level of distributive justice. Welfaristic pursuits are constrained by these humanistic features, and the severity of these constraints differs from jurisdiction to jurisdiction. I illustrate my argument with legal applications taken from various issues in the field of contract and tort.

H Eidenmüller, 'Comparative Corporate Insolvency Law' in J N Gordon and W G Ringe (eds), The Oxford Handbook of Corporate Law and Governance (Oxford University Press 2018)

H Eidenmüller, 'Marktwirtschaft, Privatrecht und Verteilungsgerechtigkeit' in I Pies and M Leschke (eds), John Rawls’ politischer Liberalismus (Mohr Siebeck 2018)

H Eidenmüller and H Großerichter, 'Alternative Dispute Resolution' in J Basedow, G Rühl, F Ferrari, P de Miguel Asensio (ed), Encyclopedia of Private International Law (Elgar 2017)

H Eidenmüller and J Stark, 'Behavioural Economics and Private International Law' in J Basedow, G Rühl, F Ferrari, P de Miguel Asensio (ed), Encyclopedia of Private International Law (Elgar 2017)

H Eidenmüller, 'How to Negotiate a Successful Brexit' in J Armour and H Eidenmuller (eds), Negotiating Brexit (Hart 2017)

H Eidenmüller, 'Online Dispute Resolution (ODR) und Consumer ADR: Ein Plädoyer für die Online-Verbraucher(schieds)gerichtsbarkeit' in (ed), Bitburger Gespräche – Jahrbuch 2016: Schiedsgerichtsbarkeit und private Justiz: Rechtspolitische Herausforderungen (C H Beck 2017)

H Eidenmüller and Gerhard Wagner, 'Chapter 1' in H Eidenmüller and G Wagner (eds), Mediationsrecht (Otto Schmidt 2015)

H Eidenmüller, 'Chapter 4 ' in H Eidenmüller and G Wagner (eds), Mediationsrecht (Otto Schmidt 2015)

H Eidenmüller, 'Chapter 5' in H Eidenmüller and G Wagner (eds), Mediationsrecht (Otto Schmidt 2015)

H Eidenmüller, 'Lex Mercatoria, the ISDA Master Agreement, and Ius Cogens' in S Grundmann, F Möslein, and K Riesenhuber (eds), Contract Governance (Oxford University Press 2015)

H Eidenmüller, 'Commentary on § 217, § 218, § 221, § 222, § 225a and § 230 of the German Insolvency Code ' in H-P Kirchhof, R Stürner, H Eidenmüller (ed), Münchener Kommentar zur Insolvenzordnung (C H Beck 2013)

H Eidenmüller, 'Regulatory Competition in Contract Law and Dispute Resolution' in H Eidenmuller (ed), Regulatory Competition in Contract Law and Dispute Resolution (C H Beck and Hart 2013)

H Eidenmüller, 'Was kann an einer Option falsch sein? Ein optionales gemeinsames europäisches Kaufrecht als Regulierungsinstrument' in A Bruns et al (ed), Festschrift für Rolf Stürner zum 70. Geburtstag Band II (Mohr Siebeck 2013)

H Eidenmüller, 'Analytische Methoden für Juristen: Methodenlehre 2012' in H Hof and G von Olenhusen (eds), Rechtsgestaltung – Rechtskritik – Konkurrenz von Rechtsordnungen … Neue Akzente für die Juristenausbildung (Nomos 2012)

H Eidenmüller and J Lasák, 'Das tschechische Societas Europaea-Rätsel' in B Erle et al (ed), Festschrift für Peter Hommelhoff zum 70. Geburtstag (Otto Schmidt 2012)

H Eidenmüller, 'Die Rolle von Verhandlungsmanagement und Mediation in der Juristenausbildung' in H Hof and G von Olenhusen (eds), Rechtsgestaltung – Rechtskritik – Konkurrenz von Rechtsordnungen … Neue Akzente für die Juristenausbildung (Nomos 2012)

H Eidenmüller, A Engert and L Hornuf, 'Europäischer Rechtswettbewerb bei der Wahl des Emissionsstandorts für Schuldtitel: Eine empirische Analyse' in P Behrens et al (ed), Ökonomische Analyse des Europarechts (Mohr Siebeck 2012)

H Eidenmüller, 'Unternehmenssanierung nach der Insolvenzrechtsreform 2011' in M Habersack et al (ed), Stärkung des Anlegerschutzes – Neuer Rechtsrahmen für Sanierungen (Bankrechtstag 2011) (de Gruyter 2012)

