Pushbacks at Europe’s land and sea borders have been well documented in the last decade. In recent years, exceptional political circumstances, such as the facilitation of the cross-border movement of migrants and refugees by one group of states into the territory of another have been put forward as a reason for these pushbacks. The violations of the absolute prohibition of refoulement, enshrined both in international refugee law and international human rights law (as well as fundamental rights protections under many constitutions) brought about by pushbacks in Europe’s borders have also given rise to important litigation and accountability efforts before domestic and international courts and UN human rights treaty bodies and UN special procedures.
This webinar, jointly organised with the Chair for Public Law and Human Rights at the University of Münster, will launch the Bonavero Report, ‘The Absolute Prohibition of Refoulement and Exceptional Circumstances’, which reproduces the Third Party Intervention (TPI) submitted to the European Court of Human Rights in the case of C.O.C.G. and Others v Lithuania, currently pending before its Grand Chamber. The TPI was jointly drafted by twenty-two academics, led by Professor Nora Markard at the Chair for Public Law and Human Rights at the University of Münster.
The speakers will examine the rules that are relevant to the interpretation and the application of the prohibition of non-refoulement under European Convention on Human Rights under exceptional political circumstances. Four set of relevant legal regimes will be examined: (a) the derogation regime and the absolute nature of non-refoulement under the European Convention on Human Rights; (b) non-refoulement exceptions under the 1951 Convention relating to the Status of Refugees; (c) circumstances precluding wrongfulness under international law of state responsibility; and (d) the European Union derogation regime and its relationship with the ECHR and public international law.