Richard Salter QC is a practising barrister, whose chambers are at 3 Verulam Buildings in Gray's Inn. Richard was called to the Bar in 1975, and was elected as a Bencher of the Inner Temple in 1991. He took silk in 1995, and was appointed a Recorder of the Crown Court in 2000. He was Chairman of the Inner Temple Scholarships Committee from 2002 to 2009, Chairman of the London Common Law & Commercial Bar Association from 2004-5, a member of the Bar Council from 2004 to 2013, and Chairman of the Bar Council Legal Services Committee from 2010 to 2013.
Richard is a commercial lawyer, specialising in banking and financial law. He has appeared in many of the leading English cases in this area, including the Bank Charges litigation (which ended in the House of Lords), Belmont v BNY Corporate Trustee Services and Goldman Sachs International v Novo Banco SA (both of which ended in the Supreme Court) and Central Bank of Ecuador v Conticorp (which ended in the Privy Council). He has also appeared before courts and arbitral tribunals in many other common-law jurisdictions. He was Chambers & Partners Banking and Finance Silk of the Year in 2012.
Richard also sits as a Deputy High Court Judge in the Queen's Bench Division and in the Commercial Court, and as an arbitrator under ICC and LCIA rules.
Richard has been the consulting editor for the All England Commercial Cases since the series began. He is a trustee of English Touring Opera, a trustee and chairman of the Comité d'Honneur of Les Azuriales Opera, and honorary counsel to the Worshipful Company of Musicians. From 2011-2017 he was a trustee of the Oxford Law Foundation.
- ISBN: 978-0-19-872525-1Considers the implications for issuers and other market participants of the Court of Appeal's recent decision in Taberna Europe CDO II Plc v Selskabet AF 1.September 2008 in Bankruptcy (formerly known as Roskilde Bank A/S)  EWCA Civ 1262 and reflects on how English financial law so often gives primacy to the “small print” over the practical reality.Considers the lengths to which it was necessary to go in the case of Re Public Joint Stock Company Commercial Bank (Privatbank)  EWHC 3299 (Ch) in order to confer rights on the ultimate investors in two series of intermediated securities: and reflects on how investors in such securities do not really “own” the securities which they buy.