H Eidenmüller, 'Alternative Streitbeilegung in Deutschland und das Centrum für Verhandlungen und Mediation' in H Eidenmuller (ed), Alternative Streitbeilegung: Neue Entwicklungen und Strategien zur frühzeitigen Konfliktbewältigung (C H Beck 2011)

H Eidenmüller, 'Ludwig-Maximilians-Universität München: Lehrstuhl für Bürgerliches Recht, Deutsches, Europäisches und Internationales Unternehmensrecht' in H Schmidt (ed), INDat 2011/2012 (Verlag INDat-GmbH 2011)

H Eidenmüller, 'Widerrufsrechte' in H Eidenmüller, F Faust, H C Grigoleit, N Jansen, G Wagner, and R Zimmermann (eds), Die Revision des Verbraucher-acquis (Mohr Siebeck 2011)

H Eidenmüller, 'Restrukturierung systemrelevanter Finanzinstitute' in S Grundmann et als (ed), Unternehmen, Markt und Verantwortung: Festschrift für Klaus J. Hopt zum 70. Geburtstag am 24. August 2010 (de Gruyter 2010)

H Eidenmüller and A Engert, 'Insolvenzrechtliche Ausschüttungssperren' in G Bitter et al (ed), Festschrift für Karsten Schmidt zum 70. Geburtstag (Otto Schmidt 2009)

H Eidenmüller, 'Privatautonomie, Verteilungsgerechtigkeit und das Recht des Vertragsschlusses im DCFR' in C von Bar, H Schulte-Nölke and R Schulze (eds), Der akademische Entwurf für einen gemeinsamen Referenzrahmen: Kontroversen und Perspektiven (Mohr Siebeck 2008)

H Eidenmüller, 'Commentary on § 217, § 218, § 221, § 222, § 225a and § 230 of the German Insolvency Code' in H-P Kirchhof, R Stürner, H Eidenmüller (ed), Münchener Kommentar zur Insolvenzordnung (C H Beck 2007)

H Eidenmüller, 'Die Reichweite des Gesellschaftsstatuts' in H J Sonnenberger (ed), Vorschläge und Berichte zur Reform des europäischen und deutschen Internationalen Gesellschaftsrechts: Vorgelegt im Auftrag der zweiten Kommission des Deutschen Rates für Internationales Privatrecht, Spezialkommission für Internationales Gesellschaftsrech (Mohr Siebeck 2007)

H Eidenmüller, 'Druckmittel in Vertragsverhandlungen' in R Zimmerman (ed), Störungen der Willensbildung bei Vertragsschluss (Mohr Siebeck 2007)

H Eidenmüller, 'Gesellschafterdarlehen in der Insolvenz' in A Heldrich et al (ed), Festschrift für Claus-Wilhelm Canaris zum 70. Geburtstag Band II (C H Beck 2007)

H Eidenmüller, 'Free Choice in Corporate Law: European and German Corporate Law in European Competition between Corporate Law Systems' in J Basedow, T Kono, G Rühl (ed), An Economic Analysis of Private International Law (Mohr Siebeck 2006)

H Eidenmüller, 'Europäisches und deutsches Gesellschaftsrecht im europäischen Wettbewerb der Gesellschaftsrechte' in S Lorenz, A Trunk, H Eidenmüller, Ch Wendehorst, J Adolff (ed), Festschrift für Andreas Heldrich zum 70. Geburtstag (C H Beck 2005)

H Eidenmüller, 'Internationale Entwicklungen im Recht der Kreditsicherheiten' in W Hadding, K J Hopt and H Schimansky (eds), Internes und Externes Rating, Aktuelle Entwicklungen im Recht der Kreditsicherheiten – national und international (de Gruyter 2005)

H Eidenmüller and A Engert, 'Prioritätsgrundsatz, Vertragsbruchtheorie und die richtige Zuweisung von Kreditsicherheiten' in R Bork, Th Hoeren and P Pohlmann (eds), Recht und Risiko: Festschrift für Helmut Kollhosser zum 70. Geburtstag (Verlag Versicherungswirtschaft 2004)

H Eidenmüller, 'Verhandlungsanalyse, Vertragsparität und Vertragsrecht' in C Ott and H-B Schäfer (eds), Ökonomische Analyse des Sozialschutzprinzips im Zivilrecht (Mohr Siebeck 2004)

H Eidenmüller, 'Verhandlungsmanagement durch Mediation' in M Henssler and L Koch (eds), Mediation in der Anwaltspraxis (Deutscher Anwaltverlag 2004)

