Timothy Endicott explains that the reasoning of the majority in Miller was based on the paramount constitutional importance of the EU Treaties. However, he concludes that no clear authority was provided for this principle and argues that the reasoning of Lord Reed was more convincing.
Life After Brexit
Yesterday, together with the Programme for the Foundations of Law and Constitutional Government, we ran a seminar on Life after Brexit. The discussion was chaired by Nick Barber, with Alison Young,...
The White Paper on the Great Repeal Bill: Good or Bad News for Human Rights?
In a series of posts, Alison Young examines the Government's recent White Paper on the Great Repeal Bill, looking specifically at its potential impact on the protect of human rights post Brexit...