Post by Brandy Cochrane, PhD Candidate, Monash University.
The concept of security must be expanded past the discussions of state border tactics or the gender-neutral individual introduced by human security. In this post, I discuss security needs identified by refugee and asylum-seeking mothers. Currently in the final stretch of my PhD, I’m working to refocus the conceptualisation of security away from crisis points and onto the routinized insecurity that mothers face in the everyday.
The conception of everyday security for refugee and asylum-seeking mothers isn’t meant to convey a routine and unchanging monotony. Instead, the focus is on the everyday in changing environments, which is regularly ignored. The women with whom I spoke for my research aren’t considered at the same levels of risk as men because the additional dangers they face fall into the area of what’s often categorised as the private or household realm. As feminists have critiqued within multiple disciplines, these structural and institutionalised issues are routinized and faced daily by women. The everyday, then, isn’t meant to connote normalness or evoke comfort, but instead intended to frame an understanding of the risks and issues faced on a daily basis in a changing environment where concerns are constantly shifting.
Ιn the following table, I characterize the emergent themes that refugee women spoke of during their narratives.
|Bodily Safety||Freedom from physical and sexual violence, including family violence|
|Basic Needs||Lack of access to food, proper shelter, and good healthcare|
|Death/Separation||Hardship of death/separation from children/partners|
|Gender Inequalities||Oppressions in the form of education disparity, family abuses, societal consequences for divorce, not staying within gender roles|
|Carework Increases||Stress of additional responsibilities of care for children/partners/family|
|Reduced access to education due to legal status|
|Lack of Benefits|
Strain of reduced monetary benefits linked to legal status
|Language Barriers||Struggles of residing in a country with non-native language that creates communication issues|
|Physical Remoteness||Isolation of being held/settled in remote communities|
|Right to Work||Burden of not being legally allowed to work|
|Health Issues||Mental and physical health issues|
The ‘everyday security’ issues that emerge for refugee and asylum-seeking mothers fall both into and out of the needs categories that are put forth under the human security framework. The main issues within the needs categories include personal, economic, political, and health needs. Mothers identified issues such as deaths of children and partners, near drownings, economic upset, and political oppression which fit these notions.
However, many of the issues raised by refugee mothers don’t fit into the categories defined by the narrow conception of human security. Human security was primarily designed to meet the needs of male citizens, without considering the needs of women and migrants (and more specifically migrant women). Consequently, their experiences remain inadequately addressed. By examining the convergence of issues and the needs that fall outside of these definitions, we can explore the marginalised voices of security to identify the so-called outliers that may be commonplace in women’s daily lives.
Such issues include structural gender inequalities, education access, death and separation, and mobility. Women also emphasized continuing issues throughout their journeys that were routinized parts of everyday life, such as lack of contact with their families, additional carework in the absence of partners, physical remoteness, language barriers, and stable income. Hence we are drawn to the discussion of ‘whose security?’ by examining these issues that fall outside of the basic needs paradigms. By reframing the discussion to the everyday, we remove the emphasis from crisis points and the immediate survival focus that’s the basis of human security. An everyday security frame also removes the temporal focus and instead acknowledges that human lives are not just fixed points but instead fluid and ongoing projects.
To take this one step further, everyday security can help us understand the daily devastations that need to be navigated by refugee and asylum-seeking mothers in order to identify what a secure life would look like for them. Beyond the ‘basic crisis and immediate needs’ frame is a call for human flourishing and not just survival. Here we can see space for discussion around education and other aids to human development that simply cannot be addressed by a crisis-only focus.
How to cite this blog post (Harvard style):
Cochrane, B. (2016) Research Update: Brandy Cochrane. Available at: https://www.law.ox.ac.uk/research-subject-groups/centre-criminology/centreborder-criminologies/blog/2016/07/research-update-3 (Accessed [date]).