H Eidenmüller, 'Obstruktionsverbot, Vorrangregel und Absonderungsrechte' in F Richter, A Schüler and B Schwetzler (eds), Kapitalgeberansprüche, Marktwertorientierung und Unternehmenswert (Vahlen 2003)

H Eidenmüller, 'Commentary on § 217, § 218, § 221, § 222, § 225a and § 230 of the German Insolvency Code' in H-P Kirchhof, R Stürner, H Eidenmüller (ed), Münchener Kommentar zur Insolvenzordnung (C H Beck 2002)

H Eidenmüller, 'Obligatorisches versus optionales europäisches Vertragsgesetzbuch' in C Ott and H-B Schäfer (eds), Vereinheitlichung und Diversität des Zivilrechts in transnationalen Wirtschaftsräumenes Zivilrechts in transnationalen Wirtschaftsräumen (Mohr Siebeck 2002)

H Eidenmüller, 'Kapitalgesellschaftsrecht im Spiegel der ökonomischen Theorie: Shareholder Value, Insider Trading, Unternehmensübernahmen, Durchgriffshaftung, Unternehmenssanierung' in G Siebeck (ed), Artibus Ingenuis: Beiträge zu Theologie, Philosophie, Jurisprudenz und Ökonomik (Mohr Siebeck 2001)

H Eidenmüller, 'Ökonomik der Verjährungsregeln' in R Schulze, H Schulte-Nölke (ed), Die Schuldrechtsreform vor dem Hintergrund des Gemeinschaftsrechts (Mohr Siebeck 2001)

H Eidenmüller, 'Vertrags- und verfahrensrechtliche Grundfragen der Mediation: Möglichkeiten und Grenzen privatautonomen Konfliktmanagements' in S Breidenbach, D Coester-Waltjen, B Heß, A Nelle and Ch Wolf (eds), Konsensuale Streitbeilegung (Gieseking 2001)

H Eidenmüller, 'Vertrauensmechanismus und Vertrauenshaftung' in U Neumann and L Schulz (eds), Verantwortung in Recht und Moral (Steiner 2000)

H Eidenmüller, 'Insolvenzbewältigung durch Reorganisation' in C Ott and H-B Schäfer (eds), Effiziente Verhaltenssteuerung und Kooperation im Zivilrecht (Mohr Siebeck 1997)

H Eidenmüller, 'Ökonomische und spieltheoretische Grundlagen von Verhandlung/Mediation' in S Breidenbach and M Henssler (eds), Mediation für Juristen (Otto Schmidt 1997)

H Eidenmüller, 'Vertragliche Vorkehrungen gegen Insolvenzrisiken' in D Hart (ed), Privatrecht im ‘Risikostaat (Nomos 1997)

H Eidenmüller and A Heldrich, 'European Constitutionalism' in M-T Tinnefeld, L Philipps and S Heil (eds), Informationsgesellschaft und Rechtskultur in Europa (Nomos 1995)

H Eidenmüller, 'Ökonomische Effizienzkonzepte in der Rechtsanwendung' in S Breidenbach, S Grundmann, P Mülbert and R Singer (eds), Jahrbuch Junger Zivilrechtswissenschaftler 1992 (Rechtsfortbildung jenseits klassischer Methodik - Privatautono¬mie zwischen Status und Kontrakt - Privatrecht und Europa 1992) (Boorberg 1993)

Book (11)

H Eidenmüller and M Fries, Fälle zum Erbrecht (6th edn C H Beck 2017)

H Eidenmüller, Effizienz als Rechtsprinzip: Möglichkeiten und Grenzen der ökonomischen Analyse des Rechts (4th edn Mohr Siebeck 2015)

H Eidenmüller, C Duve and A Hacke, Mediation in der Wirtschaft: Wege zum effektiven Konfliktmanagement (2nd edn Otto Schmidt 2011)

H Eidenmüller, F Faust, H C Grigoleit and N Jansen, Revision des Verbraucher-acquis (Mohr Siebeck 2011)

H Eidenmüller, Finanzkrise, Wirtschaftskrise, und das deutsche Insolvenzrecht (de Gruyter 2009)

H Eidenmüller, C Bühring-Uhle and A Nelle, Verhandlungsmanagement (C H Beck 2009)

H Eidenmüller, Vertrags- und Verfahrensrecht der Wirtschaftsmediation: Mediationsvereinbarungen, Mediatorverträge, Mediationsvergleiche, Internationale Mediationsfälle (Otto Schmidt 2000)

H Eidenmüller, Unternehmenssanierung zwischen Markt und Gesetz: Mechanismen der Unternehmensreorganisation und Kooperationspflichten im Reorganisationsrecht (Otto Schmidt 1999)

H Eidenmüller, Effizienz als Rechtsprinzip: Möglichkeiten und Grenzen der ökonomischen Analyse des Rechts (2nd edn Mohr Siebeck 1998)

H Eidenmüller, Effizienz als Rechtsprinzip: Möglichkeiten und Grenzen der ökonomischen Analyse des Rechts (1st edn Mohr Siebeck 1995)

H Eidenmüller and Andreas Heldrich, Europarechtliche Regulierung der telefonischen Markt- und Sozialforschung (Duncker & Humblot 1995)

Edited Book (11)

H Eidenmüller (ed), Negotiating Brexit (Hart 2017)

H Eidenmüller and G Wagner (eds), Mediationsrecht (Otto Schmidt 2015)

H-P Kirchhof, R. Stürner and H Eidenmüller (eds), Münchener Kommentar zur Insolvenzordnung (C. H. Beck 2013)

H Eidenmüller (ed), Regulatory Competition in Contract Law and Dispute Resolution (C H Beck and Hart 2013)

H Eidenmüller (ed), Alternative Streitbeilegung: Neue Entwicklungen und Strategien zur frühzeitigen Konfliktbewältigung (C H Beck 2011)

H Eidenmüller and E-M Kieninger (eds), The Future of Secured Credit in Europe (Special Volume 2 European Company and Financial Law Review (ECFR) 2008)

H-P Kirchhof, R Stürner and H Eidenmüller (eds), Münchener Kommentar zur Insolvenzordnung (2nd edn C H Beck 2007)

H Eidenmüller and W Schön (eds), Efficient Creditor Protection in European Company Law (7 European Business Organization Law Review (EBOR) 2006)

S Lorenz , J. Adolff , A Trunk, H Eidenmüller and C Wendehorst (eds), Festschrift für Andreas Heldrich zum 70. Geburtstag (C H Beck 2005)

H Eidenmüller (ed), Ausländische Kapitalgesellschaften im deutschen Recht (C H Beck 2004)

H-P Kirchhof, R Stürner and H Eidenmüller (eds), Münchener Kommentar zur Insolvenzordnung (1st edn C H Beck 2002)

Report (1)

H Eidenmüller and A Hacke, Im Brexit-Poker hat die EU die besseren Karten (Frankfurter Allgemeine Zeitung (FAZ) 2016)

Case Note (5)

H Eidenmüller, 'BGH of 13 March 2003 (Überseering)' (2003) Juristenzeitung (JZ) 526 [Case Note]

H Eidenmüller, 'ECJ Case C-208/00 (Überseering), Opinion of the Advocate General delivered on December 12, 2001' (2002) 23 Zeitschrift für Wirtschaftsrecht (ZIP) 82 [Case Note]

H Eidenmüller and C Terharn, 'BGH of 28 September 1999 ' (1999) 2253 Wertpapier-Mitteilungen (WM) 3 [Case Note]

H Eidenmüller, 'BayVGH of 4 February 1992' (1992) Juristische Arbeitsblätter (JA) 250 [Case Note]

H Eidenmüller, 'BayVGH of 5 March 1992' (1992) Juristische Arbeitsblätter (JA) 348 [Case Note]

Review (5)

H Eidenmüller, 'E Braun and W Uhlenbruck, 'Unternehmensinsolvenz: Grundlagen, Gestaltungsmöglichkeiten, Sanierung mit der Insolvenzordnung'' (1999) Neue Juristische Wochenschrift (NJW) 41 [Review]

H Eidenmüller, 'C Ott, H-B Schäfer (eds), 'Ökonomische Probleme des Zivilrechts'' (1994) Zeitschrift für Rechtssoziologie (ZfRSoz) 92 [Review]

H Eidenmüller, 'D P Kommers, 'The Constitutional Jurisprudence of the Federal Republic of Germany'' (1991) Cambridge Law Journal (CLJ) 168 [Review]

H Eidenmüller, 'P S Atiyah, 'Pragmatism and Theory in English Law' ' (1990) Rabels Zeitschrift (RabelsZ) 387 [Review]

H Eidenmüller, 'A Kaufmann, W Hassemer (eds), 'Einführung in Rechtsphilosophie und Rechtstheorie der Gegenwart (5th edn)'' (1989) Juristische Ausbildung (JURA) 616 [Review]